The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests

This investigation was conducted to examine the effects of insturctions designed to enhance ideational origianlity and flexibility, and to test the prediction that flexibility is functionally related to originality. Twenty-nine adolescents received three divergent thinking tests with conventional (inexplicit) instructions, one test with explicit originality instructions, and one test with explicit flexbility instructions. Contrary to expection, results indicated that originality scores were low when the adolescents were given the explicit flexiibility instructions. This suggests that flexibility does not facilitate originality. However, the explicit originality instructions did elicit the highest originality scores, and the explicit flexibility instructions elicited the highest flexibility scores.

[1]  R. Mayer.  Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition , 1983 .

[2]  M. Runco.  Teachers' Judgments of Creativity and Social Validation of Divergent Thinking Tests , 1984 .

[3]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Freedom and constraint in creativity. , 1988 .

[4]  H. Walker,et al.  Programming generalization and maintenance of treatment effects across time and across settings. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  N. Milgram,et al.  Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students. , 1976, Journal of educational psychology.

[6]  L. Shulman,et al.  Modes of thinking in young children , 1965 .

[7]  D M Harrington,et al.  Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. , 1975, Journal of personality.

[8]  J. Guilford.  Cognitive Psychology's Ambiguities: Some Suggested Remedies. , 1982 .

[9]  M. Runco,et al.  Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process , 1988, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[10]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Flexibility and Originality in Children's Divergent Thinking , 1986 .

[11]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[12]  M. Runco.  Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children , 1986 .

[13]  William B. Michael,et al.  The Effects of Scoring Formulas on the Discriminant Validity of Tests of Divergent Thinking , 1979 .

[14]  M. Runco,et al.  The Psychometric Properties of Four Systems for Scoring Divergent Thinking Tests , 1987 .

[15]  M. Runco.  Divergent Thinking and Creative Performance in Gifted and Nongifted Children , 1986 .

[16]  M. Runco.  Reliability and Convergent Validity of Ideational Flexibility as a Function of Academic Achievement , 1985 .

[17]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  An examination of the alleged role of "fixation" in the solution of several "insight" problems. , 1981 .

[18]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[19]  T. L. Belcher.  Modeling Original Divergent Responses: An Initial Investigation. , 1975 .

[20]  D. Hocevar,et al.  Intelligence, Divergent Thinking, and Creativity. , 1980 .

[21]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Facilitation of Performance on a Divergent Measure of Creativity: A Closer Look at Instructions to "Be Creative" , 1983 .

[22]  J. Hayes,et al.  Cognitive psychology : thinking and creating , 1978 .

[23]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications , 1968 .

[24]  F. Barron,et al.  Creativity and personal freedom , 1963 .