Pay dispersion and workforce performance: moderating effects of incentives and interdependence

The compensation literature is replete with arguments, but lacking in empirical tests, regarding the effects of pay dispersion on organizational outcomes. Pay dispersion may increase effort and provide incentives for high workforce performance levels, but may also inhibit cooperation and goal orientation among employees. Drawing on several theoretical perspectives (individual motivation, institutional theory, organizational justice, and neoclassical economics), this study predicts that pay dispersion will be associated with higher levels of workforce performance when accompanied by formal individual incentive systems and independent work, while pay compression is desirable in the absence of individual incentive systems and when work is interdependent. Survey research studies in two industrial sectors (the motor carrier and concrete pipe industries) were conducted to address these issues. Interactive regression results were generally supportive of the predictions across several measures of workforce performance (accident rates, safety violations, and productivity). Implications of these studies for strategy implementation in terms of compensation theory and practice are addressed. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  The strategic management of people in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and extension , 2001 .

[2]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  Interdependence and Preference for Group Work: Main and Congruence Effects on the Satisfaction and Performance of Group Members , 2000 .

[3]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms , 1999 .

[4]  M. Bloom,et al.  The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations , 1999 .

[5]  R. Folger,et al.  RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE , 1997 .

[6]  G. Jenkins,et al.  A drop in the bucket: when is a pay raise a pay raise? , 1997 .

[7]  Edilberto F. Montemayor.  Congruence Between Pay Policy and Competitive Strategy in High-Performing Firms , 1996 .

[8]  P. Cohen.  Politics of pay. , 1996, Nursing Times.

[9]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[10]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[11]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[12]  G. Jenkins,et al.  The Politics of Pay , 1996 .

[13]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[14]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[15]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[16]  S. Snell,et al.  Strategic Compensation for Integrated Manufacturing: The Moderating Effects of Jobs and Organizational Inertia , 1994 .

[17]  James N. Baron,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations and Inequality , 1994 .

[18]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[19]  Mark Montgomery,et al.  Compensation Structure and Establishment Quit and Fire Rates , 1994 .

[20]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment , 1994 .

[21]  P. Osterman.  How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[22]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. , 1993 .

[23]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Interorganizational and Collective Strategies in Small Firms: Environmental Effects and Performance , 1992 .

[24]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  The Incentive Effects of Tournament Compensation Systems , 1992 .

[25]  David I. Levine,et al.  Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. , 1992 .

[26]  T. C. Powell.  Organizational alignment as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[27]  S. Snell,et al.  Integrated Manufacturing and Job Design: Moderating Effects of Organizational Inertia , 1991 .

[28]  David I. Levine,et al.  Cohesiveness, Productivity, and Wage Dispersion , 1991 .

[29]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  WHEN POLITICS PAYS: FACTORS INFLUENCING MANAGERIAL COMPENSATION DECISIONS , 1990 .

[30]  Ellen Ernst Kossek,et al.  The Human Side of Factory Automation , 1990 .

[31]  E. Lazear.  Pay Equality and Industrial Politics , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  John N. Pinto,et al.  Employees' perception of pay increases , 1989 .

[33]  Michael L. Bognanno,et al.  Do Tournaments Have Incentive Effects? , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  P. Benson,et al.  The Politics of Pay , 1988 .

[35]  John H. Bishop,et al.  The Recognition and Reward of Employee Performance , 1987, Journal of Labor Economics.

[36]  William Thomas Hogan,et al.  Minimills and Integrated Mills: A Comparison of Steelmaking in the United States , 1987 .

[37]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. , 1986 .

[38]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  A predictive study of organizational turnover rates , 1984 .

[39]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  The selection and consequences of job comparisons , 1982 .

[40]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[41]  John A. Weymark,et al.  A single-parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality , 1980 .

[42]  P. Allison.  Measures of Inequality , 1978 .

[43]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Motivation in Work Organizations , 1975 .

[45]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Pay and organizational effectiveness : a psychological view , 1972 .

[46]  G. Veigh.  Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View , 1972 .

[47]  M. Kleiner,et al.  From Piece Rates to Time Rates: Surviving Global Competition , 1998 .

[48]  J. Shaw,et al.  Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. , 1998 .

[49]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Strategic reward systems. , 1992 .

[50]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[51]  Robert H. Frank,et al.  Are Workers Paid their Marginal Products , 1984 .

[52]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  Agency, Earnings Profiles, Productivity, and Hours Restrictions , 1981 .

[53]  S. Freeman.  Wage Trends as Performance Displays Productive Potential: A Model and Application to Academic Early Retirement , 1977 .