Relative status and interpersonal presumptuousness

Abstract Previous research has shown that, in status-discrepant dyads, the higher-status member's verbal behavior tends to be more presumptuous , that is, to have a higher proportion of utterances that imply a presumption of knowledge of the other, including Advisements, Interpretations, Confirmations, and Reflections as defined by a taxonomy of verbal response modes (VRMs). However, members of these dyads have differed in absolute status in an external social hierarchy as well as in relative status within the dyad. The present study was designed to distinguish relative status from absolute status. Eighteen senior psychology majors each participated in two similar conversations—one with a freshman and one with a professor. Conversations were coded using the VRM system. In freshman-senior dyads, seniors were more presumptuous and in senior-professor dyads, professors were more presumptuous, replicating previous findings. Seniors' presumptuousness was greater toward freshmen than toward professors, supporting the hypothesis that presumptuousness varies with relative status. Absolute status was not highly predictive of presumptuousness; there were no significant differences between seniors with freshmen and professors with seniors or between freshmen with seniors and seniors with professors.

[1]  William B. Stiles,et al.  Verbal Response Modes and Dimensions of Interpersonal Roles: A Method of Discourse Analysis. , 1978 .

[2]  W. Stiles,et al.  Dimensions of patient and physician roles in medical screening interviews. , 1979, Social science & medicine.

[3]  W. Wolfram,et al.  A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech , 1970 .

[4]  Status Perception Through Syntax , 1974, Language and speech.

[5]  William B. Stiles,et al.  Professorial presumptuousness in verbal interactions with university students , 1979 .

[6]  L. S. Harms.  Listener Comprehension of Speakers of Three Status Groups , 1961 .

[7]  W. Stiles,et al.  Parent-child interaction in the laboratory: Effects of role, task, and child behavior pathology on verbal response mode use , 1981, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[8]  L. S. Harms.  Listener judgments of status cues in speech , 1961 .

[9]  George N. Putnam,et al.  The status significance of an isolated urban dialect , 1956 .

[10]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[11]  B. Bass,et al.  Effects of the nature of the problem on LGD performance. , 1953 .

[12]  W. Labov.  The social stratification of English in New York City , 1969 .

[13]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[14]  L. S. Harms.  Status cues in speech: Extra-race and extra-region identification , 1963 .

[15]  Roderick P. Hart,et al.  The rhetoric of goodbye: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of human leave‐taking , 1973 .