Conserving natural resources in olive orchards on sloping land: Alternative goal programming approaches towards effective design of cross-compliance and agri-environmental measures

Olive farming on sloping land in southern Europe is facing multiple challenges and it is reasonable to believe that farmers will opt for the abandonment of some systems and intensification or change to organic production of other systems. The issues at stake surpass financial farm viability and two EU policy instruments - cross-compliance and agri-environmental measures (AEM) - are available to address environmental objectives. This paper explores how cross-compliance and AEM policy options may lead to shifts in olive production systems and their social and environmental effects in Tras-os-Montes, NE Portugal over 25 years under two sets of conditions of uncertainty: decision-making by land users and market scenarios. Uncertainty in decision-making is addressed by employing five alternative goal programming models. The models include Linear Programming (LP), Weighted Goal Programming (WGP) and MINMAX Goal Programming (MINMAX GP), the GP variants of which are moreover formulated from a societal (S) and farmer (F) perspective. Uncertainty in market prospects is addressed by projecting olive oil and labour prices and trends in farm subsidies, distinguishing four price combinations in market scenarios. The models were validated by their capability to reproduce the initial configuration of olive production systems. Six policy options are evaluated under the complete ranges of uncertainty factors in a total of 6 x 5 x 4 = 120 model runs. Results show overall large effects of farmer decision-making and market scenarios. The cross-compliance and AEM policy instruments have an unequivocal effect on environmental performance and help to maintain work in rural areas. However, farmer income levels are insensitive to the policies, all work is absorbed by family labour and important environmental issues linked to more intensive systems such as pollution are not addressed. In a case study with the WGP (F) model which best reproduced the initial configuration of production systems, cross-compliance was moreover found to burden farmers under adverse market conditions, while AEM contributed to farmer's objectives under favourable market conditions. A solution would be to focus cross-compliance regulations on intensive systems and offer appropriate AEM for traditional or abandoned orchards. Both policy instruments proved effective, but there is scope for removing substantial overlap between them.

[1]  L. Fleskens.  A typology of sloping and mountainous olive plantation systems to address natural resources management , 2008 .

[2]  C. Romero.  Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach , 2001 .

[3]  Kathrin Happe,et al.  Integrated assessment of future CAP policies: land use changes, spatial patterns and targeting , 2009 .

[4]  L. Stroosnijder,et al.  Is soil erosion in olive groves as bad as often claimed , 2007 .

[5]  N. Jones,et al.  Traditional olive orchards on sloping land: sustainability or abandonment? , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Juha Helenius,et al.  Measures of the EU Agri-Environmental Protection Scheme (GAEPS) and their impacts on the visual acceptability of Finnish agricultural landscapes. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Peter Carey,et al.  Performance of two agri-environment schemes in England: a comparison of ecological and multi-disciplinary evaluations , 2005 .

[8]  S. Siebert.  Traditional Agriculture and the Conservation of Biological Diversity in Crete, Greece , 2004 .

[9]  John M. Antle,et al.  Regional land use analysis : the development of operational tools , 2001 .

[10]  B. French,et al.  A Supply Response Model for Perennial Crops , 1971 .

[11]  P. Trivedi,et al.  Vintage production approach to perennial crop supply: An application to tea in major producing countries , 1987 .

[12]  W. Florkowski,et al.  Modeling Perennial Crop Supply: An Illustration from the Pecan Industry , 1993, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[13]  F. Herzog,et al.  Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[14]  Reimund P. Rötter,et al.  Integration of Systems Network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  Multi - scale modelling of land use change dynamics in Ecuador , 1999 .

[16]  M. Ittersum,et al.  Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models , 2007 .

[17]  R. A. Schipper,et al.  Farming in a fragile future : economics of land use with applications in the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica , 1996 .

[18]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[19]  Luuk Fleskens,et al.  Olive production systems on sloping land: prospects and scenarios. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Carlos Romero,et al.  On farmers' objectives: A multi-criteria approach , 1997 .

[21]  F. Sáenz-Segura,et al.  A seasonal model of contracts between a monopsonistic processor and smallholder pepper producers in Costa Rica , 2010 .

[22]  H. van Keulen,et al.  Application of interactive multiple goal programming techniques for analysis and planning of regional agricultural development. , 1988 .

[23]  Herman Van Keulen,et al.  Combining interactive multiple goal linear programming with an inter-stakeholder communication matrix to generate land use options , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Mehrdad Tamiz,et al.  Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  B. Devereux,et al.  The impact of changing olive cultivation practices on the ground flora of olive groves in the Messara and Psiloritis regions, Crete, Greece , 2006 .

[26]  L. Fleskens,et al.  A conceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agro-ecosystems: A case study of Trás-os-Montes olive groves , 2009 .

[27]  G. Flichman,et al.  Modelling the trade‐offs between farm income and the reduction of erosion and nitrate pollution , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[28]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Sustainability of forest management plans: a discrete goal programming approach. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  J. B. Dent,et al.  Goal programming: Application in the management of the miombo woodland in Mozambique , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  R. Rabbinge,et al.  Exploratory land use studies and their role in strategic policy making. , 1998 .

[31]  K. Happe,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Empirical based agent-based modeling Agent-based Analysis of Agricultural Policies: an Illustration of the Agricultural Policy Simulator AgriPoliS, its Adaptation and Behavior , 2006 .

[32]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions , 1989 .

[33]  J. Kovach,et al.  A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides , 1992 .

[34]  Alfons Balmann,et al.  Does structure matter? The impact of switching the agricultural policy regime on farm structures , 2008 .

[35]  Peter B. R. Hazell,et al.  Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. , 1987 .

[36]  Gilles Bergeron,et al.  Impact of policy interventions on land management in Honduras: results of a bioeconomic model , 1999 .