Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate if whole-body PET with FDG is able to detect bone marrow involvement in patients with multiple myeloma and to assess its appearance and distribution pattern. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventeen whole-body FDG PET scans were performed in 13 patients with multiple myeloma. Four patients were referred for evaluation of extent of disease pretherapy and nine patients were referred for assessment of therapy response (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, bone marrow transplant). FDG PET images were evaluated for distribution and uptake pattern. Standardized uptake values were obtained to quantify FDG uptake. Results of other imaging examinations (MRI, CT, radiography), laboratory data, biopsies, and the clinical course were used for verification of detected lesions. RESULTS FDG PET was able to detect medullary involvement of multiple myeloma. There were two false-negative results. In one patient, the radiographic skeletal survey showed subcentimeter lytic lesions within the ribs that were not detected on FDG PET and in the other patient, a lytic lesion detected on radiographs showed only mildly increased FDG uptake that was not identified prospectively. There was one false-positive FDG PET result in a patient who had undergone radiation therapy 3 weeks before PET. FDG PET was helpful in differentiating between posttherapeutic changes and residual/recurrent tumor and in assessing response to therapy. FDG PET resulted in upstaging of disease in four patients, which influenced subsequent management and prognosis. Sensitivity of FDG PET in detecting myelomatous involvement was 85% and specificity was 92%. CONCLUSION FDG PET is able to detect bone marrow involvement in patients with multiple myeloma. FDG PET is useful in assessing extent of disease at time of initial diagnosis, contributing to staging that is more accurate. FDG PET is also useful for evaluating therapy response.

[1]  G. Caputo,et al.  Value of FDG positron emission tomography in conjunction with MR imaging for evaluating therapy response in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  S. Salmon,et al.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival , 1975, Cancer.

[3]  M. Mulligan,et al.  PET/CT and MR imaging in myeloma , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[4]  B. Maldague,et al.  Skeletal survey in advanced multiple myeloma: radiographic versus MR imaging survey , 1999, British journal of haematology.

[5]  P. Wiernik Plasma cell dyscrasias and leukemias. , 2006, Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers.

[6]  L. Kostakoglu,et al.  Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma: is it time to shift gears? , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  R. Lamerz,et al.  Histologic, biochemical, and clinical parameters for monitoring multiple myeloma , 1991, Cancer.

[8]  H. Shirato,et al.  Early Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Extramedullary Plasmacytoma by Whole-Body F-18 FDG Positron Emission Tomography , 2000, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[9]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of solitary plasmacytoma. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[10]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Multiple myeloma: clinical review and diagnostic imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  F. Zhan,et al.  The role of the Wnt-signaling antagonist DKK1 in the development of osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  B. Line,et al.  Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[13]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-[18F]fluorouracil tissue concentrations measured with positron emission tomography in patients with liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma. , 1997, Cancer research.

[14]  L. Strauss,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography: Current Role for Diagnosis and Therapy Monitoring in Oncology. , 1997, The oncologist.

[15]  A. Guermazi,et al.  Prognostic value of vertebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with stage I multiple myeloma , 1999, British journal of haematology.

[16]  R W Günther,et al.  Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  P. Conti,et al.  Diagnostic utility of FDG PET in multiple myeloma , 2002, Skeletal Radiology.

[18]  H. Fukuda,et al.  PET imaging of primary mediastinal tumours. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1998 , 1998, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Treatment of multiple myeloma. , 2004, Blood.

[21]  P. Richardson,et al.  The emerging role of novel therapeutic agents in the management of patients with multiple myeloma , 2006 .

[22]  S. Barrington,et al.  Fluoro‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of occult disease in multiple myeloma , 2002, British journal of haematology.

[23]  H. Döhner,et al.  Initial results in the assessment of multiple myeloma using 18F-FDG PET , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[24]  J. Pouchot,et al.  Role for positron emission tomography in skeletal diseases. , 2007, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[25]  T. Wasserman,et al.  Plasmacytoma. Treatment results and conversion to myeloma , 1992, Cancer.

[26]  M. Steinling,et al.  La tomographie d'émission de positons en médecine interne : applications actuelles et perspectives d'avenir , 2006 .

[27]  R. Bataille,et al.  Bone scintigraphy in plasma-cell myeloma. A prospective study of 70 patients. , 1982, Radiology.

[28]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of solitary plasmacytoma of bone. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  M. Phelps,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography in oncology. , 1993, Oncology.

[30]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  K. Remes,et al.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging in screening myeloma lesions of the lumbar spine , 1995, British journal of haematology.