Starstruck by journal prestige and citation counts? On students’ bias and perceptions of trustworthiness according to clues in publication references

[1]  Rongting Zhou,et al.  Do cover papers get better citations and usage counts? An analysis of 42 journals in cell biology , 2022, Scientometrics.

[2]  S. Mammola,et al.  Measuring the influence of non-scientific features on citations , 2022, Scientometrics.

[3]  Beth A. Covitt,et al.  Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science , 2022, Science & Education.

[4]  Linhong Xu,et al.  Do negative citations reduce the impact of cited papers? , 2022, Scientometrics.

[5]  Tan Jin,et al.  Do research articles with more readable abstracts receive higher online attention? Evidence from Science , 2021, Scientometrics.

[6]  Frode Eika Sandnes,et al.  HIDE: Short IDs for Robust and Anonymous Linking of Users Across Multiple Sessions in Small HCI Experiments , 2021, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Frode Eika Sandnes,et al.  A bibliometric study of human–computer interaction research activity in the Nordic-Baltic Eight countries , 2021, Scientometrics.

[8]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Do researchers know what the h-index is? And how do they estimate its importance? , 2021, Scientometrics.

[9]  Evelyn Eika,et al.  Is Peer Feedback Helpful When Learning Literature Review Writing? A Study of Feedback Features and Quantity , 2021 .

[10]  D. Aksnes,et al.  Lone Geniuses or One among Many? An Explorative Study of Contemporary Highly Cited Researchers , 2021, J. Data Inf. Sci..

[11]  Xuanmin Ruan,et al.  The classification of citing motivations: a meta-synthesis , 2021, Scientometrics.

[12]  Eugenio Petrovich,et al.  Bibliometrics in Press. Representations and uses of bibliometric indicators in the Italian daily newspapers , 2020, Scientometrics.

[13]  Weishu Liu,et al.  A matter of time: publication dates in Web of Science Core Collection , 2020, Scientometrics.

[14]  C. Chinn,et al.  A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems , 2020 .

[15]  D. Allchin,et al.  Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media , 2020 .

[16]  David Waddington,et al.  Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education’s response to the post-truth era , 2020, Educational Psychologist.

[17]  F. Sandnes.  A simple back-of-the-envelope test for self-citations using Google Scholar author profiles , 2020, Scientometrics.

[18]  Serhii Nazarovets,et al.  Controversial practice of rewarding for publications in national journals , 2020, Scientometrics.

[19]  G. Sinatra,et al.  Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments , 2020 .

[20]  M. J. Cinelli,et al.  Are electronic white canes better than traditional canes? A comparative study with blind and blindfolded participants , 2020, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  Jun Wen,et al.  Effects of misleading media coverage on public health crisis: a case of the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in China , 2020 .

[22]  J. Zarocostas.  How to fight an infodemic , 2020, The Lancet.

[23]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information , 2019, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[24]  Enrico Motta,et al.  The Evolution of IJHCS and CHI: A Quantitative Analysis , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018 , 2019, Scientometrics.

[26]  J. Haba-Osca,et al.  Are journal and author self-citations a visibility strategy? , 2019, Scientometrics.

[27]  Yang Yang,et al.  The impact of video abstract on citation counts: evidence from a retrospective cohort study of New Journal of Physics , 2019, Scientometrics.

[28]  R. Kiley,et al.  cOAlition S: Response to PNAS , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Reza Zafarani,et al.  Fake News: A Survey of Research, Detection Methods, and Opportunities , 2018, ArXiv.

[30]  Danielle H. Lee.  Predictive power of conference-related factors on citation rates of conference papers , 2018, Scientometrics.

[31]  S. Norris,et al.  Students’ views of uncertainty in formal and personal science , 2018, Research in Science & Technological Education.

[32]  Jinseok Kim,et al.  Author‐based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Jie Tang,et al.  The impact of conference ranking systems in computer science: a comparative regression analysis , 2018, Scientometrics.

[34]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Why we need a new approach to teaching digital literacy , 2018 .

[35]  Yiming Zhao,et al.  Measuring the stability of scientific collaboration , 2018, Scientometrics.

[36]  Frode Eika Sandnes,et al.  Do Norwegian academics who publish more earn higher salaries? , 2018, Scientometrics.

[37]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning , 2018 .

[38]  Yiming Zhao,et al.  Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Omar Mubin,et al.  Tracking the follow-up of work in progress papers , 2017, Scientometrics.

[40]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Why attend to source information when reading online? The perspective of ninth grade students from two different countries , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Toward best practice framing of uncertainty in scientific publications: A review of Water Resources Research abstracts , 2017 .

[42]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Source evaluation of domain experts and novices during Web search , 2017, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[43]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Thinking fast and slow: Optimization decomposition across timescales , 2017, 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[44]  Stephen B. Broomell,et al.  Public Perception and Communication of Scientific Uncertainty , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Frode Eika Sandnes,et al.  The new Norwegian incentive system for publication: from bad to worse , 2016, Scientometrics.

[46]  Kirsten Berthold,et al.  The use of source-related strategies in evaluating multiple psychology texts: a student–scientist comparison , 2016 .

[47]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  How source information shapes lay interpretations of science conflicts: interplay between sourcing, conflict explanation, source evaluation, and claim evaluation , 2016 .

[48]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Undergraduate Students’ Justifications for Source Selection in a Digital Academic Context , 2016 .

[49]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts: Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation , 2015 .

[50]  Jian Xu,et al.  Author Credit for Transdisciplinary Collaboration , 2015, PloS one.

[51]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  How Laypeople Understand the Tentativeness of Medical Research News in the Media , 2015 .

[52]  Fuyuki Yoshikane,et al.  Factors affecting citation rates of research articles , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  Suraya Hamid,et al.  Web credibility assessment: affecting factors and assessment techniques , 2015, Inf. Res..

[54]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[55]  Naomi B. Robbins,et al.  Design of Diverging Stacked Bar Charts for Likert Scales and Other Applications , 2014 .

[56]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  Students’ consideration of source information during the reading of multiple texts and its effect on intertextual conflict resolution , 2014 .

[57]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents , 2014 .

[58]  G. Sinatra,et al.  Source Effects and Plausibility Judgments When Reading About Climate Change , 2014 .

[59]  D. Holste,et al.  A concept for inferring ‘frontier research’ in grant proposals , 2013, Scientometrics.

[60]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Searching the Web for conflicting topics: Page and user factors , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  Beth A. Covitt,et al.  Evaluating Scientific Arguments with Slow Thinking , 2013 .

[62]  Sue Allen,et al.  Outside the Pipeline: Reimagining Science Education for Nonscientists , 2013, Science.

[63]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Spontaneous Sourcing Among Students Reading Multiple Documents , 2013 .

[64]  Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al.  Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[65]  Philip Greenland,et al.  Ending Honorary Authorship , 2012, Science.

[66]  Thijs A. Velema.  The contingent nature of brain gain and brain circulation: their foreign context and the impact of return scientists on the scientific community in their country of origin , 2012, Scientometrics.

[67]  Jeffrey L. Foster,et al.  Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[68]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change , 2011 .

[69]  C. Cooper.  Media Literacy as a Key Strategy Toward Improving Public Acceptance of Climate Change Science , 2011 .

[70]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The role of conference publications in CS , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[71]  Yo-Ping Huang,et al.  Toward harmonious East–West educational partnerships: a study of cultural differences between Taiwanese and Norwegian engineering students , 2010 .

[72]  Jun Hu,et al.  The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field , 2010, Scientometrics.

[73]  Barney Pell,et al.  The research–teaching nexus: a case study of students' awareness, experiences and perceptions of research , 2010 .

[74]  A. Pickard,et al.  Users' trust in information resources in the Web environment: a status report , 2010 .

[75]  Frode Eika Sandnes,et al.  Studies or Leisure? A Cross-cultural Comparison of Taiwanese and Norwegian Engineering Students' Preferences for University Life* , 2010 .

[76]  Yo-Ping Huang,et al.  Cultural factors influencing Eastern and Western engineering students’ choice of university , 2010 .

[77]  Ivan K. Ash,et al.  Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks , 2009 .

[78]  Michael White,et al.  Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation , 2009, Scientometrics.

[79]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts , 2009 .

[80]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison , 2008, Scientometrics.

[81]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries , 2008, Scientometrics.

[82]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[83]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[84]  Fred Y. Ye,et al.  A quantitative relationship between per capita GDP and scientometric criteria , 2007, Scientometrics.

[85]  Yongyan Li,et al.  Apprentice Scholarly Writing in a Community Of Practice: An Intraview of an NNES Graduate Student Writing a Research Article , 2007 .

[86]  Rogério Mugnaini,et al.  International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases , 2006, Scientometrics.

[87]  Anders Isnes,et al.  Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues , 2006 .

[88]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Children's Understanding of Scientific Inquiry: Their Conceptualization of Uncertainty in Investigations of Their Own Design , 2004 .

[89]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .

[90]  Richard J. Paxton.  The Influence of Author Visibility on High School Students Solving a Historical Problem , 2002 .

[91]  Stein Dankert Kolstø,et al.  'To trust or not to trust,…'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue , 2001 .

[92]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Comparing the Epistemological Underpinnings of Students' and Scientists' Reasoning about Conclusions. , 2001 .

[93]  S. D. Kolstø.  Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues , 2001 .

[94]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know , 2001, Public Understanding of Science.

[95]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Universal access in the information society , 1999, HCI.

[96]  T. J. Phelan,et al.  A compendium of issues for citation analysis , 1999, Scientometrics.

[97]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Preparing Students for Competent Scientific Practice: Implications of Recent Research in Science and Technology Studies , 1999 .

[98]  Peter W. Hart,et al.  Relationship between growth in gross domestic product (GDP) and growth in the chemical engineering literature in five different countries , 1998, Scientometrics.

[99]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Assessing literacy in science: evaluation of scientific news briefs , 1997 .

[100]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[101]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[102]  D. Lindsey,et al.  Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science measuring what's measurable rather than what's valid , 1989, Scientometrics.

[103]  James S. Damico,et al.  Media Literacy and Climate Change in a Post-Truth Society , 2018 .

[104]  Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al.  Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[105]  J. E. Rabinovich,et al.  Publications of scientists of developing countries in international journals: Are they channels to the international circuit for colleagues that only publish in national journals? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[106]  Charles N. Herrick.  Junk Science and Environmental Policy: Obscuring Public Debate with Misleading Discourse , 2001 .