Competition for light between phytoplankton species : Experimental tests of mechanistic theory

According to recent competition theory, the population dynamics of phy- toplankton species in monoculture can be used to make a priori predictions of the dynamics and outcome of competition for light. The species with lowest ''critical light intensity'' should be the superior light competitor. To test this theory, we ran monoculture experiments and competition experiments with two green algae (Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus protuberans) and two cyanobacteria (Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and a Microcystis strain) in light-limited continuous cultures. We used the monoculture experiments to estimate the critical light intensities of the species. Scenedesmus had by far the highest critical light intensity. The critical light intensities of Chlorella, Aphanizomenon,and Microcystis were rather similar. According to observation, Aphanizomenonhad a slightly lower critical light intensity than Chlorella and Microcystis. However, according to a model fit to the mono- culture experiments, Chlorella had a slightly lower critical light intensity than Microcystis, which in turn had a slightly lower critical light intensity than Aphanizomenon.These subtle differences between observed and fitted critical light intensities could be attributed to differences in the light absorption spectra of the species. The competition experiments were all consistent with the competitive ordering of the species according to the fitted critical light intensities: Chlorella displaced all three other species, Microcystis displaced both Aphanizomenon and Scenedesmus, and Aphanizomenon only displaced Scenedesmus. Not only the final outcomes, but also the time courses of competition predicted by the theory, were in excellent agreement with the experimental results for nearly all species combi- nations.

[1]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton , 1984 .

[2]  T. Platt,et al.  Primary production by phytoplankton : analytic solutions for daily rates per unit area of water surface , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  L. R. Mur,et al.  Some experiments on the competition between green algae and blue‐green bacteria in light‐limited environments , 1977 .

[4]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Growth and competition in a light gradient , 1994 .

[5]  U. Sommer.  Phytoplankton competition in Plußsee: a field test of the resource-ratio hypothesis , 1993 .

[6]  C. Steinberg,et al.  Planktonic bloom-forming Cyanobacteria and the eutrophication of lakes and rivers , 1988 .

[7]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[8]  W Stokdijk,et al.  Optical plankton analyser: a flow cytometer for plankton analysis, II: Specifications. , 1989, Cytometry.

[9]  H. Paerl.  Nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters1 , 1988 .

[10]  K. Rothhaupt.  Laboratorary Experiments with a Mixotrophic Chrysophyte and Obligately Phagotrophic and Photographic Competitors , 1996 .

[11]  C. Duarte,et al.  Phytoplankton abundance in Florida lakes : evidence for the frequent lack of nutrient limitation , 1990 .

[12]  B. Osborne,et al.  Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1985 .

[13]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[14]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Single-nutrient microbial competition: qualitative agreement between experimental and theoretically forecast outcomes. , 1980, Science.

[15]  D. Söndgerath,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Ecology: The Link between Data and Models , 1990 .

[16]  H. Matthijs,et al.  Blooming of cyanobacteria in turbulent water with steep light gradients: The effect of intermittent light and dark periods on the oxygen evolution capacity of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 , 1995 .

[17]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Competition for Nutrients and Light in a Mixed Water Column: A Theoretical Analysis , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[18]  T. T. Bannister.  Production equations in terms of chlorophyll concentration, quantum yield, and upper limit to production , 1974 .

[19]  J. Huisman.  POPULATION DYNAMICS OF LIGHT-LIMITED PHYTOPLANKTON: MICROCOSM EXPERIMENTS , 1999 .

[20]  H. Matthijs,et al.  Application of light‐emitting diodes in bioreactors: Flashing light effects and energy economy in algal culture (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  On the Dominance of filamentous cyanobacteria in shallow, turbid lakes , 1997 .

[22]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Light-limited growth and competition for light in well-mixed aquatic environments : An elementary model , 1994 .

[23]  D. Tilman.  Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach , 1977 .

[24]  J. Huisman,et al.  COMPETITION BETWEEN A PROCHLOROPHYTE AND A CYANOBACTERIUM UNDER VARIOUS PHOSPHORUS REGIMES: COMPARISON WITH THE DROOP MODEL , 1998 .

[25]  L. R. Mur,et al.  Growth Kinetics of Oscillatoria agardhii Gomont in Continuous Culture, Limited in its Growth by the Light Energy Supply , 1979 .

[26]  James P. Grover,et al.  Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to the Variable-Internal-Stores Model , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[27]  C. Duarte,et al.  Patterns in phytoplankton community structure in Florida lakes , 1992 .

[28]  E. Donk,et al.  TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON SILICON‐ AND PHOSPHORUS‐LIMITED GROWTH AND COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS AMONG THREE DIATOMS 1 , 1990 .

[29]  J. Ringelberg,et al.  Flow cytometry: A powerful tool in analysis of biomass distributions in phytoplankton , 1995 .

[30]  T. Tsuji,et al.  Improved fluorescent microscopy for measuring the standing stock of phytoplankton including fragile components , 1981 .