Making Sense of Polysemous Words Marjolijn Verspoor

Although it may be true that most vocabulary is acquired through incidental learning, acquiring words through inferring from context is not necessarily the most effective or efficient method in instructional settings. The guessing method has been advocated, but this method can be made more efficient and effective with insights from cognitive linguistics. In this article we argue that abstract, figurative senses of polysemous words are better retained when learners are given core senses as cues, because providing a core sense helps learners develop a ‘‘precise elaboration.’’ Results of a series of vocabulary experiments involving Dutch learners of English show that providing a core sense results in better guessing and long-term retention of figurative senses of polysemous words than not providing any cues or providing cues involving nonliteral senses.

[1]  J. Hulstijn,et al.  INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN A SECOND LANGUAGE: THE CONSTRUCT OF TASK-INDUCED INVOLVEMENT , 2001 .

[2]  Frank Boers,et al.  Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention , 2000 .

[3]  Frank Boers,et al.  Enhancing Metaphoric Awareness in Specialised Reading. , 2000 .

[4]  Marjolijn Verspoor,et al.  Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics , 1999 .

[5]  Murielle Demecheleer,et al.  A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions , 1998 .

[6]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[7]  Dirk Geeraerts,et al.  The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context , 1994 .

[8]  Annette M. B. de Groot,et al.  Word-Type Effects in Bilingual Processing Tasks: Support for a mixed-Representational System , 1993 .

[9]  S. Waxman Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. George Lakoff . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. Pp. xvii + 614. , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[10]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications , 1986 .

[11]  B. Laufer,et al.  Lexical Guessing in Context in EFL Reading Comprehension. , 1984 .

[12]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Differences in the precision of self-generated elaborations. , 1982 .

[13]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[14]  J. Hulstijn Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity , 2001 .

[15]  I. S. P. Nation,et al.  Learning Vocabulary in Another Language: Appendixes , 2001 .

[16]  Marjolijn H. Verspoor,et al.  True blue. A cognitive approach to vocabulary acquisition , 1997 .

[17]  Mirjam Woutersen,et al.  Bilingual word perception , 1997 .

[18]  James Coady,et al.  Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: PEDAGOGY , 1996 .

[19]  S. Krashen,et al.  Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in French as a Foreign Language. , 1993 .

[20]  Kata Ittzes Lexical Guessing in Isolation and Context. , 1991 .

[21]  L. Goossens,et al.  Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action , 1990 .

[22]  Ludovic Beheydt,et al.  The semantization of vocabulary in foreign language learning , 1987 .

[23]  E. Gagné The cognitive psychology of school learning , 1985 .

[24]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[25]  John R. Anderson Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .