Combining discrete choice and informed sensory testing in a two-stage process: can it predict wine market share?

Abstract An online discrete choice experiment was combined with a separate informed sensory hedonic test in a two-stage process to understand the interplay of wine sensory characteristics and extrinsic attributes such as packaging, price and brand awareness. This approach simulated the process of a consumer choosing a product from the shelf, tasting the product, and making a repurchase decision. The response measures were validated by relating them to market sales data. Twenty-one commercial Australian Shiraz red wines were characterised by a trained sensory panel. Four hundred and twenty-six regular wine consumers chose a wine for a dinner with friends from simulated shelves of the wines represented by photographs. Their choices were mainly a result of extrinsic wine attributes and the frequency of choice was found to be highly related to a wine’s market share. The same consumers evaluated liking and made a repurchase decision in a central location tasting in an incomplete design, which included photos of each of the 21 wines. Price was found to be a strong positive driver of informed liking, and liking did not relate to the sales volume or to the initial choice in the online experiment. In contrast, the previously measured online choice was a strong predictor for repurchase with tasting, confirming that both product expectations at the initial purchase and intrinsic sensory attributes during product consumption substantially influence the repurchase decision. A number of common sensory characteristics were also positively and negatively related to both liking and repurchase intent. The study provided an insight into the relative importance of product expectation and actual sensory experience on informed repurchase intent. The combination of the discrete choice methodology with sensory descriptive data and consumer sensory testing shows promise.

[1]  Hye-Seong Lee,et al.  Sensory difference tests: Overdispersion and warm-up , 2007 .

[2]  Pascale Quester,et al.  Tasting quality: the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic cues , 2009 .

[3]  K. Grunert.  Purchase and consumption: the interdisciplinary nature of analysing food choice , 2003 .

[4]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  Methodology and theory in human eating research , 1992, Appetite.

[5]  E. Köster,et al.  The relevance of initial hedonic judgements in the prediction of subtle food choices , 1999 .

[6]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  When Do Purchase Intentions Predict Sales? , 2006 .

[7]  Julien Delarue,et al.  Central location test vs. home use test: Contrasting results depending on product type , 2007 .

[8]  Wine's placebo effect: How the extrinsic cues of visual assessments mask the intrinsic quality of South African red wine , 2006 .

[9]  C. Petit,et al.  Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence? , 2007 .

[10]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  HOW WELL DOES THE 9‐POINT HEDONIC SCALE PREDICT PURCHASE FREQUENCY? , 2005 .

[11]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics , 1998 .

[12]  Mary Ellen Soper.  What You See May Not Be What You Get:: Errors in Online Bibliographic Records for Serials , 1990 .

[13]  Jean-Xavier Guinard,et al.  COMPARISON OF MONADIC AND SIMULTANEOUS SAMPLE PRESENTATION MODES IN A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF MILK CHOCOLATE , 1999 .

[14]  Deborah J. Street,et al.  The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments , 2007 .

[15]  K. Grunert.  Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand , 2005 .

[16]  C. Manski.  The Use of Intentions Data to Predict Behavior: A Best-Case Analysis , 1990 .

[17]  Larry Lockshin,et al.  What you see may not be what you get: Asking consumers what matters may not reflect what they choose , 2010 .

[18]  J. A. G. Griffith,et al.  The voice of the consumer , 1950 .

[19]  E. Köster,et al.  Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurement: a conceptual exploration , 2003 .

[20]  Larry Lockshin,et al.  Comparison of best–worst and hedonic scaling for the measurement of consumer wine preferences , 2009 .

[21]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp,et al.  Quality guidance: a consumer based approach to food quality improvement using Partial Least Squares. , 1996 .

[23]  Hely Tuorila,et al.  Hedonic responses as predictors of food choice: Flexibility and self-prediction , 2007, Appetite.

[24]  M. Aparecida,et al.  Hedonic scale with reference: performance in obtaining predictive models , 2002 .

[25]  Kai Kristensen,et al.  Quality guidance and quality formation , 1996 .

[26]  Paolo Masi,et al.  The effect of expectations generated by brand name on the acceptability of dried semolina pasta , 2004 .

[27]  L. Lähteenmäki,et al.  Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices , 2006, Appetite.

[28]  Akshay R. Rao,et al.  The Quality of Price as a Quality Cue , 2005 .

[29]  Sylvie Issanchou,et al.  Expectation, liking and purchase behaviour under economical constraint , 1998 .

[30]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Analytical characterization of the aroma of five premium red wines. Insights into the role of odor families and the concept of fruitiness of wines. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[31]  R. Haller,et al.  From sensory marketing to sensory design: How to drive formulation using consumers’ input? , 2008 .

[32]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods, liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price , 1996 .

[33]  D. Romano,et al.  Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods : Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story? , 2006 .

[34]  E. Köster.  Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective , 2009 .

[35]  James A. Kennedy,et al.  Effects of Bottle Closure Type on Consumer Perceptions of Wine Quality , 2007, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[36]  F. Norwood,et al.  How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior? , 2009 .

[37]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity , 1999 .

[38]  Sylvie Issanchou,et al.  Food choices: What do we learn from combining sensory and economic experiments? , 2009 .

[39]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Terminology, reliability, validity, and subjectivity in the search for the “voice of the consumer” , 2005 .

[40]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  THE GENERATION OF SENSORY EXPECTATION BY EXTERNAL CUES AND ITS EFFECT ON SENSORY PERCEPTION AND HEDONIC RATINGS: A REVIEW , 1996 .

[41]  David Marshall,et al.  Examining the relationship between product package colour and product selection in preschoolers , 2006 .

[42]  J. Lee,et al.  The Best–Worst Scaling Approach: An Alternative to Schwartz's Values Survey , 2008, Journal of personality assessment.

[43]  D. Street,et al.  The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods by STREET, D. J. and BURGESS, L. , 2007 .

[44]  Zata M Vickers,et al.  Incorporating Tasting into a conjoint Analysis of Taste, Health Claim, Price and brand for Purchasing Strawberry Yogurt. , 1993 .

[45]  Imran S. Currim,et al.  Using Segmentation Approaches for Better Prediction and Understanding from Consumer Mode Choice Models , 1981 .

[46]  Creating memorable products: Actual liking and remembered liking , 2006 .

[47]  B. Wansink,et al.  Fine as North Dakota wine: Sensory expectations and the intake of companion foods , 2006, Physiology & Behavior.

[48]  U. Enneking,et al.  How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision , 2007 .

[49]  L. Bredahl.  Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef , 2002 .

[50]  P. Quester,et al.  Do consumer expectations match experience? Predicting the influence of price and country of origin on perceptions of product quality , 2009 .

[51]  M. B. Frøst.  Liking and exposure: First, second and tenth time around , 2006, Physiology & Behavior.

[52]  Pascal Schlich,et al.  Internal and external mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers : comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price , 2001 .

[53]  F. M. Kramer,et al.  A comparison between liking ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions: the role of choice , 2005, Appetite.

[54]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Consumer acceptance of cheese, influence of different testing conditions , 2005 .

[55]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .

[56]  R. Pangborn,et al.  The Time-Course of Astringency in Wine upon Repeated Ingestion , 1986, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[57]  I. Francis,et al.  Consumer acceptability, sensory properties and expert quality judgements of Australian Cabernet Sauvignon and Shiraz wines. , 2010 .

[58]  K. Grunert,et al.  Comparing methods for measuring consumer willingness to pay for a basic and an improved ready made soup product , 2009 .

[59]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[60]  H. Martens,et al.  Modified Jack-knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modelling by partial least squares regression (PLSR) , 2000 .

[61]  M. Hetherington,et al.  Stimulus satiation: effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake , 2002, Appetite.

[62]  A. Brzozowska,et al.  Hedonic tests in different locations as predictors of apple juice consumption at home in elderly and young subjects , 2003 .

[63]  Peter Zweifel,et al.  Validity of discrete-choice experiments evidence for health risk reduction , 2007 .

[64]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Expectations influence sensory experience in a wine tasting , 2009, Appetite.

[65]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers , 1990 .

[66]  Loran F. Nordgren,et al.  The Devil Is in the Deliberation: Thinking Too Much Reduces Preference Consistency , 2009 .

[67]  Lawrence L. Garber,et al.  Measuring consumer response to food products , 2003 .

[68]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Testing the external validity of hierarchical conjoint analysis models of recreational destination choice , 1992 .

[69]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  Adjusting Stated Intention Measures to Predict Trial Purchase of New Products: A Comparison of Models and Methods , 1989 .

[70]  Sylvie Issanchou,et al.  Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: comparison with hedonic scores , 2002 .

[71]  Francisco Javier Lloréns Montes,et al.  Measuring perceptions of quality in food products: the case of red wine , 2004 .

[72]  L. Lockshin,et al.  Using Means-End Chains for Analysing Occasions - Not Buyers , 2000 .