A Geant4 shielding design for the first US carbon multi-ion hybrid synchrotron facility

The Mayo Clinic Florida Integrated Oncology Building will be the home of the first spot-scanning only carbon/proton hybrid therapy system by Hitachi, Ltd. It will provide proton beams up to kinetic energies of 230 MeV and carbon beams up to 430 MeV n−1 for clinical deployment. To provide adequate radiation protection, the Geant4 (v10.6) Monte Carlo toolkit was utilized to quantify the ambient dose equivalent at a 10 mm depth (H*(10)) for photons and neutrons. To perform accurate calculations of the ambient dose equivalent, three-dimensional computer-aided design files of the entire planned facility were imported into Geant4, as well as certain particle system components such as the bending magnets, fast Faraday cup, and gantry. Particle fluence was scored using 60 cm diameter spheres, which were strategically placed throughout areas of interests. Analytical calculations were performed as first-pass design checks. Major shielding slabs were optimized using Geant4 simulations iteratively, with more than 20 alternative designs evaluated within Geant4. The 430 MeV n−1 carbon beams played the most significant role in concrete thickness Requirements. The primary wall thickness for the carbon fixed beam room is 4 meters. The presence of the proton gantry structure in the simulation caused the ambient dose equivalent to increase by around 67% at the maze entrance, but a decrease in the high energy beam transport corridor. All shielding primary and secondary goals for clinical operations were met per state regulation and national guidelines.

[1]  S. Incerti,et al.  Report on G4-Med, a Geant4 benchmarking system for medical physics applications developed by the Geant4 Medical Simulation Benchmarking Group. , 2020, Medical physics.

[2]  K. Souček,et al.  Determination of durability of mortar with slag exposed to bacterial environment , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[3]  Wei Liu,et al.  Multiple energy extraction reduces beam delivery time for a synchrotron-based proton spot-scanning system , 2018, Advances in radiation oncology.

[4]  S. Incerti,et al.  Validation of Geant4 fragmentation for heavy ion therapy , 2017 .

[5]  S. Roesler,et al.  A Shielding Concept for the MedAustron Facility , 2017 .

[6]  R. Lark,et al.  An Investigation into the Use of Manufactured Sand as a 100% Replacement for Fine Aggregate in Concrete , 2016, Materials.

[7]  Julia Bauer,et al.  The FLUKA Code: An Accurate Simulation Tool for Particle Therapy , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[8]  Dennis H. Wright,et al.  The Geant4 Bertini Cascade , 2015 .

[9]  A. Mereghetti,et al.  Shielding data for hadron-therapy ion accelerators: Attenuation of secondary radiation in concrete , 2014 .

[10]  D. Durand,et al.  Benchmarking geant4 nuclear models for hadron therapy with 95 MeV/nucleon carbon ions , 2013, 1309.1544.

[11]  Koji Matsuda,et al.  Development of the compact proton beam therapy system dedicated to spot scanning with real-time tumor-tracking technology , 2013 .

[12]  A Mairani,et al.  Benchmarking nuclear models of FLUKA and GEANT4 for carbon ion therapy , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  K. Saito,et al.  CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF CARBON/PROTON SYNCHROTRON FOR PARTICLE BEAM THERAPY , 2010 .

[14]  Y. Jongen,et al.  Shielding Studies for a Hadron Therapy Center , 2009 .

[15]  Takashi S. Nakamura,et al.  Research on radiation protection in the application of new technologies for proton and heavy ion radiotherapy. , 2009, Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics.

[16]  Z. Zajacova,et al.  Shielding data for 100–250 MeV proton accelerators: Double differential neutron distributions and attenuation in concrete , 2007 .

[17]  Koji Noda,et al.  DEVELOPMENT FOR NEW CARBON CANCER-THERAPY FACILITY AND FUTURE PLAN OF HIMAC , 2006 .

[18]  U. Titt,et al.  Neutron shielding calculations in a proton therapy facility based on Monte Carlo simulations and analytical models: criterion for selecting the method of choice. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  G. Folger,et al.  The Binary Cascade , 2004 .

[20]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Geant4 - A simulation toolkit , 2003 .

[21]  E. Pedroni,et al.  Secondary neutron dose during proton therapy using spot scanning. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Uwe Titt,et al.  Neutron shielding verification measurements and simulations for a 235-MeV proton therapy center , 2002 .

[23]  J. H. Hough,et al.  Secondary Dose Exposures During 200 MeV Proton Therapy , 1997 .

[24]  M. Yudelev,et al.  Shielding and radiation safety around a superconducting cyclotron neutron therapy facility. , 1995, Health physics.

[25]  D. Dworak,et al.  Attenuation of the neutron dose equivalent in labyrinths through an accelerator shield , 1993 .