Geochemical Exploration for Gold Through Transported Alluvial Cover in Nevada: Examples from the Cortez Mine

Geochemical orientation surveys were completed over covered Carlin-type gold deposits in the Cortez mine area with the expressed aim of identifying and evaluating exploration methods to discover Au ore under transported alluvial cover in Nevada. Orientation tests were designed to assess the utility of geochemical applications at various scales of exploration, both drill targets at the deposit scale and “footprints” associated with deposits at the district scale. Detailed surveys were completed over the covered Gap deposit, located adjacent to the giant Pipeline deposit. Both Carlin-type gold mineralization and earlier, spatially associated, base metal skarn mineralization at Gap were located by soils, soil gas, and vegetation. Loam soils at 6- to 12-cm depth provided a consistent and uniformly available sample medium. Gold ore under 10 m of cover in the northern portion of the Gap deposit was readily detected by analysis of Au by fire assay and ultra trace aqua regia methods in the −80 mesh fraction of these loam soils. Arsenic anomalies occur over the northern end and over the main ore zone at Gap, where there is 25 to 50 m of alluvial cover. Zinc concentrations in soil show the most coherent spatial relationship with underlying Au ore. Tests of MMI-B and Enzyme Leach selective leaches did not result in significant enhancement of the anomalies relative to aqua regia. CO2 and O2 in soil gas indicate faults and underlying mineralized carbonates at Gap, where weathering reactions likely generated CO2 from acid reaction with carbonate. Elevated Au and As in mixed sagebrush and shadscale occur over most ore zones, with the highest Au concentrations over the main ore zone rather than the shallowly buried northern zone. Like soils, elevated Zn in vegetation shows the most coherent spatial relationship with underlying ore. Assays from 1,859 drill holes show a 4- to 5-km2 “footprint” at the basin gravel-bedrock unconformity centered on the Pipeline Carlin-type gold deposit, where samples of basal alluvium provide a large, coherent >50 ppb Au anomaly. Enriched As, Tl, K, and F in alkaline groundwater sampled from monitoring wells surrounding the Pipeline open pit provide a ≥5-km2 hydrogeochemical footprint. Higher As and Tl concentrations occur down gradient from Pipeline indicating Carlin-type Au mineralization is the source of the enrichment. The surface metal anomalies are consistent with upward migration of metals through fractured alluvial cover. Likely metal transport mechanisms include barometric pumping of gases or seismic pumping of groundwater. Upward diffusion of metals through the thick vadose zones in northern Nevada is not a viable process. Surface anomalies over Gap and other deposits appear to be mature and may have developed over millions of years. In such mature anomalies, much of the metal that migrated from underlying bedrock is probably hosted in resistant secondary minerals, which are more readily dissolved by aqua regia than by various selective leaches. Sampling of soil gas and soils is appropriate at the drill target scale. Vegetation should be sampled when consistent soils are not available. Sample spacing should be adjusted according to “real-time” soil gas readings in order to increase sampling density over fracture zones. The patterns of >50 ppb Au for both the top of bedrock and base of alluvium at Pipeline provide useful templates for comparison with other drilling programs through cover. Groundwater is an effective and under-utilized reconnaissance-scale sample medium. Gold is likely to be soluble in neutral to alkaline groundwater in Nevada, and could provide a direct indicator of blind covered ore.

[1]  R. Sibson.  Fluid Flow Accompanying Faulting: Field Evidence and Models , 2013 .

[2]  M. Leybourne,et al.  Groundwater in geochemical exploration , 2010 .

[3]  S. Wakelin,et al.  A microbial pathway for the formation of gold-anomalous calcrete , 2009 .

[4]  D. A. John,et al.  Magmatic and tectonic evolution of the Caetano caldera, north-central Nevada: A tilted, mid-Tertiary eruptive center and source of the Caetano Tuff , 2008 .

[5]  R. Donelick,et al.  Thermal and isotopic profiling of the Pipeline hydrothermal system: Application to exploration for Carlin-type gold deposits , 2006 .

[6]  D. L. Kelley,et al.  Beyond the Obvious Limits of Ore Deposits: The Use of Mineralogical, Geochemical, and Biological Features for the Remote Detection of Mineralization , 2006 .

[7]  V. G. Mossotti,et al.  Regional Surficial Geochemistry of the Northern Great Basin , 2006 .

[8]  D. L. Kelley,et al.  Exploring For Deposits Under Deep Cover Using Geochemistry , 2005, SEG Discovery.

[9]  Albert H. Hofstra,et al.  Carlin-Type Gold Deposits in Nevada: Critical Geologic Characteristics and Viable Models , 2005 .

[10]  M. Leybourne,et al.  Finding deeply buried deposits using geochemistry , 2004, Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis.

[11]  Bettles Keith.  Exploration and Geology, 1962 to 2002, at the Goldstrike Property, Carlin Trend, Nevada , 2002 .

[12]  M. Lintern.  Exploration for gold using calcrete – lessons from the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia , 2001, Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis.

[13]  M. Gingrich,et al.  Geologic Overview of the Getchell Gold Mine Geology, Exploration, and Ore Deposits, Humboldt County, Nevada , 2000 .

[14]  J. Lovell.  Chapter 14 Oxygen and carbon dioxide in soil air , 2000 .

[15]  A. Kremenetsky,et al.  Orientation study of strategic deep penetration geochemical methods in the central Kyzylkum desert terrain, Uzbekistan , 1999 .

[16]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Electrochemical mass-transport in overburden: a new model to account for the formation of selective leach geochemical anomalies in glacial terrain , 1998 .

[17]  B. W. Smee.  A new theory to explain the formation of soil geochemical responses over deeply covered gold mineralization in arid environments , 1998 .

[18]  A. Mann,et al.  Application of the mobile metal ion technique to routine geochemical exploration , 1998 .

[19]  G. Hall,et al.  Detection of past underground nuclear events by geochemical signatures in soils , 1997 .

[20]  Clark.  Innovative Enzyme Leach Provides Cost-Effective Overburden / Bedrock Penetration , 1997 .

[21]  G. Hall,et al.  Pb isotopic ratios and elemental abundances for selective leachates from near-surface till: implications for mineral exploration , 1996 .

[22]  G. B. Hudson,et al.  Trace gas emissions on geological faults as indicators of underground nuclear testing , 1996, Nature.

[23]  J. Mchugh,et al.  Anomalous gold, antimony, arsenic, and tungsten in ground water and alluvium around disseminated gold deposits along the Getchell Trend, Humboldt County, Nevada , 1995 .

[24]  R. Klusman,et al.  Soil gas and related methods for natural resource exploration , 1993 .

[25]  S. C. Smith,et al.  Gold patterns in big sagebrush over the CX and Mag deposits, Pinson Mine, Humboldt County, Nevada , 1992 .

[26]  L. Malmqvist,et al.  Geogas prospecting: a new tool in the search for concealed mineralizations , 1990 .

[27]  C. Kuehn.  Discoveries of epithermal precious metal deposits , 1987 .

[28]  John H. Stewart,et al.  Geologic map of Nevada , 1978 .

[29]  Theodore J. Armbrustmacher,et al.  Geochemical and geologic relations of gold and other elements at the Gold Acres open-pit mine, Lander County, Nevada , 1975 .

[30]  J. E. Elliott,et al.  Geology and geochemistry of the Cortez gold deposit, Nevada , 1969 .

[31]  H. Masursky,et al.  Geology of the Cortez Quadrangle, Nevada , 1965 .

[32]  J. Gilluly,et al.  Tectonic and igneous geology of the northern Shoshone Range, Nevada, with sections on gravity in Crescent Valley and economic geology , 1965 .