New particle formation in the Svalbard region 2006–2015

Abstract. Events of new particle formation (NPF) were analyzed in a 10-year data set of hourly particle size distributions recorded on Mt. Zeppelin, Spitsbergen, Svalbard. Three different types of NPF events were identified through objective search algorithms. The first and simplest algorithm utilizes short-term increases in particle concentrations below 25 nm (PCT (percentiles) events). The second one builds on the growth of the sub-50 nm diameter median (DGR (diameter growth) events) and is most closely related to the classical banana type of event. The third and most complex, multiple-size approach to identifying NPF events builds on a hypothesis suggesting the concurrent production of polymer gel particles at several sizes below ca. 60 nm (MEV (multi-size growth) events). As a first and general conclusion, we can state that NPF events are a summer phenomenon and not related to Arctic haze, which is a late winter to early spring feature. The occurrence of NPF events appears to be somewhat sensitive to the available data on precipitation. The seasonal distribution of solar flux suggests some photochemical control that may affect marine biological processes generating particle precursors and/or atmospheric photochemical processes that generate condensable vapors from precursor gases. Notably, the seasonal distribution of the biogenic methanesulfonate (MSA) follows that of the solar flux although it peaks before the maxima in NPF occurrence. A host of ancillary data and findings point to varying and rather complex marine biological source processes. The potential source regions for all types of new particle formation appear to be restricted to the marginal-ice and open-water areas between northeastern Greenland and eastern Svalbard. Depending on conditions, yet to be clarified new particle formation may become visible as short bursts of particles around 20 nm (PCT events), longer events involving condensation growth (DGR events), or extended events with elevated concentrations of particles at several sizes below 100 nm (MEV events). The seasonal distribution of NPF events peaks later than that of MSA and DGR, and in particular than that of MEV events, which reach into late summer and early fall with open, warm, and biologically active waters around Svalbard. Consequently, a simple model to describe the seasonal distribution of the total number of NPF events can be based on solar flux and sea surface temperature, representing environmental conditions for marine biological activity and condensation sink, controlling the balance between new particle nucleation and their condensational growth. Based on the sparse knowledge about the seasonal cycle of gel-forming marine microorganisms and their controlling factors, we hypothesize that the seasonal distribution of DGR and, more so, MEV events reflect the seasonal cycle of the gel-forming phytoplankton.

[1]  R. Martin,et al.  Contribution of Arctic seabird-colony ammonia to atmospheric particles and cloud-albedo radiative effect , 2016, Nature Communications.

[2]  H. Skov,et al.  Seasonal variation of atmospheric particle number concentrations, new particle formation and atmospheric oxidation capacity at the high Arctic site Villum Research Station, Station Nord , 2016 .

[3]  U. Dayan,et al.  Relationships linking primary production, sea ice melting, and biogenic aerosol in the Arctic , 2016 .

[4]  J. Schneider,et al.  Growth of nucleation mode particles in the summertime Arctic: a case study , 2016 .

[5]  M. Babin,et al.  A remote sensing algorithm for planktonic dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and an analysis of global patterns , 2015 .

[6]  Liqi Chen,et al.  Linking Phytoplankton Activity in Polynyas and Sulfur Aerosols over Zhongshan Station, East Antarctica , 2015 .

[7]  R. Martin,et al.  Processes controlling the annual cycle of Arctic aerosol number and size distributions , 2015 .

[8]  D. Brus,et al.  Aerosol size distribution seasonal characteristics measured in Tiksi, Russian Arctic , 2015 .

[9]  J. Heintzenberg,et al.  Potential source regions and processes of aerosol in the summer Arctic , 2015 .

[10]  Kaicun Wang,et al.  A Comparison of MODIS-Derived Cloud Fraction with Surface Observations at Five SURFRAD Sites , 2015 .

[11]  M. Galí,et al.  A meta‐analysis of oceanic DMS and DMSP cycling processes: Disentangling the summer paradox , 2015 .

[12]  E. Barnes,et al.  New-particle formation, growth and climate-relevant particle production in Egbert, Canada: analysis from 1 year of size-distribution observations , 2014 .

[13]  G. Mann,et al.  The complex response of Arctic aerosol to sea-ice retreat , 2014 .

[14]  Axel Schweiger,et al.  Evaluation of Seven Different Atmospheric Reanalysis Products in the Arctic , 2014 .

[15]  C. Leck,et al.  Size-resolved atmospheric particulate polysaccharides in the high summer Arctic , 2013 .

[16]  J. Heintzenberg,et al.  Marine nanogels as a source of atmospheric nanoparticles in the high Arctic , 2013 .

[17]  G. Johnson,et al.  MIMOC: A global monthly isopycnal upper‐ocean climatology with mixed layers , 2013 .

[18]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Clouds Observed by MODIS Onboard the Terra and Aqua Satellites , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  P. Tunved,et al.  Arctic aerosol life cycle: linking aerosol size distributions observed between 2000 and 2010 with air mass transport and precipitation at Zeppelin station, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard , 2012 .

[20]  Marcel Babin,et al.  Increasing cloudiness in Arctic damps the increase in phytoplankton primary production due to sea ice receding , 2012 .

[21]  J. Heintzenberg The aerosol-cloud-climate conundrum , 2012 .

[22]  J. Dachs,et al.  Re-examination of global emerging patterns of ocean DMS concentration , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[23]  Miikka Dal Maso,et al.  Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[24]  B. Hwang,et al.  New particle growth and shrinkage observed in subtropical environments , 2012 .

[25]  C. Leck,et al.  On the chemical dynamics of extracellular polysaccharides in the high Arctic surface microlayer , 2012 .

[26]  M. Ishizawa,et al.  Influence of transport and ocean ice extent on biogenic aerosol sulfur in the Arctic atmosphere , 2012 .

[27]  Wenche Aas,et al.  Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009 , 2012 .

[28]  L. Pirjola,et al.  A study of new particle formation in the marine boundary layer over the central Arctic Ocean using a flexible multicomponent aerosol dynamic model , 2012 .

[29]  M. Tjernström,et al.  Near-surface profiles of aerosol number concentration and temperature over the Arctic Ocean , 2011 .

[30]  C. Leck,et al.  Marine microgels as a source of cloud condensation nuclei in the high Arctic , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[32]  M. Orellana,et al.  DIMETHYLSULFONIOPROPIONATE STORAGE IN PHAEOCYSTIS (PRYMNESIOPHYCEAE) SECRETORY VESICLES 1 , 2011, Journal of phycology.

[33]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  On the occurrence of open ocean particle production and growth events , 2010 .

[34]  D. Ceburnis,et al.  Growth rates during coastal and marine new particle formation in western Ireland , 2010 .

[35]  P. S. Praveen,et al.  Chemical composition of rainwater at Maldives Climate Observatory at Hanimaadhoo (MCOH) , 2010 .

[36]  E. Bigg,et al.  New Particle Formation of Marine Biological Origin , 2010 .

[37]  L. Morawska,et al.  The role of sulphates and organic vapours in growth of newly formed particles in a eucalypt forest , 2010 .

[38]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Characteristics of new particle formation events and cluster ions at K-puszta, Hungary , 2009 .

[39]  R. Treffeisen,et al.  On small particles in the Arctic summer boundary layer : observations at two different heights near Ny-Alesund, Svalbard , 2009 .

[40]  Karine Sellegri,et al.  Seasonal variation of aerosol size distributions in the free troposphere and residual layer at the puy de Dôme station, France , 2009 .

[41]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Observations on nocturnal growth of atmospheric clusters , 2008 .

[42]  L. Pirjola,et al.  Intercomparison of dimethylsulfide oxidation mechanisms for the marine boundary layer: Gaseous and particulate sulfur constituents , 2007 .

[43]  B. Wehner,et al.  ‘How to find bananas in the atmospheric aerosol’: new approach for analyzing atmospheric nucleation and growth events , 2007 .

[44]  M. Tjernström,et al.  Aerosol number–size distributions during clear and fog periods in the summer high Arctic: 1991, 1996 and 2001 , 2006 .

[45]  P. Winsor,et al.  The interaction between waters from the Arctic Ocean and the Nordic Seas north of Fram Strait and along the East Greenland Current : results from the Arctic Ocean-02 Oden expedition , 2005 .

[46]  Hanna Vehkamäki,et al.  Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations , 2004 .

[47]  Stéphane Maritorena,et al.  Optimization of a semianalytical ocean color model for global-scale applications. , 2002, Applied optics.

[48]  A. Maurizi,et al.  The local wind field at Ny-Å lesund and the Zeppelin mountain at Svalbard , 2001 .

[49]  R. Simó,et al.  Production of atmospheric sulfur by oceanic plankton: biogeochemical, ecological and evolutionary links. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  J. M. Mäkelä,et al.  On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles , 2001 .

[51]  E. Bigg,et al.  Aerosol production over remote marine areas‐A new route , 1999 .

[52]  L. Pirjola,et al.  FORMATION OF SULPHURIC ACID AEROSOLS AND CLOUD CONDENSATION NUCLEI: AN EXPRESSION FOR SIGNIFICANT NUCLEATION AND MODEL COMPRARISON , 1999 .

[53]  Dorothy K. Hall,et al.  The aerosol at Barrow, Alaska: long-term trends and source locations , 1999 .

[54]  L. Barrie,et al.  Sources of aerosol sulphate at Alert: Apportionment using stable isotopes , 1999 .

[55]  A. Stohl Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories—A review and bibliography , 1998 .

[56]  M. Vernet,et al.  Dynamics of the vernal bloom in the marginal ice zone of the Barents Sea: Dimethyl sulfide and dimethylsulfoniopropionate budgets , 1997 .

[57]  C. Leck,et al.  Dimethylsulfide oxidation and the ratio of methanesulfonate to non sea-salt sulfate in the marine aerosol , 1996 .

[58]  C. Leck,et al.  The central Arctic Ocean as a source of dimethyl sulfide , 1996 .

[59]  C. Leck,et al.  Seasonal and short-term variability in dimethyl sulfide, sulfur dioxide and biogenic sulfur and sea salt aerosol particles in the arctic marine boundary layer during summer and autumn , 1996 .

[60]  D. Covert,et al.  Occurrence of an ultrafine particle mode less than 20 nm in diameter in the marine boundary layer during Arctic summer and autumn , 1996 .

[61]  J. Heintzenberg,et al.  Seasonal variation of the atmospheric aerosol near the top of the marine boundary layer over Spitsbergen related to the Arctic sulphur cycle , 1994 .

[62]  S. Warren,et al.  Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate , 1987, Nature.

[63]  James N. Galloway,et al.  Sea‐salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation , 1986 .

[64]  J. Heintzenberg,et al.  SO 2 and SO 4 = in the arctic: interpretation of observations at three Norwegian arctic-subarctic stations , 1983 .

[65]  H. Hansson,et al.  A comprehensive study of physical and chemical parameters of the Arctic summer aerosol; results from the Swedish expedition Ymer-80 , 1983 .

[66]  N. Z. Heidam,et al.  Ground level measurements of the summer tropospheric aerosol in Northern Greenland , 1978 .

[67]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Aerosol classification by electric mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications , 1975 .

[68]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Accurate measurement of aerosol electric mobility moments , 1975 .

[69]  A. H. Woodcock,et al.  Bubble Formation and Modification in the Sea and its Meteorological Significance , 1957 .

[70]  Lena Vogler,et al.  Air Chemistry And Radioactivity , 2016 .

[71]  K. Stamnes,et al.  IOCCG Report Number 16, 2015 Ocean Colour Remote Sensing in Polar Seas . Chapter 2; The Polar Environment: Sun, Clouds, and Ice , 2015 .

[72]  under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Formation and characteristics of ions and charged aerosol particles , 2007 .

[73]  Christiane Lancelot,et al.  Phaeocystis blooms in the global ocean and their controlling mechanisms: a review , 2005 .

[74]  Miikka Dal Maso,et al.  Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland , 2005 .

[75]  G. Reischl Measurement of Ambient Aerosols by the Differential Mobility Analyzer Method: Concepts and Realization Criteria for the Size Range Between 2 and 500 nm , 1991 .

[76]  C. J. Hahn,et al.  The biogeochemical sulfur cycle in the marine boundary layer over the Northeast Pacific Ocean , 1990 .

[77]  L. Merlivat,et al.  Air-Sea Gas Exchange Rates: Introduction and Synthesis , 1986 .

[78]  Jugal K. Agarwal,et al.  Continuous flow, single-particle-counting condensation nucleus counter , 1980 .

[79]  M. Tjernström,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics on the Potential Contribution of Open Lead Particle Emissions to the Central Arctic Aerosol Concentration , 2022 .