Part 2: The Phase-oriented Advice and Review Structure (PARS) for digital forensic investigations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sophia Mã ¶ ller,et al. Miscarriages Of Justice , 2016 .
[2] Eoghan Casey,et al. The Kodak Syndrome: Risks and Opportunities Created by Decentralization of Forensic Capabilities , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.
[3] Graeme Horsman,et al. Framework for Reliable Experimental Design (FRED): A research framework to ensure the dependable interpretation of digital data for digital forensics , 2018, Comput. Secur..
[4] C. Champod,et al. ENFSI guIdElINE For EvaluatIvE rEportINg IN ForENSIc ScIENcE Strengthening the Evaluation of Forensic Results across Europe ( STEOFRAE , 2015 .
[5] Dan Krane,et al. Letter to the Editor— Context Management Toolbox: A Linear Sequential Unmasking (LSU) Approach for Minimizing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decision Making , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.
[6] Eoghan Casey,et al. The chequered past and risky future of digital forensics , 2019, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences.
[7] Tim Watson,et al. Quality standards for digital forensics: Learning from experience in England & Wales , 2020, Digit. Investig..
[8] Glenn Langenburg,et al. “Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.
[9] Dustin J. Sleesman,et al. Putting Escalation of Commitment in Context: A Multilevel Review and Analysis , 2017 .
[10] Vince Thomson,et al. A review of research on cost of quality models and best practices , 2006 .
[11] Graeme Horsman,et al. A case-based reasoning method for locating evidence during digital forensic device triage , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..
[12] Katharina Wagner,et al. Digital Evidence And Computer Crime Forensic Science Computers And The Internet , 2016 .
[13] Graeme Horsman,et al. Tool testing and reliability issues in the field of digital forensics , 2019, Digit. Investig..
[14] Ankit Agarwal,et al. Systematic Digital Forensic Investigation Model , 2011 .
[15] Fakeeha Jafari,et al. Comparative Analysis of Digital Forensic Models , .
[16] Graeme Horsman,et al. Part 1: The need for peer review in digital forensics , 2020, Digit. Investig..
[17] Pietro Ortolani,et al. What is arbitration? , 2019, Understanding International Arbitration.
[18] Xiaoyu Du,et al. Evaluation of Digital Forensic Process Models with Respect to Digital Forensics as a Service , 2017, ArXiv.
[19] M. Petró‐Turza,et al. The International Organization for Standardization. , 2003 .
[20] Eugene H. Spafford,et al. Getting Physical with the Digital Investigation Process , 2003, Int. J. Digit. EVid..
[21] E. J. van Eijk,et al. Digital forensics as a service: Stepping up the game , 2020, Digit. Investig..
[22] Graeme Horsman,et al. "I couldn't find it your honour, it mustn't be there!" - Tool errors, tool limitations and user error in digital forensics. , 2018, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[23] I. Dror,et al. The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[24] Sherry Nakhaeizadeh,et al. Letter to the Editor — The Bias Snowball and the Bias Cascade Effects: Two Distinct Biases that May Impact Forensic Decision Making , 2017, Journal of forensic sciences.
[25] Zainuddin Hassan,et al. COMMON PHASES OF COMPUTER FORENSICS INVESTIGATION MODELS , 2011 .
[26] Brian Cusack. Extracting Benefits from Standardization of Digital Forensic Practices , 2019, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.
[27] Michael Welner,et al. Peer-Reviewed Forensic Consultation: Safeguarding Expert Testimony and Protecting the Uninformed Court , 2012 .
[28] E. J. van Eijk,et al. Digital Forensics as a Service: A game changer , 2014, Digit. Investig..
[29] Itiel E Dror,et al. ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work , 2019, Journal of forensic sciences.
[30] J. Bohan. Review of: Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2010 .
[31] R. Nickerson. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .
[32] Jan H. P. Eloff,et al. Framework for a Digital Forensic Investigation , 2006, ISSA.
[33] Charles E H Berger,et al. Cognitive biases in the peer review of bullet and cartridge case comparison casework: A field study. , 2020, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[34] David Watson,et al. Digital Forensics Processing and Procedures: Meeting the Requirements of ISO 17020, ISO 17025, ISO 27001 and Best Practice Requirements , 2013 .
[35] Ivar Andre Fahsing,et al. The making of an expert detective : Thinking and deciding in criminal investigations , 2016 .
[36] Graeme Horsman,et al. Formalising investigative decision making in digital forensics: Proposing the Digital Evidence Reporting and Decision Support (DERDS) framework , 2019, Digit. Investig..
[37] B. M. Staw. The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .
[38] Itiel E. Dror,et al. A Hierarchy of Expert Performance , 2016 .
[39] Ken Obenson,et al. The value of 100% retrospective peer review in a forensic pathology practice. , 2013, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.
[40] Jan H. P. Eloff,et al. Integrated digital forensic process model , 2013, Comput. Secur..
[41] G. Edmond,et al. Peer review in forensic science. , 2017, Forensic science international.
[42] Venansius Baryamureeba,et al. The Enhanced Digital Investigation Process Model , 2004 .
[43] Laetitia Heudt,et al. The introduction of forensic advisors in Belgium and their role in the criminal justice system. , 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[44] Dusya Vera,et al. Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning , 2004 .
[45] E. J. van Eijk,et al. Digital forensics as a service: Game on , 2015, Digit. Investig..
[46] Tony Adams,et al. Introducing Forensic and Criminal Investigation , 2013 .
[47] Nina Sunde. Non-technical sources of errors when handling digital evidence within a criminal investigation , 2017 .