Ranging in an Underwater Medium with Multiple Isogradient Sound Speed Profile Layers

In this paper, we analyze the problem of acoustic ranging between sensor nodes in an underwater environment. The underwater medium is assumed to be composed of multiple isogradient sound speed profile (SSP) layers where in each layer the sound speed is linearly related to the depth. Furthermore, each sensor node is able to measure its depth and can exchange this information with other nodes. Under these assumptions, we first show how the problem of underwater localization can be converted to the traditional range-based terrestrial localization problem when the depth information of the nodes is known a priori. Second, we relate the pair-wise time of flight (ToF) measurements between the nodes to their positions. Next, based on this relation, we propose a novel ranging algorithm for an underwater medium. The proposed ranging algorithm considers reflections from the seabed and sea surface. We will show that even without any reflections, the transmitted signal may travel through more than one path between two given nodes. The proposed algorithm analyzes them and selects the fastest one (first arrival path) based on the measured ToF and the nodes’ depth measurements. Finally, in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm we run several simulations and compare the results with other existing algorithms.

[1]  A. Coppens Simple equations for the speed of sound in Neptunian waters , 1981 .

[2]  Bryan W. Roberts,et al.  Waves in inhomogeneous media. , 1984 .

[3]  M. B. Porter Acoustic models and sonar systems , 1993 .

[4]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Absolute positioning of an autonomous underwater vehicle using GPS and acoustic measurements , 2005, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor network localization techniques , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[6]  Shengli Zhou,et al.  IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING (TO APPEAR) 1 Stratification Effect Compensation for Improved Underwater Acoustic Ranging , 2022 .

[7]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Effect of ocean sound speed uncertainty on matched-field geoacoustic inversion. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  A three dimensional localization algorithm for underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Wei Cheng,et al.  3D Underwater Sensor Network Localization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[11]  Lillykutty Jacob,et al.  Localization Using Ray Tracing for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Letters.

[12]  Winston K. G. Seah,et al.  A Survey of Techniques and Challenges in Underwater Localization , 2011 .

[13]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  A Survey of Architectures and Localization Techniques for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Geert Leus,et al.  Localization and tracking of a mobile target for an isogradient sound speed profile , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).