In-store proximity marketing: experimenting with digital point-of-sales communication

Purpose The authors present an exploratory study on the effectiveness of in-store marketing communication appeals via digital signage applying the construal level theory (CLT) in a field experiment. According to this theory, the authors hypothesize that shoppers will on the one hand respond more favorably to messages focusing on the desirability of the offering, when they are further distanced from the actual purchase decision. On the other hand, the authors expect more favorable responses toward messages containing feasibility appeals, positioned closer by to the purchase decision. The purpose of this paper is to determine appropriate location-based content for in-store proximity marketing. Design/methodology/approach A field experiment was conducted in a Belgian coffee bar, examining temporal distance effects in a natural retail/service environment. A 2×2 between-subjects experimental design is implemented (i.e. low vs high temporal distance×concrete/cost vs abstract/brand-oriented appeal), examining the impact on marketing communication effectiveness. Findings Overall, the authors find some initial support for CLT on effectiveness measures regarding purchase intentions and actual purchase, but not in terms of self-reported noticing of the screen and the ad, nor in terms of (un)aided ad recall. Research limitations/implications This experiment is a pilot study and such finds itself confronted with a limited number of observations. Originality/value The study is among the first to examine how message content (beyond price promotion) can be adapted to in-store locations.

[1]  John V. Harrison,et al.  A virtual marketplace for advertising narrowcast over digital signage networks , 2004, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[2]  Charles Dennis,et al.  The mediating effects of perception and emotion: Digital signage in mall atmospherics. , 2010 .

[3]  Charles Dennis,et al.  Shoppers' Experiences of Digital Signage-a Cross-National Qualitative Study , 2010, J. Digit. Content Technol. its Appl..

[4]  J. Hagberg,et al.  The digitalization of retailing: an exploratory framework , 2016 .

[5]  Marjorie J. Cooper,et al.  Tying the pieces together: A normative framework for integrating sales and project operations , 2007 .

[6]  Eleftherios Alamanos,et al.  New insights into the impact of digital signage as a retail atmospheric tool , 2012 .

[7]  R. Dhar,et al.  Seeing the Forest or the Trees: Implications of Construal Level Theory for Consumer Choice , 2007 .

[8]  Seung-Chul Yoo,et al.  提携研究機関誌からの論文紹介 The Advertising Research Foundation 『Journal of Advertising Research』より In-store video advertising effectiveness: three new studies provide in-market field data , 2010 .

[9]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[10]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[11]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  The personalization-privacy paradox: implications for new media , 2016 .

[12]  Jing Wang,et al.  Psychological distance asymmetry: The spatial dimension vs. other dimensions , 2009 .

[13]  Eleftherios Alamanos,et al.  The effect of digital signage on shoppers' behavior: The role of the evoked experience , 2014 .

[14]  R. Rizley,et al.  Innovations in Shopper Marketing: Current Insights and Future Research Issues , 2011 .

[15]  Jens Nordfält,et al.  Do Digital Displays Enhance Sales? Role of Retail Format and Message Content , 2016 .

[16]  Raymond R. Burke Behavioral Effects of Digital Signage , 2009, Journal of Advertising Research.

[17]  S. Barnes,et al.  Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: a theoretical framework and empirical study , 2005 .

[18]  Arjun Chaudhuri,et al.  The moderating roles of shopper experience and store type on the relationship between perceived merchandise value and willingness to pay a higher price , 2012 .

[19]  H. Timmermans,et al.  What is smart for retailing , 2014 .

[20]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Display Blindness: The Effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage , 2009, Pervasive.

[21]  A. Agresti [A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables]: Rejoinder , 1992 .

[22]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Display Blindness?: Looking Again at the Visibility of Situated Displays using Eye-tracking , 2015, CHI.

[23]  Wojciech Piotrowicz,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue Information Technology in Retail: Toward Omnichannel Retailing , 2014, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[24]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Comparative and Noncomparative Advertising: Attitudinal Effects under Cognitive and Affective Involvement Conditions , 1994 .

[25]  Charles Dennis,et al.  Marketing images and consumers' experiences in selling environments , 2006 .