Using Interleaving to Promote Inductive Learning in Educational Contexts

Abstract. Inductive learning, that is, abstracting conceptual knowledge, rules, or principles from exemplars, plays a major role in educational settings, from literacy acquisition to mathematics and science learning. Interleaving exemplars of different categories rather than presenting blocks might be a simple but powerful way to improve inductive learning by supporting discriminative contrast. Although a consistent advantage of interleaving has been demonstrated for visual materials, relatively few studies have examined educationally relevant materials, such as mathematical tasks, science problems, and verbal materials, and their results are mixed. We discuss how interleaving could be made fruitful for school learning of mathematics, science, and literacy acquisition. We conclude that interleaving should be tailored to the specific learning content and combined with supportive instructional measures that assist students in comparing exemplars for discriminating features. Finally, we sketch research gaps that revolve around the use of interleaved learning in the classroom.

[1]  Veronica X. Yan,et al.  Interleaving Retrieval Practice Promotes Science Learning , 2021, Psychological science.

[2]  Steven C. Pan,et al.  Interleaved practice enhances memory and problem-solving ability in undergraduate physics , 2021, npj Science of Learning.

[3]  Sean H. K. Kang,et al.  Category similarity affects study choices in self-regulated learning , 2020, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Marissa K. Hartwig,et al.  The Scarcity of Interleaved Practice in Mathematics Textbooks , 2020 .

[5]  Marissa K. Hartwig,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of interleaved mathematics practice. , 2019, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[6]  Matthias Brunmair,et al.  Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. , 2019, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  D. Gentner,et al.  Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task , 2019, Cognition.

[8]  R. Treiman Teaching and Learning Spelling , 2018 .

[9]  Nate Kornell,et al.  In Inductive Category Learning, People Simultaneously Block and Space Their Studying Using a Strategy of Being Thorough and Fair , 2018 .

[10]  Esther Ziegler,et al.  The Relative Merits of Explicit and Implicit Learning of Contrasted Algebra Principles , 2018 .

[11]  Luke G. Eglington,et al.  Interleaved Presentation Benefits Science Category Learning , 2017 .

[12]  Veronica X. Yan,et al.  How Should Exemplars Be Sequenced in Inductive Learning? Empirical Evidence Versus Learners’ Opinions , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[13]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Sequence of Study Changes What Information Is Attended to, Encoded, and Remembered During Category Learning , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Promoting self-explanation to improve mathematics learning: A meta-analysis and instructional design principles , 2017 .

[15]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  People mind wander more during massed than spaced inductive learning. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Veronica X. Yan,et al.  On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Dan J. Woltz,et al.  Blocking as a friend of induction in verbal category learning , 2016, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Esther Ziegler,et al.  Consistent advantages of contrasted comparisons: Algebra learning under direct instruction , 2016 .

[19]  K. Begolli,et al.  Teaching Mathematics by Comparison: Analog Visibility as a Double-Edged Sword. , 2016 .

[20]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: Different tasks benefit from different schedules of study , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[21]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Different roads lead to Rome: the case of principle-based cognitive skills , 2015 .

[22]  Esther Ziegler,et al.  Delayed benefits of learning elementary algebraic transformations through contrasted comparisons , 2014 .

[23]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Mixing topics while studying does not enhance learning , 2014 .

[24]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  How Children Learn to Write Words , 2014 .

[25]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Katharina Galuschka,et al.  Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  Interleaved Practice Improves Mathematics Learning. , 2014 .

[28]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Instructional Complexity and the Science to Constrain It , 2013, Science.

[29]  E. Bjork,et al.  Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Sean H. K. Kang,et al.  Learning Painting Styles: Spacing is Advantageous when it Promotes Discriminative Contrast , 2012 .

[33]  J. McCabe Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al.  Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[35]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Flexible and adaptive use of strategies and representations in mathematics education , 2009 .

[36]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Compared With What? The Effects of Different Comparisons on Conceptual Knowledge and Procedural Flexibility for Equation Solving , 2009 .

[37]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Concepts and Categories , 2008, Psychological science.

[38]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. , 2007 .

[39]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning , 2007 .

[40]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  NORMAL AND IMPAIRED SPELLING IN A CONNECTIONIST DUAL-ROUTE ARCHITECTURE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[41]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[42]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[43]  Elizabeth Kay-Raining Bird,et al.  Reading and phonological awareness in children with Down syndrome: A longitudinal study , 2000 .

[44]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. , 1989 .