This paper examines the impact of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) on Malaysia’s economy as well as challenges and responses of the government in countering this crisis. It argues that the impact of the GFC is different from the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis (AFC). The AFC impacted the financial industry with the resultant collapse of Malaysia’s currency, while the GFC impacted the export sector with direct repercussions on Malaysia’s real economy. This paper explores the structural weaknesses of Malaysia’s economy exposed by the GFC. Given that Malaysia’s economic growth had become more trade-dependent after the AFC, domestic investments, including foreign direct investments, could only grow anemically. This had jeopardized long-term economic growth and productivity, which were crucial in offsetting the impact of the GFC. This paper shows that the expansionary policies implemented by the government to counter the GFC were lacking in meaningful structural changes and could not yield the desirable results. Lastly, it assesses the extent to which the New Economic Model proposed by the present government could spur economic growth in dealing with the GFC.
[1]
Mirela-Oana Pintea,et al.
New Dimensions of Country Risk in the Context of the Current Crisis: A Case Study for Romania and Greece
,
2010
.
[2]
Tham Siew Yean,et al.
Malaysia ten years after the Asian financial crisis
,
2007
.
[3]
Jeff Tan.
Privatization in Malaysia: Regulation, Rent-seeking and Policy Failure
,
2007
.
[4]
E. Thalassinos,et al.
"Stock Markets' Integration Analysis"
,
2006
.
[5]
E. Thalassinos,et al.
The Greek capital market : caught in between poor corporate governance and market inefficiency
,
2006
.
[6]
Pearl M. Kamer.
The role of capital account controls in developing countries: lessons from Malaysia
,
2004
.