Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus Shale gas development

Hydraulic fracturing has made vast quantities of natural gas from shale available, reshaping the energy landscape of the United States. Extracting shale gas, however, generates large, unavoidable volumes of wastewater, which to date lacks accurate quantification. For the Marcellus shale, by far the largest shale gas resource in the United States, we quantify gas and wastewater production using data from 2189 wells located throughout Pennsylvania. Contrary to current perceptions, Marcellus wells produce significantly less wastewater per unit gas recovered (approximately 35%) compared to conventional natural gas wells. Further, well operators classified only 32.3% of wastewater from Marcellus wells as flowback from hydraulic fracturing; most wastewater was classified as brine, generated over multiple years. Despite producing less wastewater per unit gas, developing the Marcellus shale has increased the total wastewater generated in the region by approximately 570% since 2004, overwhelming current wastewater disposal infrastructure capacity.

[1]  John A. Veil,et al.  Costs for off-site disposal of nonhazardous oil field wastes: Salt caverns versus other disposal methods , 1997 .

[2]  宮森 悠.  ライブラリー Annual Energy Outlook 2000 , 2000 .

[3]  D. Elcock,et al.  A white paper describing produced water from production of crude oil, natural gas, and coal bed methane. , 2004 .

[4]  Matthew E. Mantell.  Deep Shale Natural Gas: Abundant, Affordable, and Surprisingly Water Efficient , 2009 .

[5]  Roger R. Myers,et al.  Marcellus Shale Post-Frac Flowback Waters - Where is All the Salt Coming from and What are the Implications? , 2009 .

[6]  John A. Veil,et al.  Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States. , 2009 .

[7]  J. Arthur,et al.  Evaluating the Environmental Implications of Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2009 .

[8]  David J Campbell,et al.  Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: challenges and potential opportunities. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Jonathan D. Herman,et al.  A critical evaluation of unconventional gas recovery from the marcellus shale, northeastern United States , 2010 .

[10]  Matthew Eric Blauch.  Developing Effective and Environmentally Suitable Fracturing Fluids Using Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Waters , 2010 .

[11]  J. Veil.  Water management technologies used by Marcellus Shale Gas Producers. , 2010 .

[12]  T. Hothorn,et al.  A Robust Procedure for Comparing Multiple Means under Heteroscedasticity in Unbalanced Designs , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  Michael B. Smith,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing: History of an Enduring Technology , 2010 .

[14]  R. Jackson,et al.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. Dzombak,et al.  Water Management Challenges Associated with the Production of Shale Gas by Hydraulic Fracturing , 2011 .

[16]  A. Ingraffea,et al.  Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations , 2011 .

[17]  R. Jackson,et al.  Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Aie.  Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2012 , 2012 .

[19]  L. Kump,et al.  Geochemical evaluation of flowback brine from Marcellus gas wells in Pennsylvania, USA , 2013 .

[20]  Pooya Soltantabar.  Annual Energy Outlook , 2015 .