Transparency about a Robot's Lack of Human Psychological Capacities

The increasing sophistication of social robots has intensified calls for transparency about robots’ machine nature. Initial research has suggested that providing children with information about robots’ mechanical status does not alter children's humanlike perception of, and relationship formation with, social robots. Against this background, our study experimentally investigated the effects of transparency about a robot's lack of human psychological capacities (intelligence, self-consciousness, emotionality, identity construction, social cognition) on children's perceptions of a robot and their relationship to it. Our sample consisted of 144 children aged 8 to 9 years old who interacted with the Nao robot in either a transparent or a control condition. Transparency decreased children's humanlike perception of the robot in terms of animacy, anthropomorphism, social presence, and perceived similarity. Transparency reduced child-robot relationship formation in terms of decreased trust, while children's feelings of closeness toward the robot were not affected.

[1]  K. Darling.  'Who's Johnny?' Anthropomorphic Framing in Human-Robot Interaction, Integration, and Policy , 2015 .

[2]  Heather E. Gary,et al.  Children's Social Relationships With Current and Near‐Future Robots , 2013 .

[3]  M. King,et al.  Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing , 2000 .

[4]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[5]  van de Mortel,et al.  Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research , 2008 .

[6]  Matthias Scheutz.  The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds between Humans and Social Robots , 2009 .

[7]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  INVESTIGATING CHILDREN'S ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBOTS: A CASE STUDY , 1999 .

[8]  Nirit Bauminger-Zviely,et al.  Young Friendship in HFASD and Typical Development: Friend Versus Non-friend Comparisons , 2014, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[9]  C. Bartneck,et al.  Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots , 2008, HRI 2008.

[10]  M. Mason,et al.  Mind Perception , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[11]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Child-Robot Interactions for Second Language Tutoring to Preschool Children , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Steven J. Stroessner,et al.  The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and Validation , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[14]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[15]  J. Peter,et al.  Closeness, trust, and perceived social support in child-robot relationship formation , 2020 .

[16]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Personalising game difficulty to keep children motivated to play with a social robot: A Bayesian approach , 2017, Cognitive Systems Research.

[17]  Patrick Lin,et al.  The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds between Humans and Social Robots , 2012 .

[18]  Amy I. Nathanson,et al.  Counteracting the Effects of Female Stereotypes on Television via Active Mediation , 2002 .

[19]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  How to describe and evaluate “deception” phenomena: recasting the metaphysics, ethics, and politics of ICTs in terms of magic and performance and taking a relational and narrative turn , 2018, Ethics and Information Technology.

[21]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  T. Huston,et al.  The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. , 1980 .

[23]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .

[24]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Liking versus loving: A comparative evaluation of theories. , 1987 .

[25]  U. Neisser.  Five kinds of self‐knowledge , 1988 .

[26]  Frances Griffiths,et al.  Children's Perception and Interpretation of Robots and Robot Behaviour , 2010, HRPR.

[27]  V. Morrow.  My Animals and Other Family: Children's Perspectives on their Relationships with Companion Animals , 1998 .

[28]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges , 2013, ICSR.

[29]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures , 2008 .

[30]  K. Crowley,et al.  Searching for Signs of Intelligent Life: An Investigation of Young Children's Beliefs About Robot Intelligence , 2008 .

[31]  Emily C. Collins.  Vulnerable users: deceptive robotics , 2017, Connect. Sci..

[32]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent , 2008 .

[33]  M. Hertzig,et al.  Treasured objects in school-aged children. , 1981, Pediatrics.

[34]  J. Kihlstrom.  The psychological unconscious. , 1990 .

[35]  D. Dennett.  Conditions of Personhood , 1988 .

[36]  Eva Hoff.  Imaginary Companions, Creativity, and Self-Image in Middle Childhood , 2005 .

[37]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Psychology of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[38]  S. Turkle.  Authenticity in the age of digital companions , 2007 .

[39]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE OF PERCEIVED HOMOPHILY IN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[40]  R. Arkin,et al.  Robots, Ethics, and Intimacy: The Need for Scientific Research , 2019, Philosophical Studies Series.

[41]  Joanne Cantor,et al.  Reducing the Aggression-Promoting Effect of Violent Cartoons By Increasing Children's Fictional Involvement with the Victim: A Study of Active Mediation , 2000 .

[42]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[43]  D. Ames,et al.  Inside the mind reader's tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[45]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Review of Human Studies Methods in HRI and Recommendations , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[46]  N. Sharkey,et al.  The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal , 2010 .

[47]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[48]  Christof Koch,et al.  Do Androids Dream , 2015 .

[49]  Stephanie M. Carlson,et al.  Behaving as or behaving as if? Children's conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category , 2010, Neural Networks.

[50]  C. Dissanayake,et al.  Social Skills and Problem Behaviours in School Aged Children with High-Functioning Autism and Asperger’s Disorder , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[51]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[52]  Rachel L. Severson,et al.  Kids See Human Too: Adapting an Individual Differences Measure of Anthropomorphism for a Child Sample , 2016 .

[53]  Jochen Peter,et al.  Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research , 2019, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[54]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[55]  Barbara J. Wilson,et al.  The Effects of Sibling Coviewing on Preschoolers' Reactions to a Suspenseful Movie Scene , 1993 .

[56]  Jayson L. Dibble,et al.  Investigating the Relationships Among Child's Age, Parasocial Interactions, and the Social Realism of Favorite Television Characters , 2008 .

[57]  Jill Fain Lehman,et al.  Persistent Memory in Repeated Child-Robot Conversations , 2017, IDC.

[58]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Principles of robotics: regulating robots in the real world , 2017, Connect. Sci..

[59]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Transparency, teleoperation, and children's understanding of social robots , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[60]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .

[61]  Jochen Peter,et al.  Intentional acceptance of social robots: Development and validation of a self-report measure for children , 2020, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[62]  Jason Borenstein,et al.  Creating “companions” for children: the ethics of designing esthetic features for robots , 2014, AI & SOCIETY.

[63]  F. P. Hubbard.  'Do Androids Dream?': Personhood and Intelligent Artifacts , 2010 .

[64]  Megan S. Geerdts.  (Un)Real Animals: Anthropomorphism and Early Learning About Animals , 2016 .

[65]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effects of framing a robot as a social agent or as a machine on children's social behavior , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).