Androgen receptor inhibitor–induced “BRCAness” and PARP inhibition are synthetically lethal for castration-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen receptor inhibition induces a “BRCAness” state that may be exploited with PARP inhibitors in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Engineering BRCAness and chemotherapeutic sensitivity BRCA mutations impair a double-strand break DNA repair pathway that forces cells to use a PARP-dependent repair pathway. PARP inhibitors are selectively toxic to breast cancers with BRCA mutations, spurring the search for other tumors or ways in which to apply such exquisitely tumor-targeted therapy. Few other tumors have BRCA mutations as commonly as do breast tumors. However, Li et al. found that a common therapy for prostate cancer patients created a BRCA-deficient state that sensitized tumor cells to PARP inhibitors and leveraged this finding into a potential treatment strategy. Noting that the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide decreased the expression of BRCA1 in prostate cancer cells, the authors treated a mouse model of prostate cancer first with enzalutamide and then with the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Sequential treatment of enzalutamide and olaparib suppressed tumor growth in these mice better than either drug by itself or when both drugs were administered at the same time. The results suggest that “BRCAness” could be therapeutically induced to provide more treatment options not only for prostate cancer patients but also for patients with other types of cancers lacking BRCA mutations. Cancers with loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are deficient in the DNA damage repair pathway called homologous recombination (HR), rendering these cancers exquisitely vulnerable to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This functional state and therapeutic sensitivity is referred to as “BRCAness” and is most commonly associated with some breast cancer types. Pharmaceutical induction of BRCAness could expand the use of PARP inhibitors to other tumor types. For example, BRCA mutations are present in only ~20% of prostate cancer patients. We found that castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells showed increased expression of a set of HR-associated genes, including BRCA1, RAD54L, and RMI2. Although androgen-targeted therapy is typically not effective in CRPC patients, the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide suppressed the expression of those HR genes in CRPC cells, thus creating HR deficiency and BRCAness. A “lead-in” treatment strategy, in which enzalutamide was followed by the PARP inhibitor olaparib, promoted DNA damage–induced cell death and inhibited clonal proliferation of prostate cancer cells in culture and suppressed the growth of prostate cancer xenografts in mice. Thus, antiandrogen and PARP inhibitor combination therapy may be effective for CRPC patients and suggests that pharmaceutically inducing BRCAness may expand the clinical use of PARP inhibitors.

[1]  L. Ellisen PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy: promise, progress, and puzzles. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[2]  K. Khanna,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[3]  E. Yu,et al.  Targeted therapy in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2013, Oncology.

[4]  G. Lou,et al.  Correlation of TNFAIP8 overexpression with the proliferation, metastasis, and disease-free survival in endometrial cancer , 2014, Tumor Biology.

[5]  Likun Li,et al.  DNA damage response and prostate cancer: defects, regulation and therapeutic implications , 2014, Oncogene.

[6]  J. Efstathiou,et al.  DNA Damage Response Assessments in Human Tumor Samples Provide Functional Biomarkers of Radiosensitivity. , 2015, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[7]  S. Schenone,et al.  SGK1, the New Player in the Game of Resistance: Chemo-Radio Molecular Target and Strategy for Inhibition , 2016, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry.

[8]  E. Ratner,et al.  Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: on the horizon of tailored and personalized therapies for epithelial ovarian cancer , 2012, Current opinion in oncology.

[9]  F. Feng,et al.  A hormone-DNA repair circuit governs the response to genotoxic insult. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[10]  C. I. Bliss THE TOXICITY OF POISONS APPLIED JOINTLY1 , 1939 .

[11]  C. Scott,et al.  Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: recent advances and future development. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  L. Trümper From bench to bedside , 2005, Medizinische Klinik.

[13]  Wei Yan,et al.  Mechanistic rationale for inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in ETS gene fusion-positive prostate cancer. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[14]  R. Grossman,et al.  HER2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor–Modified Virus-Specific T Cells for Progressive Glioblastoma: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Trial , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[15]  Ralph R. Weichselbaum,et al.  DNA Repair Pathway Gene Expression Score Correlates with Repair Proficiency and Tumor Sensitivity to Chemotherapy , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[16]  D. Olmos,et al.  Targeting DNA Repair: The Role of PARP Inhibition in the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer , 2016, Cancer journal.

[17]  S. Tangutoori,et al.  PARP inhibitors: A new era of targeted therapy. , 2015, Maturitas.

[18]  E. Kohn,et al.  PARP Inhibitors for BRCA1/2 mutation-associated and BRCA-like malignancies. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  H. Hieronymus,et al.  Androgen receptor signaling regulates DNA repair in prostate cancers. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[20]  G. Chenevix-Trench,et al.  A fine-scale dissection of the DNA double-strand break repair machinery and its implications for breast cancer therapy , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Sara A. Grimm,et al.  The novel p53 target TNFAIP8 variant 2 is increased in cancer and offsets p53-dependent tumor suppression , 2016, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[22]  B. Wang,et al.  Trapping Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase , 2015, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[23]  N. Vogelzang Two paths forward in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2013, Oncology.

[24]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  The Mutational Landscape of Lethal Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer , 2016 .

[25]  R. Plummer,et al.  Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors: from bench to bedside. , 2014, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[26]  C. Sander,et al.  Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[27]  Piacentini Giorgio,et al.  Emerging therapeutic strategies. , 2013 .

[28]  Manash S. Chatterjee,et al.  The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib (MK4827) in BRCA mutation carriers and patients with sporadic cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  A. Ashworth,et al.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy , 2012, Nature.

[30]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[31]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  Punctuated Evolution of Prostate Cancer Genomes , 2013, Cell.

[32]  D. Chakravarty,et al.  Transcriptome and Proteome Analyses of TNFAIP8 Knockdown Cancer Cells Reveal New Insights into Molecular Determinants of Cell Survival and Tumor Progression. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[33]  B K Slinker,et al.  The statistics of synergism. , 1998, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[34]  Wei Yuan,et al.  DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Lawrence D. True,et al.  Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[36]  Parantu K. Shah,et al.  Targeting Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase and the c-Myb–Regulated DNA Damage Response Pathway in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer , 2014, Science Signaling.

[37]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[38]  J. Waxman,et al.  Bone metastasis in prostate cancer: emerging therapeutic strategies , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[39]  D. Gioeli,et al.  The convergence of DNA damage checkpoint pathways and androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer. , 2014, Endocrine-related cancer.

[40]  P. Troncoso,et al.  Neuroendocrine prostate cancer xenografts with large‐cell and small‐cell features derived from a single patient's tumor: Morphological, immunohistochemical, and gene expression profiles , 2011, The Prostate.

[41]  M. Tarsounas,et al.  RAD51 paralogs: roles in DNA damage signalling, recombinational repair and tumorigenesis. , 2011, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[42]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  Initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer: 2006 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  M. Jasin,et al.  Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[44]  M. Scaltriti,et al.  The emerging role of serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinases in cancer , 2017, Cell cycle.