Haptic Detection of Sine-Wave Gratings

We studied human haptic perception of sine-wave gratings. In the first experiment we measured the dependence of amplitude detection thresholds on the number of cycles and on the wavelength of the gratings. In haptic perception of sine-wave gratings, the results are in agreement with neural summation. The rate at which detection thresholds decrease with increasing number of cycles is much higher than can be accounted for by probability summation alone. Further, neural summation mechanisms describe the detection thresholds accurately over the whole spatial range probed in the experiment, that is wavelengths from 14 mm up to 225 mm. Earlier, we found a power-law dependence of thresholds on the spatial width of Gaussian profiles (Louw et al, 2000 Experimental Brain Research 132 369–374). The current results extend these findings; the power-law dependence holds not only for Gaussian profiles, but also for a broad range of sine-wave gratings with the number of cycles varying between 1 and 8. Haptic perception involves tactual scanning combined with an active, dynamic exploration of the environment. We measured characteristics of the velocity and force with which stimuli were scanned while performing a psychophysical task. One particularly surprising finding was that, without being instructed, participants maintained an almost constant scanning velocity during each 45-min session. A constant velocity in successive trials of the experiment might facilitate or even be necessary for discrimination. Further, a large systematic dependence of velocity on scanning length was found. An eightfold increase in scanning length resulted in about a fourfold increase in scanning velocity. A second experiment was conducted to study the influence of scanning velocity on psychophysical detection thresholds. This was done by systematically imposing specific scanning velocities to the participants while the thresholds were measured. The main result of the second experiment was that psychophysical detection thresholds are constant over a relatively broad range of scanning velocities.

[1]  F. Freeman.  Experimental analysis of the writing movement. , 1914 .

[2]  A. Iserles.  Numerical recipes in C—the art of scientific computing , by W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky and W. T. Vetterling. Pp 735. £27·50. 1988. ISBN 0-521-35465-X (Cambridge University Press) , 1989, The Mathematical Gazette.

[3]  K. Sathian,et al.  Temporal Cues Contribute to Tactile Perception of Roughness , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Ehud Ahissar,et al.  Importance of Temporal Cues for Tactile Spatial- Frequency Discrimination , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Similar mechanisms underlie curvature comparison by static and dynamic touch , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Relation between Hearing Threshold and Duration for Tone Pulses , 1959 .

[7]  J. McCann,et al.  Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine-wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation , 2002, Somatosensory & motor research.

[9]  R. Quick.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection , 2004, Kybernetik.

[10]  I. Gordon,et al.  The haptic perception of curvature , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  G. Lamb.  Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[13]  P. Viviani,et al.  The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements , 1983, Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Zwislocki.  Theory of Temporal Auditory Summation , 1960 .

[15]  Avi Pfeffer,et al.  INFLUENCE OF , 2014 .

[16]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Haptic detection thresholds of Gaussian profiles over the whole range of spatial scales , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  C. Tyler,et al.  Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation , 2000, Vision Research.

[18]  Quick Rf.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[19]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Directional control of planar human arm movement. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P W Davidson,et al.  Haptic judgments of curvature by blind and sighted humans. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  M. Mayer,et al.  Invariance of the slope of the psychometric function with spatial summation. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  B. Berglund,et al.  Temporal Integration of Vibrotactile Stimulation , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  F A Bilsen,et al.  The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. , 1974, Vision research.

[24]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Active haptic detection and discrimination of shape , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Haptic discrimination of stimuli varying in amplitude and width , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Suprathreshold contrast perception and complex random textures , 1978, Vision Research.

[28]  Modelling spatial vision at the threshold level. , 1992, Spatial vision.

[29]  O. Franzén.  On spatial summatin in the tactual sense. A psychophysical and neurophysiological study. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[30]  Carl E. Sherrick,et al.  The role of skin coupling in the determination of vibrotactile spatial summation , 1969 .

[31]  The effect of number of pulses on vibrotactile thresholds , 1965 .

[32]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Visibility of blobs with a gaussian luminance profile , 1989, Vision Research.

[33]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile discrimination of curvature by humans using only cutaneous information from the fingerpads , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  M. Hollins,et al.  Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Detectability of power fluctuations of temporal visual noise , 1978, Vision Research.

[36]  D. H. Kelly.  Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina , 1975, Vision Research.

[37]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[38]  S J Bolanowski,et al.  Vibrotactile temporal summation: probability summation or neural integration? , 1999, Somatosensory & motor research.