Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste.

The present study measures the participation of households in a source separation scheme and, in particular, if the household's application of the scheme improved after two interventions: (a) shorter distance to the drop-off point and (b) easy access to correct sorting information. The effect of these interventions was quantified and, as far as possible, isolated from other factors that can influence the recycling behaviour. The study was based on households located in an urban residential area in Sweden, where waste composition studies were performed before and after the interventions by manual sorting (pick analysis). Statistical analyses of the results indicated a significant decrease (28%) of packaging and newsprint in the residual waste after establishing a property close collection system (intervention (a)), as well as significant decrease (70%) of the miss-sorted fraction in bags intended for food waste after new information stickers were introduced (intervention (b)). Providing a property close collection system to collect more waste fractions as well as finding new communication channels for information about sorting can be used as tools to increase the source separation ratio. This contribution also highlights the need to evaluate the effects of different types of information and communication concerning sorting instructions in a property close collection system.

[1]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Conceptualising and analysing household attitudes and actions to a growing environmental problem: Development and application of a framework to guide local waste policy , 2005 .

[2]  Pilar L González-Torre,et al.  Influence of distance on the motivation and frequency of household recycling. , 2005, Waste management.

[3]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior , 1994 .

[4]  Jacob Hornik,et al.  Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results , 1995 .

[5]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Recycling in Multifamily Dwellings: Does Convenience Matter? , 2005 .

[6]  Coomaren P. Vencatasawmy,et al.  A survey of recycling behaviour in households in Kiruna, Sweden , 2000 .

[7]  Anna Bernstad,et al.  Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience. , 2014, Waste management.

[8]  Kamran Rousta,et al.  Assessing Incorrect Household Waste Sorting in a Medium-Sized Swedish City , 2013 .

[9]  Nils Brandt,et al.  Recycling Behaviour Among Householders: Synthesizing Determinants Via a Meta-analysis , 2013 .

[10]  Rajiv Kashyap,et al.  Consumer recycling: role of incentives, information, and social class , 2007 .

[11]  Kamran Rousta,et al.  EVALUATION THE INHABITANTS' PARTICIPATION IN SEPARATION AT SOURCE BY WASTE CHARACTERIZATION , 2011 .

[12]  Csaba Leitol Resource and cost efficient selective collection , 2014 .

[13]  J. Thøgersen Facilitating Recycling: Reverse—Distribution Channel Design for Participation and Support , 1997 .

[14]  David H. Folz Recycling Program Design, Management, and Participation: A National Survey of Municipal Experience , 1991 .

[15]  Raymond De Young,et al.  Exploring the Difference Between Recyclers and Non-Recyclers: The Role of Information , 1988 .

[16]  Mircea Horia Tierean,et al.  TRENDS IN SELECTIVE COLLECTION OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE , 2009 .

[17]  J. Thøgersen A model of recycling behaviour, with evidence from Danish source separation programmes , 1994 .

[18]  Denine Northrup,et al.  An information-motivation-behavioral skills assessment of curbside recycling behavior , 2010 .

[19]  Shaufique Fahmi Sidique,et al.  The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities , 2010 .

[20]  L. Derksen,et al.  The social context of recycling. , 1993 .

[21]  Anders Lagerkvist,et al.  Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden. , 2007, Waste management.

[22]  M. Ragazzi,et al.  Web-GIS oriented systems viability for municipal solid waste selective collection optimization in developed and transient economies. , 2013, Waste management.

[23]  Marco Ragazzi,et al.  3R'S FROM CITIZENS POINT OF VIEW AND THEIR PROPOSAL FROM A CASE-STUDY , 2013 .

[24]  Anders Lagerkvist,et al.  Methods for household waste composition studies. , 2008, Waste management.

[25]  R Woodard,et al.  Participation in curbside recycling schemes and its variation with material types. , 2006, Waste management.

[26]  Joanne Vining,et al.  What Makes a Recycler? , 1990 .

[27]  A. Lafuente,et al.  Urban Waste Recycling Behavior: Antecedents of Participation in a Selective Collection Program , 2002, Environmental management.

[28]  Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak,et al.  EFFECTS OF AN EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN ON PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR IN POLAND , 2006 .

[29]  Antonio Boccia,et al.  Impact on knowledge and behaviour of the general population of two different methods of solid waste management: An explorative cross-sectional study , 2014, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[30]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: Empirical evidence from Sweden ☆ , 2009 .