An experimental procedure for surface damage assessment in railway wheel and rail steels

The assessment of damage in rail–wheel cyclic contact requires considering the combined action of different damage mechanisms, such as wear, ratcheting, surface or subsurface crack nucleation and propagation. Models, usually requiring experimental calibration, are available for assessing these phenomena. The best way to calibrate them is based on cyclic contact tests, as these represent the real working conditions more closely. However, some experimental information, such as microstructural changes or crack paths, can be obtained only by destructive methods at the end of the tests, and their evolution cannot be monitored; other parameters, such as the wear rate, can only be determined during time consuming breaks to the tests. In this work, non destructive measurements of vibrations, torque and Barkhausen noise were introduced as indicators of damage evolution in cyclic contact tests on a high performance steel for railway wheels, coupled with a rail steel. In particular, their correlation with surface state, wear rate, subsurface microstructure and presence of cracks was shown.

[1]  W. R. Tyfour,et al.  Deterioration of rolling contact fatigue life of pearlitic rail steel due to dry-wet rolling-sliding line contact , 1996 .

[2]  Srečko Glodež,et al.  The influence of different parameters on surface pitting of contacting mechanical elements , 2004 .

[3]  L. H. Tanner,et al.  A comparison between talysurf 10 and optical measurements of roughness and surface slope , 1979 .

[4]  John H. Beynon,et al.  Dry rolling-sliding wear of bainitic and pearlitic steels , 1992 .

[5]  Pavel Mazal,et al.  An experimental investigation of rolling contact fatigue of steels using acoustic emission method , 2013 .

[6]  Linilson R. Padovese,et al.  Magnetic Barkhausen Noise and hysteresis loop in commercial carbon steel : influence of applied tensile stress and grain size , 2001 .

[7]  Jay Lee,et al.  Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications , 2014 .

[8]  Surface plastic strain in contact problems: Prediction by a simplified non-linear kinematic hardening model , 2009 .

[9]  Jim Brouzoulis,et al.  Wear impact on rolling contact fatigue crack growth in rails , 2012 .

[10]  G. Bertotti,et al.  Dependence of Barkhausen noise on grain size in ferromagnetic materials , 1990 .

[11]  A. Polycarpou,et al.  Correlation between laboratory ball-on-disk and full-scale rail performance tests , 2011 .

[12]  Elena Kabo,et al.  An engineering model for prediction of rolling contact fatigue of railway wheels , 2002 .

[13]  E. Kabo,et al.  Fatigue of railway wheels and rails under rolling contact and thermal loading—an overview , 2005 .

[14]  Candida Petrogalli,et al.  Vibration based diagnostics on rolling contact fatigue test bench , 2011 .

[15]  S. Bogdański,et al.  3D model of liquid entrapment mechanism for rolling contact fatigue cracks in rails , 2008 .

[16]  F. Franklin,et al.  Computer simulation of wear and rolling contact fatigue , 2001 .

[17]  Chester C.H. Lo,et al.  A review of the barkhausen effect and its applications to nondestructive testing , 2004 .

[18]  J Dearden.  THE WEAR OF STEEL RAILS : A REVIEW OF THE FACTORS INVOLVED. , 1954 .

[19]  C. Petrogalli,et al.  An integrated model for competitive damage mechanisms assessment in railway wheel steels , 2015 .

[20]  Roger Enblom,et al.  Simulation of railway wheel profile development due to wear : influence of disc braking and contact environment , 2005 .

[21]  David L. Atherton,et al.  Measurement of residual stress in steel using the magnetic Barkhausen noise technique , 1998 .

[22]  K. Farhangdoost,et al.  Effect of Lubricant on Surface Rolling Contact Fatigue Cracks , 2010 .

[23]  J. E. Garnham,et al.  Rolling contact fatigue of three pearlitic rail steels , 1996 .

[24]  B. Shaw,et al.  Magnetic Barkhausen Noise Profile Analysis: Effect of Excitation Field Strength and Detection Coil Sensitivity in Case Carburized Steel , 2014 .

[25]  Candida Petrogalli,et al.  Progressive damage assessment in the near-surface layer of railway wheel–rail couple under cyclic contact , 2011 .

[26]  Roger K. Steele,et al.  Observations of In-Service Wear of Railroad Wheels and Rails Under Conditions of Widely Varying Lubrication , 1982 .

[27]  Gerhard Poll,et al.  Wear of wheel-rail surfaces☆ , 1986 .

[28]  Andreas A. Polycarpou,et al.  Mechanical properties and wear performance of premium rail steels , 2007 .

[29]  S. Kumar,et al.  Wheel-Rail Contact Wear, Work, and Lateral Force for Zero Angle of Attack—A Laboratory Study , 1984 .

[30]  Yasubumi Furuya,et al.  The effect of grain boundary microstructure on Barkhausen noise in ferromagnetic materials , 2001 .

[31]  P. Bolton,et al.  Rolling—sliding wear damage in rail and tyre steels , 1984 .

[32]  K. Ara,et al.  Effect of Microstructure Changes on Barkhausen Noise Properties and Hysteresis Loop in Cold Rolled Low Carbon Steel , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[33]  Roberto Roberti,et al.  The competitive role of wear and RCF in a rail steel , 2005 .

[34]  Matthew J. Watson,et al.  Shaft coupling model-based prognostics enhanced by vibration diagnostics , 2009 .

[35]  J. Dearden,et al.  The wear of steel rails and tyres in railway service , 1960 .

[36]  Candida Petrogalli,et al.  Competition between wear and rolling contact fatigue at the wheel—rail interface: some experimental evidence on rail steel , 2009 .

[37]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Modern tribology handbook, Volume 1 , 2001 .

[38]  Ferruccio Resta,et al.  Wear of Railway Wheel Profiles: A Comparison between Experimental Results and a Mathematical Model , 2002 .

[39]  Francis Franklin,et al.  Modelling wear and crack initiation in rails , 2007 .