A Methodology for The Image of the City

In The Image of the City Lynch defined a concept of imageability or legibility of the physical form by the pattern or structure of the interrelations among five elements. The well-known elements are: paths, edges, districts, nodes, and landmarks. When considered in pairs (for example, paths — nodes, paths — districts) Lynch noted the elements could strengthen or weaken, ‘reinforce’, or ‘destroy’ each other. The seminal study method, however, deemphasized the interrelations of the elements, critical to the observation of how a ‘complex visual whole’ is organized. To surmount this limitation a method is presented which aids in the measurement of the interrelations of Lynch's elements. Formally, the pairwise comparisons of the (five) elements are performed by means of Saaty's square, a reciprocal matrix with unit rank whose eigenvector solution gives the priority or the relative importance, or dominance, of the elements on a ratio scale. The inputs to such a matrix are provided by means of a questionnaire which solicits each field surveyor's perception of the relative dominance of the elements within each pair by using a nine-point scale. The proposed protocol is applied to an analysis of the image of a university campus as seen in the field by a group of surveyors. The new approach retains the essentially qualitative conceptual property of Lynch's near-classic methodology while allowing for a statistical quantitative account of observer variation and group consensus of the image(s) of structure.

[1]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Modeling Directional Knowledge and Reasoning in Environmental Space: Testing Qualitative Metrics , 1996 .

[2]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  William C. Halperin,et al.  EXPLORING SPATIAL FAMILIARITY , 1990 .

[4]  T. McNamara,et al.  Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  R. Golledge,et al.  Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective , 1996 .

[6]  D. Appleyard Planning a Pluralist City: Conflicting Realities in Ciudad Guayana , 1976 .

[7]  T. McNamara Memory's view of space , 1991 .

[8]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[9]  T. McNamara Mental representations of spatial relations , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  N. Gale,et al.  Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition , 1987 .

[11]  K. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering The Image of the City , 1984 .

[12]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[13]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Place recognition and wayfinding: Making sense of space , 1992 .

[14]  Martin Cadwallader,et al.  Problems in Cognitive Distance , 1979 .

[15]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[16]  K. Lynch,et al.  Managing the sense of a region , 1976 .

[17]  D. Appleyard Styles and Methods of Structuring a City , 1970 .

[18]  T. Saaty Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[19]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[20]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.