Positive invariant sets for fault tolerant multisensor control schemes

This article deals with fault tolerant multisensor control schemes for systems with linear dynamics. Positive invariance is a common analysis and control design tool for systems affected by bounded constraints and disturbances. This article revisits the construction of ε-approximations of minimal robust positive invariant sets for linear systems upon contractive set-iterations. The cases of switching between different sets of disturbances and the inclusion of a predefined region of the state space are treated in detail. All these results are used in multisensor control schemes which have to deal with specific problems originated by the switching between different estimators and by the presence of faults in some of the sensors. The construction of positive invariant sets for different operating regimes provides, in this context, effective fault detection information. Within the same framework, global stability of the switching strategies can be assured if the invariant sets topology allows the exclusive selection of estimates obtained from healthy sensors.

[1]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Set-theoretic methods in control , 2007 .

[2]  C. Canudas-de-Wit,et al.  Model reference control approach for safe longitudinal control , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[3]  Shu-Li Sun,et al.  Multi-sensor optimal information fusion Kalman filter , 2004, Autom..

[4]  Zvi Artstein,et al.  Feedback and invariance under uncertainty via set-iterates , 2008, Autom..

[5]  A. P. Shveidel,et al.  Seperability of Star-Shaped Sets and its Application to an Optimization Problem , 1997 .

[6]  José A. De Doná,et al.  Multisensor switching control strategy with fault tolerance guarantees , 2008, Autom..

[7]  J. Lunze,et al.  Diagnosis of Linear Systems with Structured Uncertainties based on Guaranteed State Observation , 2008 .

[8]  Sasa V. Rakovic,et al.  Minkowski algebra and Banach Contraction Principle in set invariance for linear discrete time systems , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  María M. Seron,et al.  A systematic method to obtain ultimate bounds for perturbed systems , 2007, Int. J. Control.

[10]  A. Rubinov,et al.  The space of star-shaped sets and its applications in nonsmooth optimization , 1986 .

[11]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Controller and Sensor Switching Problems , 2012 .

[12]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Sensor fusion potential exploitation-innovative architectures and illustrative applications , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Invariant approximations of the minimal robust positively Invariant set , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  José A. De Doná,et al.  Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Sensor Recovery in a Multisensor Control Scheme , 2009 .

[15]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Robust time-optimal control of constrained linear Systems , 1997, Autom..

[16]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Stabilizability of switched linear systems does not imply the existence of convex Lyapunov functions , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control , 2006 .

[18]  Ren C. Luo,et al.  Multisensor fusion and integration: approaches, applications, and future research directions , 2002 .

[19]  E. Gilbert,et al.  Theory and computation of disturbance invariant sets for discrete-time linear systems , 1998 .

[20]  Y. Ohta,et al.  /spl epsiv/-feasible approximation of the state reachable set for discrete-time systems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).