ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

[1]  Mark C Simmonds,et al.  A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis , 2016, Statistical methods in medical research.

[2]  R. Morris,et al.  Association and prediction of amniotic fluid measurements for adverse pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  Sally Hollis,et al.  A tool to assess the quality of a meta‐analysis , 2013, Research synthesis methods.

[4]  J. Glanville,et al.  Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  Dimitris Mavridis,et al.  A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis , 2013, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  Daniel M. Hartung,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults: A Systematic Review , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  Susan Mallett,et al.  QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  C. Bias.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011 .

[11]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines we can trust , 2011 .

[12]  Laura A. Levit,et al.  Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews , 2011 .

[13]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[14]  E. Tacconelli.  Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[16]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[17]  S. Puli,et al.  Can Endoscopic Ultrasound Predict Early Rectal Cancers That Can Be Resected Endoscopically? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review , 2010, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[18]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[19]  Patrick Bossuyt,et al.  Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies , 2008, The Lancet.

[22]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[23]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[24]  Penny Whiting,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access No Role for Quality Scores in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2005 .

[25]  G. Lu,et al.  Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2002 .

[27]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[30]  M. Egger,et al.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[31]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.

[32]  R. V. Van Howe.  Circumcision and HIV infection: review of the literature and meta-analysis. , 1999, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[33]  R. S. Howe,et al.  Circumcision and HIV Infection: Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis , 1999 .

[34]  C D Naylor,et al.  Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research , 1997, BMJ.

[35]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[36]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[37]  D. Sackett,et al.  Cochrane Collaboration , 1994, BMJ.

[38]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[39]  M. S. Patel,et al.  An introduction to meta-analysis. , 1989, Health Policy.