Evaluation of ecosystem responses to land-use change using soil quality and primary productivity in a semi-arid area, Israel

a b s t r a c t Land-use change (LUC) from natural to human-dominated land is a critical aspect of global change and ecosystem response. To improve our understanding of LUC, this study focused on: (1) developing a general theoretical framework for quantifying and evaluating the attributes of ecosystem response as a conse- quence of LUC; and (2) testing the validity of this framework using recent LUC in the desert fringe of the northern Negev Desert. Our framework is based on the premise that changes in soil and vegetation states are the most important and universal facets of ecosystems' response to LUC. The framework depicts LUC as trajectories of indicators that signify soil and vegetation states, such as the soil quality index (SQI) and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), respectively, in a phase plane. The trajectories are char- acterized by both magnitude and the direction of the change that enable us to address and compare the general trends of the LUC. Our study explored the validity of the proposed framework for the following LUC cases: (1) grazing to natural ecosystem; (2) natural to grazing ecosystem; (3) rain-fed agricultural to natural ecosystem; and (4) rain-fed agricultural to grazing ecosystem. The SQI was quantified by 14 phys- ical, biological, and chemical attributes that were merged into one index, while the ANPP was derived from biomass sampling. All transitions show strong relationships between SQI and ANPP (0.70 < R2 < 0.85; p < 0.05). Transitions from grazing to natural ecosystems are characterized by an increase in both SQI and ANPP variables; while all transitions that change from agricultural systems to less intensively managed systems, such as grazing or a natural system, show no change or a decrease in both SQI and ANPP. We infer that all the trajectories' trends are a result of changes in the biodiversity dimensions during LUC. Analysis of the results revealed four properties of a theoretical framework that can be used for the developing science of LUC and ecosystem responses. Our framework enables: (1) a comparison between different types of LUC; (2) a study of transitions among self-organized and managed ecosystems; (3) the identi- fication of short- and long-term effects; and (4) the integration of biodiversity and ecosystem function. We suggest that the four properties of the framework can provide the foundation for the development of an LUC science. However, the validity and the generality of the framework should be tested over a wide range of LUCs of terrestrial systems in the world. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. Mausbach,et al.  Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial) , 1997 .

[2]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[3]  W. Dean Hively,et al.  Strategies for Soil Quality Assessment Using Visible and Near‐Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy in a Western Kenya Chronosequence , 2012 .

[4]  William K. Lauenroth,et al.  REGIONAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION IN NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN GRASSLANDS , 1997 .

[5]  P. Groffman,et al.  Nitrogen fixation in macro- and microphytic patches in the Negev desert , 1998 .

[6]  Steven D. Warren,et al.  Soil Response to Trampling Under Intensive Rotation Grazing1 , 1986 .

[7]  Moshe Shachak,et al.  Ecosystem Management of Desertified Shrublands in Israel , 1998, Ecosystems.

[8]  S. S. Andrews,et al.  A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California , 2002 .

[9]  M. R. Carter,et al.  Soil Quality for Sustainable Land Management: Organic Matter and Aggregation Interactions that Maintain Soil Functions , 2002 .

[10]  Michael B. Coughenour,et al.  Invited Synthesis Paper: Spatial Components of Plant-Herbivore Interactions in Pastoral, Ranching, and Native Ungulate Ecosystems , 1991 .

[11]  Moshe Shachak,et al.  Linking Community and Ecosystem Processes: The Role of Minor Species , 2006, Ecosystems.

[12]  A. Gibon,et al.  Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response , 2000 .

[13]  Jacqueline de Chazal,et al.  Land-use and climate change within assessments of biodiversity change: A review , 2009 .

[14]  P. Crutzen,et al.  The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature , 2007, Ambio.

[15]  W. Parton,et al.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. , 1997, Science.

[16]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Analyzing the global human appropriation of net primary production — processes, trajectories, implications. An introduction☆ , 2009 .

[17]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[18]  Douglas L. Karlen,et al.  The Soil Management Assessment Framework , 2004 .

[19]  Arnon Karnieli,et al.  Decision support system for improving wheat grain quality in the Mediterranean area of Israel , 2004 .

[20]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[21]  Beth K. Gugino,et al.  Farmer-oriented assessment of soil quality using field, laboratory, and VNIR spectroscopy methods , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[22]  A. Magurran,et al.  Biological diversity : the coexistence of species on changing landscapes , 1994 .

[23]  B. McKenzie,et al.  Grazing effects on soil physical properties and the consequences for pastures: a review , 2001 .

[24]  D. Karlen,et al.  Soil quality: Current concepts and applications , 2001 .

[25]  Steven M. De Jong,et al.  Estimating spatial patterns of rainfall interception from remotely sensed vegetation indices and spectral mixture analysis , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  G. Daily,et al.  Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[28]  A. Mazumder,et al.  REVERSAL OF GRAZING IMPACT ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN NUTRIENT‐POOR VS. NUTRIENT‐RICH ECOSYSTEMS , 1998 .

[29]  Jeffrey A. Cardille,et al.  From the redwood forest to the Gulf Stream waters: human signature nearly ubiquitous in representative US landscapes , 2010 .

[30]  F. Bastida,et al.  Past, present and future of soil quality indices : A biological perspective , 2008 .

[31]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[32]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production , 2007 .

[33]  E. Zaady,et al.  Infiltration through three contrasting biological soil crusts in patterned landscapes in the Negev, Israel , 2000 .

[34]  Y. Osem,et al.  Similarity between seed bank and vegetation in a semi-arid annual plant community : The role of productivity and grazing , 2006 .

[35]  Jeffrey E. Herrick,et al.  Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management? , 2000 .

[36]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[37]  E. Zaady,et al.  The Effects of Grazing on Abiotic and Biotic Parameters in a Semiarid Ecosystem: A Case Study from the Northern Negev Desert, Israel , 2001 .

[38]  J. Ares,et al.  Effect of grazing on plant patterns in arid ecosystems of Patagonian Monte , 2005 .

[39]  G. Daily,et al.  ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems , 2007 .

[40]  G. Han,et al.  Grazing intensity affected spatial patterns of vegetation and soil fertility in a desert steppe , 2010 .

[41]  W. Dean,et al.  Historical changes in stocking rates of domestic livestock as a measure of semi-arid and arid rangeland degradation in the Cape Province, South Africa , 1994 .

[42]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[43]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[44]  Untangling the positive and negative effects of shrubs on herbaceous vegetation in drylands , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  Compton J. Tucker,et al.  A critical review of remote sensing and other methods for non-destructive estimation of standing crop biomass , 1980 .

[46]  K. Gaston Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[47]  O. J. Idowu,et al.  Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts , 2009, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[48]  A. Huete,et al.  A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index , 1994 .

[49]  James J. Kay,et al.  An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity , 1999 .

[50]  N. Seligman,et al.  Management of Semi-Arid Ecosystems in Israel , 1979 .

[51]  J. Hill,et al.  Using Imaging Spectroscopy to study soil properties , 2009 .

[52]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  Tropical deforestation and atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1991 .

[53]  Yagil Osem,et al.  Grazing effect on diversity of annual plant communities in a semi‐arid rangeland: interactions with small‐scale spatial and temporal variation in primary productivity , 2002 .

[54]  P. K. Chhonkar,et al.  Soil quality indices for evaluation of long‐term land use and soil management practices in semi‐arid sub‐tropical India , 2008 .

[55]  S. Prober,et al.  Biodiversity and agriculture: Production frontiers as a framework for exploring trade-offs and evaluating policy , 2012 .

[56]  S. Levin Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems , 1998, Ecosystems.

[57]  Moshe Shachak,et al.  17 - Livestock and Engineering Network in the Israeli Negev: Implications for Ecosystem Management , 2007 .

[58]  M. Arshad,et al.  Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems , 2002 .

[59]  I. Backéus Comments on Conservation, reclamation and grazing in the northern Negev: contradictory or complementary concepts? (paper 38a) by Avi Perevolotsky , 1995 .

[60]  D. Karlen,et al.  Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators : I. Central and Southern High Plains , 2000 .

[61]  A. Huete A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[62]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology , 2000, Oecologia.

[63]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  A remote sensing based vegetation classification logic for global land cover analysis , 1995 .

[64]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[65]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  HUMAN APPROPRIATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[66]  P. Munguia,et al.  Measuring ecosystem function: consequences arising from variation in biomass-productivity relationships , 2008 .

[67]  Douglas L. Karlen,et al.  Soil quality: why and how? , 2003 .

[68]  C. Fabricius,et al.  Comparing biodiversity between protected areas and adjacent rangeland in xeric succulent thicket, South Africa: arthropods and reptiles , 2003 .

[69]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  GRAZING SYSTEMS, ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES, AND GLOBAL CHANGE , 2004 .

[70]  John P. Reganold,et al.  Systematic method for rating soil quality of conventional, organic, and integrated apple orchards in Washington State , 2000 .

[71]  O. Sun,et al.  Land use affects the relationship between species diversity and productivity at the local scale in a semi‐arid steppe ecosystem , 2006, Functional ecology.

[72]  R. H. Hart,et al.  Rangeland soil carbon and nitrogen responses to grazing , 1995 .

[73]  Y. Osem,et al.  Site productivity and plant size explain the response of annual species to grazing exclusion in a Mediterranean semi‐arid rangeland , 2004 .

[74]  Jay T. Lennon,et al.  Biodiversity may regulate the temporal variability of ecological systems , 2001 .

[75]  H. Lambers,et al.  Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  G. Lovett,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION TO A DESERT ECOSYSTEM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT , 1998 .

[77]  D. M. Newbery,et al.  M. A. Huston, Biological Diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36930-4 (pbk). 681 + xix. pages. £24.95. , 1995, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[78]  R. Robinson Rings of flowers , 1986 .

[79]  K. K. Goldewijk Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE Database , 2001 .

[80]  T. Fleischner,et al.  Ecological Costs of Livestock Grazing in Western North America , 1994 .

[81]  A. Danin,et al.  The distribution of Raunkiaer life forms in Israel in relation to the environment , 1990 .

[82]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[83]  H. Es,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management , 2008 .

[84]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? , 2005 .

[85]  Mushtaque Ahmed,et al.  Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity , 1991 .

[86]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Primary production: The biosphere and man , 1973 .

[87]  G. P. Robertson,et al.  Water and energy footprints of bioenergy crop production on marginal lands , 2011 .

[88]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[89]  Marion Potschin,et al.  Land use and the state of the natural environment , 2009 .

[90]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits , 2007 .

[91]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  Landscape Ecology: Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems , 1995, Science.

[92]  P. K. Chhonkar,et al.  Soil quality response to long-term nutrient and crop management on a semi-arid Inceptisol , 2007 .

[93]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Recovery of forest plant communities in post‐agricultural landscapes , 2005 .

[94]  H. Olff,et al.  Multiscale soil and vegetation patchiness along a gradient of herbivore impact in a semi-arid grazing system in West Africa , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[95]  M. Shachak,et al.  Fine-Scale Spatial Heterogeneity of Resource Modulation in Semi-Arid “Islands of Fertility” , 2012 .

[96]  Xuewen Huang,et al.  Plant Species Richness and Ecosystem Multifunctionality in Global Drylands , 2012, Science.

[97]  Jeremy D. Maestas,et al.  Biodiversity across a Rural Land‐Use Gradient , 2003 .

[98]  A. Izac,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: Are we asking the right questions? , 2004 .

[99]  M. Rietkerk,et al.  Self-Organized Patchiness and Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems , 2004, Science.

[100]  A. Goudie The Human Impact on the Natural Environment: Past, Present, and Future , 2005 .

[101]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[102]  F. J. Stevenson Nitrogen - organic forms. , 2015 .

[103]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .