The relation between graphing formulas by hand and students’ symbol sense

Students in secondary school often struggle with symbol sense, that is, the general ability to deal with symbols and to recognize the structure of algebraic formulas. Fostering symbol sense is an educational challenge. In graphing formulas by hand, defined as graphing using recognition and reasoning without technology, many aspects of symbol sense come to play. In a previous study, we showed how graphing formulas by hand could be learned. The aim of the study we present here is to explore the relationship between students’ graphing abilities and their symbol sense abilities while solving non-routine algebra tasks. A symbol sense test was administered to a group of 114 grade 12 students. The test consisted of eight graphing tasks and twelve non-routine algebra tasks, which could be solved by graphing and reasoning. Six students were asked to think aloud during the test. The findings show a strong positive correlation between the scores on the graphing tasks and the scores on the algebra tasks and the symbol sense used while solving these tasks. The thinking-aloud protocols suggest that the students who scored high on the graphing tasks used similar aspects of symbol sense in both the graphing and algebra tasks, that is, using combinations of recognizing function families and key features, and qualitative reasoning. As an implication for teaching practice, learning to graph formulas by hand might be an approach to promote students’ symbol sense.

[1]  A. Arcavi Symbol Sense: Informal Sense-Making in Formal Mathematics. , 1994 .

[2]  Abraham Arcavi,et al.  Practicing Algebraic Skills: A Conceptual Approach. , 2012 .

[3]  Christian R Hirsch,et al.  Symbol sense and its development in two computer algebra system environments , 1993 .

[4]  Kenneth Ruthven The influence of graphic calculator use on translation from graphic to symbolic forms , 1990 .

[5]  B. Schwarz,et al.  Prototypes: Brakes or Levers in Learning the Function Concept? The Role of Computer Tools , 1999 .

[6]  Raymond Duval,et al.  Representation, Vision and Visualization: Cognitive Functions in Mathematical Thinking. Basic Issues for Learning. , 1999 .

[7]  E. Paul Goldenberg,et al.  Mathematics, Metaphors, and Human Factors: Mathematical, Technical, and Pedagogical Challenges in the Educational Use of Graphical Representation of Functions , 1988 .

[8]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  The Co-Emergence of Machine Techniques, Paper-and-Pencil Techniques, and Theoretical Reflection: A Study of Cas use in Secondary School Algebra , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[9]  Marilyn P. Carlson,et al.  A Study of Students’ Readiness to Learn Calculus , 2015 .

[10]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Algebra Education: Exploring Topics and Themes , 2011 .

[11]  Anne Watson,et al.  Functions represented as linear sequential data: relationships between presentation and student responses , 2015 .

[12]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching , 1990 .

[13]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  The Role of Visual Representations in Advanced Mathematical Problem Solving: An Examination of Expert-Novice Similarities and Differences , 2004 .

[14]  Michal Yerushalmy Reaching the Unreachable: Technology and the Semantics of Asymptotes , 1997, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[15]  Mike Thomas,et al.  How Might Computer Algebra Systems Change the Role of Algebra in the School Curriculum , 2012 .

[16]  Luciana Bazzini,et al.  Consistencies and inconsistencies in students' solutions to algebraic ‘single-value’ inequalities , 2004 .

[17]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  The development of students’ algebraic proficiency , 2013, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education.

[18]  David Slavit,et al.  An Alternate Route to the Reification of Function , 1997 .

[19]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Qualitative Modeling in Education , 2004, AI Mag..

[20]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts' Performance on Representative Tasks , 2006 .

[21]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Identifying a framework for graphing formulas from expert strategies , 2015 .

[22]  Raymond Duval A Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in a Learning of Mathematics , 2006 .

[23]  J. V. van Driel,et al.  Promoting insight into algebraic formulas through graphing by hand , 2020 .

[24]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  Monitoring Progress in Algebra in a CAS Active Context: Symbol Sense, Algebraic Insight and Algebraic Expectation. , 2004 .

[25]  Marilyn P. Carlson,et al.  Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and a Study. , 2002 .

[26]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  综合学习的十个步骤* 教学与教学设计的新方式 [Ten Steps to Complex Learning - A New Approach to Instruction and Instructional Design] , 2012 .

[27]  Lynn Arthur Steen,et al.  On the shoulders of giants: new approaches to numeracy , 1990 .

[28]  E. Knuth Student Understanding of the Cartesian Connection: An Exploratory Study , 2000 .

[29]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  Developing algebraic insight , 2007 .