Knee derangements: comparison of isotropic 3D fast spin-echo, isotropic 3D balanced fast field-echo, and conventional 2D fast spin-echo MR imaging.

PURPOSE To compare diagnostic performance, subjective image quality, and artifacts of isotropic three-dimensional (3D) intermediate-weighted (IW) fast spin-echo (SE), isotropic 3D balanced fast field-echo (FFE), and conventional two-dimensional (2D) fast SE 3.0-T MR sequences in evaluation of cartilage, ligaments, menisci, and osseous knee structures in symptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. One hundred MR studies, each with three data sets (3D IW fast SE, 3D balanced FFE, 2D fast SE), were reviewed retrospectively. Two radiologists independently evaluated images for cartilaginous defects, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial meniscus (MM), lateral meniscus (LM) tears, subchondral bone marrow signal abnormalities, subjective image quality, and image artifacts. Arthroscopic results were the reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate interobserver agreement and compare diagnostic performance of sequences. RESULTS Sensitivity and specificity were greater than 85% for all lesions. For cartilaginous defects, sensitivity of 3D IW fast SE was significantly greater than that of 3D balanced FFE (95.5% vs 89.7%). Sensitivity of 3D IW fast SE and 2D fast SE for MM, LM, and ACL tears tended to be greater than that of 3D balanced FFE. IW fast SE had a higher detection rate for subchondral bone marrow signal abnormality than did 3D balanced FFE (34% vs 21%); it also had the best image quality and fewest artifacts, followed by 2D fast SE and 3D balanced FFE. Interobserver agreement was excellent for evaluation of all intraarticular structures (κ = 0.85-1) and good to excellent for detection of subchondral bone marrow signal abnormality (κ = 0.76-0.91). CONCLUSION The performance of IW fast SE is superior to that of balanced FFE in evaluation of cartilaginous defects, with no significant difference in performance between 2D fast SE, 3D IW fast SE, and 3D balanced FFE in evaluation of meniscal and ligament tears. Subchondral bone marrow signal abnormality is more easily seen on 3D IW fast SE images, with better subjective image quality and fewer artifacts, than on images obtained with other techniques.

[1]  F. Noyes,et al.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  C. Kang,et al.  Evaluation of the Chondromalacia Patella Using a Microscopy Coil: Comparison of the Two-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo Techniques and the Three-Dimensional Fast Field Echo Techniques , 2011, Korean journal of radiology.

[3]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of multiple signs with MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  Philip J Beatty,et al.  Isotropic MRI of the knee with 3D fast spin-echo extended echo-train acquisition (XETA): initial experience. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Richard Kijowski,et al.  Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging--diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. , 2009, Radiology.

[6]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Comparison of new sequences for high‐resolution cartilage imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Articular cartilage defects detected with 3D water-excitation true FISP: prospective comparison with sequences commonly used for knee imaging. , 2007, Radiology.

[8]  R. Fritz.  MR imaging of meniscal and cruciate ligament injuries. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[9]  D W Piraino,et al.  Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. , 1996, Radiology.

[10]  J. S. Keene,et al.  MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: importance of high signal in the meniscus that extends to the surface. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Richard Kijowski,et al.  Evaluation of the menisci of the knee joint using three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin-echo imaging: diagnostic performance in 250 patients with surgical correlation , 2012, Skeletal Radiology.

[12]  J H Mink,et al.  Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation. , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  M J Podgor,et al.  Acceptable values of kappa for comparison of two groups. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  J. Crues,et al.  Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[15]  Wilhelm Horger,et al.  Diagnosis of articular cartilage abnormalities of the knee: prospective clinical evaluation of a 3D water-excitation true FISP sequence. , 2007, Radiology.

[16]  Richard Kijowski,et al.  Vastly undersampled isotropic projection steady-state free precession imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance compared with conventional MR. , 2009, Radiology.

[17]  Richard Kijowski,et al.  Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady‐state free precession imaging , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  M. Barnett.  MR diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee: effect of field strength on efficacy. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  S. Wang,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo imaging: a modified FS 3D SPGR technique for assessment of patellofemoral joint chondromalacia. , 1999, Clinical imaging.

[20]  F Eckstein,et al.  Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  Dominik Weishaupt,et al.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives , 2006, European Radiology.

[22]  D G Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  M G Myriam Hunink,et al.  MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review. , 2003, Radiology.

[24]  S. Reeder,et al.  Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  T. Mosher,et al.  Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[26]  Jin Hwan Ahn,et al.  Diagnosis of internal derangement of the knee at 3.0-T MR imaging: 3D isotropic intermediate-weighted versus 2D sequences. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  Young Cheol Yoon,et al.  3D isotropic turbo spin-echo intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control in knee imaging: comparison study with 3D isotropic fast-field echo sequence , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[28]  Peter P Koch,et al.  Internal knee derangement assessed with 3-minute three-dimensional isovoxel true FISP MR sequence: preliminary study. , 2008, Radiology.

[29]  K. Friedrich,et al.  High-resolution cartilage imaging of the knee at 3T: basic evaluation of modern isotropic 3D MR-sequences. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[30]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. , 2005, Radiology.