Paradoxical phenomenon in urban renewal practices: promotion of sustainable construction versus buildings’ short lifespan

The current urban renewal programs in some developing countries, such as China, are at the expense of demolishing a huge number of existing buildings without distinction. As a consequence, the buildings' short lifespan due to premature demolition and resultant adverse impacts on environment and society have been criticized for not being in line with sustainable development principles. This study therefore examines impacts of urban renewal practices on buildings' lifespan by referring to a typical urban renewal region in western China -- the Gailanxi region of Chongqing city which is considered representative. Findings show in current practices, little consideration is given to the implications of building demolitions across economic, social and environmental horizons collectively. As a result, premature demolition due to requirements of urban renewal has been a major factor leading to the significantly short lifespan of buildings. This is against the core intention of implementing urban renewal, which is promoting sustainability of the cities. Particularly, buildings' short lifespan results in consequences against sustainable construction principles, such as energy and resources waste, construction waste generation, environmental pollution, and higher lifecycle costs of buildings. Furthermore, building demolitions without distinction lead to losses of valuable historic buildings. Therefore, the urban renewal process presents a paradoxical phenomenon: the promotion of sustainable construction versus buildings' short lifespan. The dominance of economic consideration in the decision-making on buildings is considered as the underlying reason to the paradox. The learned experience presented in this study should be built into the decision-making process for carrying out future urban renewal programs.

[1]  Guangming Lin,et al.  Determination of strategic adaptation actions for public housing in Singapore , 2011 .

[2]  M. Leaf,et al.  The “Third Spring” of Urban Planning in China , 2006 .

[3]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. , 2011, Waste management.

[4]  Mingming Hu,et al.  Dynamic material flow analysis to support sustainable built environment development : with case studies on Chinese housing stock dynamics , 2010 .

[5]  Wei Yang,et al.  Simulation of the evolution of the Chinese building and infrastructure stock , 2008 .

[6]  Peter A. Bullen Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings , 2007 .

[7]  Jennifer O'Connor,et al.  Survey on actual service lives for North American buildings , 2004 .

[8]  Adam Yuet Chau,et al.  An awful mark: symbolic violence and urban renewal in reform‐era China , 2008 .

[9]  Laure Itard,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction , 2007 .

[10]  Fulong Wu,et al.  Residential relocation under market-oriented redevelopment: The process and outcomes in urban China , 2004 .

[11]  Vanderley Moacyr John,et al.  Durability in the Built Environment and Sustainability in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[12]  Li yin Shen,et al.  Adaptive reuse potential: An examination of differences between urban and non-urban projects , 2010 .

[13]  Chris Couch,et al.  Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain , 2000 .

[14]  The environmental industry in transitional China : barriers and opportunities between state and market , 2005 .

[15]  Fulong Wu,et al.  CHANGES IN TRADITIONAL URBAN AREAS AND IMPACTS OF URBAN REDEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF THREE NEIGHBOURHOODS IN NANJING, CHINA , 2005 .

[16]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Comparing life cycle implications of building retrofit and replacement options , 2005 .

[17]  Francis K.W. Wong,et al.  Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[18]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Is History Repeating Itself? , 2004 .

[19]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field , 2010 .

[20]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia , 2009 .

[21]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[22]  B. L. Golton Building obsolescence and the sustainability agenda , 1997 .

[23]  Livio D. DeSimone,et al.  Eco‐Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[24]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[25]  Wei Yang,et al.  Long-term management of building stocks , 2007 .

[26]  Lü Junhua Beijing's old and dilapidated housing renewal , 1997 .

[27]  Hongping Yuan A dynamic model for assessing the effectiveness of construction and demolition waste management , 2011 .

[28]  Dominic Stead,et al.  Policy integration in practice : the integration of land use planning, transport and environmental policy-making in Denmark, England and Germany , 2004 .

[29]  Hongping Yuan,et al.  Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. , 2011, Waste management.