Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)

Abstract Background The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. Methods Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. Results Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. Conclusions The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

[1]  S. Vincent Rajkumar,et al.  Utility of repeating bone marrow biopsy for confirmation of complete response in multiple myeloma , 2020, Blood Cancer Journal.

[2]  I. Hanamura,et al.  Randomised phase II study to optimise melphalan, prednisolone, and bortezomib in untreated multiple myeloma (JCOG1105) , 2020, British journal of haematology.

[3]  Andre H Crepaldi,et al.  Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[5]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  A. Órfão,et al.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. , 2015, Blood.

[7]  M. McHugh Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[8]  D. Esseltine,et al.  Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. , 2010, Blood.

[9]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Barlogie,et al.  International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma , 2006, Leukemia.

[11]  S. Jagannath,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH‐DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION , 1998, British journal of haematology.