Small business innovation: firm level evidence from Sweden

This paper examines innovation among very small firms and provides new insights into both internal and external determinants of patenting. Applying a non-linear panel data approach to about 160,000 observations on manufacturing firms in Sweden for the period 2000–2006, the following facts emerge: (i) in contrast to larger firms, innovation in micro firms with 1–10 employees is not sensitive to variation in internal financial resources, (ii) skilled labour is even more important for innovation among micro firms compared to other firms, (iii) affiliation to a domestically owned multinational enterprise group increases the innovation capacity of small businesses, (iv) small firms’ innovation is closely linked to participation in international trade and exports to the G7-countries, and (v) there is no statistically significant evidence that proximity to metropolitan areas, or presence in a specialized cluster, increases the innovativeness of the smallest firm.

[1]  Olof Ejermo,et al.  Regional Innovation Measured by Patent Data—Does Quality Matter? , 2009 .

[2]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Firm Bebavior , 1993 .

[3]  Charles P. Himmelberg,et al.  R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries , 1994 .

[4]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Innovation Ideas and Regional Characteristics: Product Innovations and Export Entrepreneurship by Firms in Swedish Regions , 2008 .

[5]  F. Scherer.  New Perspectives on Economic Growth and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[6]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Harmonizing and Combining Large Datasets - an Application to Firm-Level Patent and Accounting Data , 2010 .

[7]  Michael Cross,et al.  New firm formation and regional development , 1981 .

[8]  Rui Baptista,et al.  Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters , 2000 .

[9]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity , 1986 .

[10]  Per Davidsson,et al.  New firm formation and regional development in Sweden , 1994 .

[11]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[12]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[13]  Wolfgang Keller,et al.  Technology Transfer Through Imports , 2007 .

[14]  Hans Lööf,et al.  The innovative performance of foreign-owned enterprises in small open economies , 2008 .

[15]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change , 1995 .

[16]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[17]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1987 .

[18]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[19]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Comparative Advantage of Educated Workers in Implementing New Technology , 1987 .

[20]  Giuseppe Scellato.  Patents, firm size and financial constraints: an empirical analysis for a panel of Italian manufacturing firms. , 2006 .

[21]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Dynamic Role of Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S , 2002 .

[22]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[23]  J. Bound,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF SKILL-BIASED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE* ELI BERMAN , 1998 .

[24]  The relationship between capital investment and R&D spending: a panel cointegration analysis , 2007 .

[25]  M. Andersson,et al.  Productivity and International Trade: Firm Level Evidence from a Small Open Economy , 2008 .

[26]  Stephen Machin,et al.  Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from Seven OECD Countries , 1998 .

[27]  J Wagner,et al.  Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm Level Data , 2005 .

[28]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Innovation and Institutional Ownership , 2013 .

[29]  B. Ohlin,et al.  Interregional and International Trade. , 1936 .

[30]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Growth: The David-Goliath Symbiosis , 2002, The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance.

[31]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[32]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The Acquisition of Technology and Small Firms by Large Firms , 1990 .

[33]  R. Rothwell.  Small firms, innovation and industrial change , 1989 .

[34]  Charles R. Hulten.  Total Factor Productivity: A Short Biography , 2000 .

[35]  Z. Ács,et al.  The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[36]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation” , 1991 .

[37]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Measuring eco-innovation , 2009 .

[38]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[39]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation and Size at the Firm Level , 1991 .

[40]  Bronwyn H. Hall,et al.  Financing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[41]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[42]  C. Marrewijk.  International Trade and the World Economy , 2002 .

[43]  A. Marshall.  Principles of Economics , .

[44]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[45]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[46]  Börje Johansson,et al.  INNOVATION ACTIVITIES EXPLAINED BY FIRM ATTRIBUTES AND LOCATION , 2008 .

[47]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[48]  G. Duranton,et al.  Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation and the Life-Cycle of Products , 2001 .

[49]  Why Foreign-owned Firms are Different: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2000 .

[50]  Diana Hicks,et al.  An Analysis of Small Business Patents by Industry and Firm Size , 2008 .

[51]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[52]  Arthur P. Becker,et al.  Psychological Production and Conservation , 1949 .

[53]  M. Feldman.  The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[54]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[55]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  Foreign-owned Firms: Are they Different? , 2002 .

[56]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[57]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[58]  Edgar M. Hoover,et al.  Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. , 1937 .

[59]  Vivian W. Fang,et al.  Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? , 2013 .

[60]  P. Romer,et al.  International Trade with Endogenous Technological Change , 1991 .

[61]  David Greenaway,et al.  Firm Heterogeneity, Exporting and Foreign Direct Investment , 2007 .

[62]  C. Hulten,et al.  New Developments in Productivity Analysis , 2001 .

[63]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom , 2009 .

[64]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Imports, Productivity and Origin Markets: The Role of Knowledge-Intensive Economies , 2010 .

[65]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[66]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Innovation and Firm Performance. Econometric Explorations of Survey Data , 2002 .

[67]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  the role of patents and licenses in securing external finance for innovation. , 2009 .