Investigating high-school chemical kinetics: the Greek chemistry textbook and students' difficulties

In this study we present an analysis of how the structure and content of the Greek school textbook approach the concepts of chemical kinetics, and an investigation of the difficulties that 11th grade Greek students face regarding these concepts. Based on the structure and content of the Greek textbook, a tool was developed and applied to students in the form of test questions in order to investigate the difficulties that they encounter with concepts and facts of chemical kinetics. Our results indicate that the textbook presentation at several points does not take into consideration basic findings of chemistry education research, which could improve the understanding of the content, and that a large proportion of Greek students show low comprehension levels of the concepts and facts of chemical kinetics. Given the important role of the school textbook in the learning process, it seems that the structure and content of the textbook do not facilitate the conceptual understanding of the subject matter, and together with other factors contribute to the difficulties that students face regarding concepts in chemical kinetics.

[1]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding , 1993 .

[2]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[3]  Pinchas Tamir.  Multiple choice items: How to gain the most out of them , 1991 .

[4]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Towards a lakatosian analysis of the piagetian and alternative conceptions research programs , 1985 .

[5]  J. Peeck.  Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text , 1993 .

[6]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Towards a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science , 2008 .

[7]  Hans-Jürgen Schmidt,et al.  Textbooks’ and teachers’ understanding of acid-base models used in chemistry teaching , 2005 .

[8]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Translation of representations of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge , 1993 .

[9]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future , 1999 .

[10]  A. Haim.  Catalysis: New reaction pathways not just a lowering of the activation energy , 1989 .

[11]  Rosária Justi,et al.  A cause of ahistorical science teaching: Use of hybrid models , 1999 .

[12]  P. Taylor,et al.  Chemical Kinetics and Mechanism , 2002 .

[13]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Vive la Différence? Comparing “Like with Like” in Studies of Learners’ Ideas in Diverse Educational Contexts , 2012 .

[14]  S. Irez.  Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks , 2009 .

[15]  Patrick J. Garnett,et al.  Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium , 1985 .

[16]  Birgit Pepin,et al.  An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: who gets an opportunity to learn what? , 2002 .

[17]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  What have we learned about increasing the meaningfulness of science prose , 1983 .

[18]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[19]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Introduction: Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them: Key Models in Chemical Education , 2009 .

[20]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Prolegomenon to Scientific Visualizations , 2005 .

[21]  Rosária Justi,et al.  History and Philosophy of Science through Models: The Case of Chemical Kinetics , 1999 .

[22]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  BUILDING THE STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS OF CHEMISTRY: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FROM EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH , 2001 .

[23]  K. Taber.  Ethical considerations of chemistry education research involving ‘human subjects’ , 2014 .

[24]  Richard E. Mayer.  Instruction Based on Visualizations , 2010 .

[25]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades , 2008 .

[26]  Tina A. Grotzer,et al.  How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students' understanding? , 2003 .

[27]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[28]  Margareta Ekborg,et al.  Redox models in chemistry textbooks for the upper secondary school: friend or foe? , 2010 .

[29]  Joseph Nussbaum,et al.  Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross‐age study , 1981 .

[30]  J. Sullivan.  Mechanism of the ``Bimolecular'' Hydrogen—Iodine Reaction , 1967 .

[31]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Why Students May not Learn to Interpret Scientific Inscriptions , 2002 .

[32]  High School Chemistry Textbooks: Form and Function--A Symposium: What High School Chemistry Texts Do Well and What They Do Poorly. , 1983 .

[33]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Students' levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: A phenomenographic study , 2009 .

[34]  K. Laidler.  A glossary of terms used in chemical kinetics, including reaction dynamics (IUPAC Recommendations 1996) , 1996 .

[35]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Dimensions of Causal Understanding: the Role of Complex Causal Models in Students' Understanding of Science , 2005 .

[36]  Gultekin Cakmakci,et al.  Identifying Alternative Conceptions of Chemical Kinetics among Secondary School and Undergraduate Students in Turkey. , 2010 .

[37]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Correct Interpretation of Chemical Diagrams Requires Transforming from One Level of Representation to Another , 2008 .

[38]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Philosophy of Chemistry: An Emerging Field with Implications for Chemistry Education , 2001 .

[39]  Aija Ahtineva.  Textbook analysis in the service of chemistry teaching , 2005 .

[40]  Vasiliki Gkitzia,et al.  Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks , 2011 .

[41]  Anil C. Banerjee,et al.  Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. , 1991 .

[42]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids , 1991 .

[43]  Sanoe Chairam,et al.  Enhancing Thai students’ learning of chemical kinetics , 2009 .

[44]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  The role of intuitive heuristics in students' thinking: Ranking chemical substances , 2010 .

[45]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[46]  Alan K. Griffiths,et al.  Grade-12 Students' Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. , 1992 .

[47]  Iztok Devetak,et al.  The Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of the Science Textbooks , 2013 .

[48]  M. Arminda Pedrosa,et al.  Chemistry Textbook Approaches to Chemical Equilibrium and Student Alternative Conceptions , 2000 .

[49]  Tris Samberg,et al.  Student Study Guide to accompany Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change , 2002 .

[50]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  STUDENTS' ERRORS IN SOLVING NUMERICAL CHEMICAL-EQUILIBRIUM PROBLEMS , 2002 .

[51]  Nirit Glazer,et al.  Challenges with graph interpretation: a review of the literature , 2011 .

[52]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  QUANTUM-CHEMICAL CONCEPTS: ARE THEY SUITABLE FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS? , 2002 .

[53]  Gail Chittleborough,et al.  The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations , 2003 .

[54]  Gregory T. Rushton,et al.  Charting an Alternate Pathway to Reaction Orders and Rate Laws in Introductory Chemistry Courses , 2014 .

[55]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Teaching and Learning Chemical Kinetics , 2002 .

[56]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals , 1999 .

[57]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[58]  J. Leach,et al.  Students' Ideas about Reaction Rate and its Relationship with Concentration or Pressure , 2006 .

[59]  Images of physics: an explorative study of the changing character of visual images in Norwegian physics textbooks , 2012 .

[60]  Saouma BouJaoude.  Students' Systematic Errors When Solving Kinetic and Chemical Equilibrium Problems. , 1993 .

[61]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Is an atom of copper malleable , 1986 .

[62]  Pamela J. Garnett,et al.  Students' Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning , 1995 .

[63]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Common Characteristics of Models in Present-day Scientific Practice , 2007 .

[64]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning Science and the Science of Learning , 1988 .

[65]  Marcy H. Towns,et al.  A review of research on the teaching and learning of chemical kinetics , 2016 .

[66]  Mustafa Sözbilir,et al.  Prospective Chemistry Teachers' Conceptions of Chemical Thermodynamics and Kinetics , 2010 .

[67]  Tamás Turányi,et al.  Hungarian university students' misunderstandings in thermodynamics and chemical kinetics , 2013 .