Virtual species distribution models

Species distribution models (SDMs) have become a dominant paradigm for quantifying species-environment relationships, and both the models and their outcomes have seen widespread use in conservation studies, particularly in the context of climate change research. With the growing interest in SDMs, extensive comparative studies have been undertaken. However, few generalizations and recommendations have resulted from these empirical studies, largely due to the confounding effects of differences in and interactions among the statistical methods, species traits, data characteristics, and accuracy metrics considered. This progress report addresses ‘virtual species distribution models’: the use of spatially explicit simulated data to represent a ‘true’ species distribution in order to evaluate aspects of model conceptualization and implementation. Simulating a ‘true’ species distribution, or a virtual species distribution, and systematically testing how these aspects affect SDMs, can provide an important baseline and generate new insights into how these issues affect model outcomes.

[1]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models , 2007 .

[2]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[3]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[4]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[5]  T. Dawson,et al.  Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions , 2005 .

[6]  J. Lobo,et al.  Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence , 2007 .

[7]  J. M. A. Swan,et al.  An Examination of Some Ordination Problems By Use of Simulated Vegetational Data , 1970 .

[8]  J. Franklin,et al.  Effect of species rarity on the accuracy of species distribution models for reptiles and amphibians in southern California , 2009 .

[9]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference , 2009 .

[10]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife , 1996 .

[11]  J. Lobo,et al.  The effect of prevalence and its interaction with sample size on the reliability of species distribution models , 2009 .

[12]  C. Albert,et al.  Favourability functions versus probability of presence: advantages and misuses , 2008 .

[13]  J. Franklin.  Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients , 1995 .

[14]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? , 2012 .

[15]  B A Wintle,et al.  Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  C. Dormann.  Assessing the validity of autologistic regression , 2007 .

[17]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[18]  C. Meynard,et al.  Using virtual species to study species distributions and model performance , 2013 .

[19]  M. D’Amen,et al.  Scaling down distribution maps from atlas data: a test of different approaches with virtual species , 2012 .

[20]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers , 2010 .

[21]  Jennifer A. Miller.  Species Distribution Modeling , 2010 .

[22]  D. Rogers,et al.  The effects of species’ range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact? , 2004 .

[23]  Truly Santika.  Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data , 2011 .

[24]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology , 1989, Vegetatio.

[25]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species , 2001 .

[26]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  A new method for dealing with residual spatial autocorrelation in species distribution models , 2012 .

[27]  Richard Field,et al.  Spatial patterns of woody plant and bird diversity: functional relationships or environmental effects? , 2008 .

[28]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[29]  C. Meynard,et al.  The effect of a gradual response to the environment on species distribution modeling performance , 2012 .

[30]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[31]  Hulin Wu,et al.  Modelling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model , 1997, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[32]  J. Elith,et al.  Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models , 2009 .

[33]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions , 2011 .

[34]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models , 2007 .

[35]  C. Meynard,et al.  Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species , 2007 .

[36]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Equilibrium or not? Modelling potential distribution of invasive species in different stages of invasion , 2012 .

[37]  A. Jiménez‐Valverde.  Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling , 2012 .

[38]  V. Barve,et al.  Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors , 2012 .

[39]  C. Graham,et al.  New trends in species distribution modelling , 2010 .

[40]  A. Márcia Barbosa,et al.  Obtaining Environmental Favourability Functions from Logistic Regression , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[41]  S. Manel,et al.  Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence , 2001 .

[42]  Q. Guo,et al.  How to assess the prediction accuracy of species presence–absence models without absence data? , 2013 .

[43]  Jennifer A. Hoeting,et al.  An Improved Model for Spatially Correlated Binary Responses , 2000 .

[44]  M. Fortin,et al.  Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data , 2012 .

[45]  L. Belbin,et al.  Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: Role of artificial data and theory , 2006 .

[46]  Colin M Beale,et al.  Regression analysis of spatial data. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[47]  Lucille F. Stickel,et al.  A Comparison of Certain Methods of Measuring Ranges of Small Mammals , 1954 .

[48]  A. Peterson,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF MODELS OF FUNDAMENTAL ECOLOGICAL NICHES AND SPECIES' DISTRIBUTIONAL AREAS , 2005 .

[49]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction , 2010 .

[50]  Jennifer A. Miller.  Species distribution models , 2012 .

[51]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions (MPB-49) , 2011 .