Integrative Systems Praxis for Implementation Research (INSPIRE): An Implementation Methodology to Facilitate the Global Elimination of Cervical Cancer

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for a systems thinking approach to health systems strengthening to increase adoption of evidence-based interventions (EBI). The Integrative Systems Praxis for Implementation Research (INSPIRE) methodology operationalizes the WHO systems thinking framework to meet cervical cancer elimination–early detection and treatment (CC-EDT) goals. Methods: Using a systems thinking approach and grounded in the consolidated framework for implementation research, INSPIRE integrates multiple research methodologies and evaluation frameworks into a multilevel implementation strategy. Results: In phase I (creating a shared understanding), soft systems methodology and pathway analysis are used to create a shared visual understanding of the CC-EDT system, incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives of the “what, how, and why” of system behavior. Phase II (finding leverage) facilitates active stakeholder engagement in knowledge transfer and decision-making using deliberative dialogues and multiple scenario analyses. Phase III (acting strategically) represents stakeholder-engaged implementation planning, using well-defined implementation strategies of education, training, and infrastructure development. In phase IV (learning and adapting), evaluation of key performance indicators via a reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework is reviewed by stakeholder teams, who continuously adapt implementation plans to improve system effectiveness. Conclusions: The INSPIRE methodology is a generalizable approach to context-adapted implementation of EBIs. Impact: Replacing static dissemination of implementation “roadmaps” with learning health systems through the integration of systems thinking and participatory action research, INSPIRE facilitates the development of scalable and sustainable implementation strategies adapted to local contexts.

[1]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[2]  Gerhard Chroust,et al.  4.3.1 Towards a Common Language for Systems Praxis , 2013 .

[3]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students , 2007 .

[4]  Sharifa Ezat Alkaff,et al.  Primary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Resource-Stratified Guideline , 2017, Journal of global oncology.

[5]  Michael Seid,et al.  Coproduction of healthcare service , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[6]  A. Beddoe Elimination of cervical cancer: challenges for developing countries , 2019, Ecancermedicalscience.

[7]  J. Lowery,et al.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[8]  J. Jeronimo,et al.  Implementation of HPV testing in Latin America. , 2016, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[9]  Nancy Carter,et al.  Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[10]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[11]  Paul A Estabrooks,et al.  Practical Clinical Trials for Translating Research to Practice: Design and Measurement Recommendations , 2005, Medical care.

[12]  Sameh El-Saharty,et al.  Implementation research: new imperatives and opportunities in global health , 2018, The Lancet.

[13]  J. Lavis,et al.  How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? , 2003, The Milbank quarterly.

[14]  Alicia C. Bunger,et al.  Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda , 2010, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[15]  Enola K. Proctor,et al.  A Compilation of Strategies for Implementing Clinical Innovations in Health and Mental Health , 2012, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[16]  A. George,et al.  Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda , 2017, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[17]  S. de Sanjosé,et al.  What is needed now for successful scale-up of screening? , 2019, Papillomavirus research.

[18]  S. Guilcher,et al.  Toward a Person-Centred Learning Health System: Understanding Value from the Perspectives of Patients and Caregivers. , 2019, HealthcarePapers.

[19]  R. P. Bood,et al.  Scenario analysis as a strategic management tool , 1998 .

[20]  T. Adam,et al.  Systems thinking for strengthening health systems in LMICs: need for a paradigm shift. , 2012, Health policy and planning.

[21]  V. Tsu Cervical cancer elimination: are targets useful? , 2020, The Lancet.

[22]  David H Peters,et al.  The application of systems thinking in health: why use systems thinking? , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[23]  A. Nessa,et al.  Scaling up proven innovative cervical cancer screening strategies: Challenges and opportunities in implementation at the population level in low‐ and lower‐middle‐income countries , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[24]  G. T. Jun,et al.  Health care process modelling: which method when? , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[25]  B. Janowitz,et al.  A comparison of four approaches for measuring clinician time use. , 1999, Health policy and planning.

[26]  R. Hariprasad,et al.  Management algorithms for cervical cancer screening and precancer treatment for resource‐limited settings , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[27]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control , 2018, Cancer Causes & Control.