Impact of flame-wall interaction on premixed flame dynamics and transfer function characteristics

Abstract In this paper, we numerically investigate the response of a perforated-plate stabilized laminar methane–air premixed flame to imposed inlet velocity perturbations. A flame model using detailed chemical kinetics mechanism is applied and heat exchange between the burner plate and the gas mixture is incorporated. Linear transfer functions, for low mean inlet velocity oscillations, are analyzed for different equivalence ratio, mean inlet velocity, plate thermal conductivity and distance between adjacent holes. The oscillations of the heat exchange rate at the top of the burner surface plays a critical role in driving the growth of the perturbations over a wide range of conditions, including resonance. The flame response to the perturbations at its base takes the form of consumption speed oscillations in this region. Flame stand-off distance increases/decreases when the flame-wall interaction strengthens/weakens, impacting the overall dynamics of the heat release. The convective lag between the perturbations and the flame base response govern the phase of heat release rate oscillations. There is an additional convective lag between the perturbations at the flame base and the flame tip which has a weaker impact on the heat release rate oscillations. At higher frequencies, the flame-wall interaction is weaker and the heat release oscillations are driven by the flame area oscillations. The response of the flame to higher amplitude oscillations are used to gain further insight into the mechanisms.

[1]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Regular Article: A Semi-implicit Numerical Scheme for Reacting Flow , 1999 .

[2]  S. Candel,et al.  Theoretical and experimental determinations of the transfer function of a laminar premixed flame , 2000 .

[3]  Ahmed F. Ghoniem,et al.  Two-dimensional simulations of steady perforated-plate stabilized premixed flames , 2010 .

[4]  S. Candel,et al.  A unified model for the prediction of laminar flame transfer functions: comparisons between conical and V-flame dynamics , 2003 .

[5]  J. F. Clarke,et al.  A Numerical Study of Tunnel Fires , 1984 .

[6]  A. Annaswamy,et al.  Modeling the dynamic response of a laminar perforated-plate stabilized flame , 2009 .

[7]  S. Candel,et al.  Modeling tools for the prediction of premixed flame transfer functions , 2002 .

[8]  Tim Lieuwen,et al.  Modeling Premixed Combustion-Acoustic Wave Interactions: A Review , 2003 .

[9]  S. Candel,et al.  Combustion Dynamics and Instabilities: Elementary Coupling and Driving Mechanisms , 2003 .

[10]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames , 1981 .

[11]  A. C. MclNTOSH Combustion-Acoustic Interaction of a Flat Flame Burner System Enclosed Within an Open Tube , 1987 .

[12]  S. Candel,et al.  Experimental analysis of nonlinear flame transfer functions for different flame geometries , 2009 .

[13]  A. Annaswamy,et al.  Response of a laminar premixed flame to flow oscillations: A kinematic model and thermoacoustic instability results , 1996 .

[14]  Sébastien Candel,et al.  Combustion dynamics and control: Progress and challenges , 2002 .

[15]  R Rook,et al.  Response of burner-stabilized flat flames to acoustic perturbations , 2002 .

[16]  Prashant G. Mehta,et al.  Impact of exothermicity on steady and linearized response of a premixed ducted flame , 2005 .

[17]  A. Mclntosh,et al.  The Effect of Upstream Acoustic Forcing and Feedback on the Stability and Resonance Behaviour of Anchored Flamest , 1986 .

[18]  Goey de Lph,et al.  The acoustic response of burner-stabilized premixed flat flames , 2002 .

[19]  J. F. Clarke,et al.  Second order theory of unsteady burner-anchored flames with arbitrary Lewis Number , 1983 .

[20]  V. N. Kornilov,et al.  Experimental assessment of the acoustic response of laminar premixed Bunsen flames , 2007 .