Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels.

Acoustic analysis of nasalized vowels in the frequency domain indicates the presence of extra peaks: one between the first two formants with amplitude P1 and one at lower frequencies, often below the first formant, with amplitude P0. The first-formant amplitude A1 is also reduced relative to its amplitude for an oral vowel. These acoustic characteristics can be explained by speech production theory. The objective of this study was to determine the values for the acoustic correlates A1-P1 and A1-P0 (dB) for quantifying nasalization. They were tested as measures of nasalization by comparing vowels between nasal consonants and those between stop consonants for English speakers. Also, portions of nasal vowels following a stop consonant were compared for speakers of French, which makes a linguistic distinction between oral and nasal vowels. In the analysis of English, the mean difference of A1-P1 measured in oral vowels and nasalized vowels had a range of 10 dB-15 dB; the difference of A1-P0 had a range of 6 dB-8 dB. In the study of French, the difference of A1-P1 measured between the least-nasalized portion and the most-nasalized portion of the vowel had a range of 9 dB-12 dB; for A1-P0, the difference ranged between 3 dB and 9 dB. In order to obtain an absolute acoustic measure of nasalization that was independent of vowel type, normalized parameters were calculated by adjusting for the influence of the vowel formant frequencies.

[1]  Osamu Fujimura,et al.  Nasalization of Vowels in Relation to Nasals , 1958 .

[2]  K. Moll,et al.  Velopharyngeal closure on vowels. , 1962, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  O. Fujimura,et al.  Sweep-tone measurements of vocal-tract characteristics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Daniloff,et al.  Investigation of the timing of velar movements during speech. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Assessment of nasalization in the speech of deaf children. , 1976, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  Shinji Maeda,et al.  Acoustic cues for vowel nasalization: A simulation study , 1982 .

[7]  S Hawkins,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Perception of vowel nasalization in VC contexts: A cross‐language study , 1987 .

[9]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Dang,et al.  Morphological and acoustical analysis of the nasal and the paranasal cavities. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Y. Chen,et al.  Acoustic parameters of nasalized vowels in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing speakers. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Dang,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of the human paranasal sinuses derived from transmission characteristic measurement and morphological observation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G Feng,et al.  Some acoustic features of nasal and nasalized vowels: a target for vowel nasalization. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.