Intrinsic disorder in proteins: a challenge for (un)structural biology met by ion mobility-mass spectrometry.

The link between structure and function of a given protein is a principal tenet of biology. The established approach to understand the function of a protein is to 'solve' its structure and subsequently investigate interactions between the protein and its binding partners. However, structure determination via crystallography or NMR is challenging for proteins where localized regions or even their entire structure fail to fold into a three-dimensional form. These so called IDPs (intrinsically disordered proteins) or intrinsically disordered regions constitute up to 40% of all expressed proteins, and a much higher percentage in proteins involved in the proliferation of cancer. For these proteins, there is a need to develop new methods for structural characterization which exploit their biophysical properties. IM (ion mobility)-MS is uniquely able to examine both absolute conformation(s), populations of conformation and also conformational change, and is therefore highly applicable to the study of IDPs. The present article details the technique of IM-MS and illustrates its use in assessing the relative disorder of the wild-type p53 DNA-core-binding domain of cellular tumour antigen p53. The IM data were acquired on a Waters Synapt HDMS instrument following nESI (nanoelectrospray ionization) from 'native' and low-pH solution conditions.

[1]  C. Robinson,et al.  Methodology for measuring conformation of solvent-disrupted protein subunits using T-WAVE ion mobility MS: An investigation into eukaryotic initiation factors , 2009, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[2]  Utilising ion mobility-mass spectrometry to interrogate macromolecules: Factor H complement control protein modules 10-15 and 19-20 and the DNA-binding core domain of tumour suppressor p53 , 2010 .

[3]  George C. Schatz,et al.  Structural Information from Ion Mobility Measurements: Effects of the Long-Range Potential , 1996 .

[4]  D. J. Douglas,et al.  Unfolding of proteins monitored by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: a comparison of positive and negative ion modes , 1998, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[5]  C. Robinson,et al.  Evidence for Macromolecular Protein Rings in the Absence of Bulk Water , 2005, Science.

[6]  George C. Schatz,et al.  Mobilities of carbon cluster ions: Critical importance of the molecular attractive potential , 1998 .

[7]  Jennifer C. Lee,et al.  α-Synuclein: Stable compact and extended monomeric structures and pH dependence of dimer formation , 2004, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[8]  Ewa Jurneczko,et al.  How useful is ion mobility mass spectrometry for structural biology? The relationship between protein crystal structures and their collision cross sections in the gas phase. , 2011, The Analyst.

[9]  R. Bateman,et al.  Applications of a travelling wave-based radio-frequency-only stacked ring ion guide. , 2004, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[10]  C. Robinson,et al.  Collision cross sections of proteins and their complexes: a calibration framework and database for gas-phase structural biology. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Ion mobility mass spectrometry of proteins and protein assemblies. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[12]  Jérôme Lemoine,et al.  Folding of a salivary intrinsically disordered protein upon binding to tannins. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Pendular proteins in gases and new avenues for characterization of macromolecules by ion mobility spectrometry , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Bennett.  The role of α-synuclein in neurodegenerative diseases , 2005 .

[15]  N. Oldham,et al.  Collision induced unfolding of protein ions in the gas phase studied by ion mobility-mass spectrometry: The effect of ligand binding on conformational stability , 2009, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[16]  V. Uversky,et al.  Characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: Conformational heterogeneity of α‐synuclein , 2009, Proteins.

[17]  Roger Guevremont,et al.  High-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry: a new tool for mass spectrometry. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[18]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Multiparametric analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins: looking at intrinsic disorder through compound eyes. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Two-dimensional gas-phase separations coupled to mass spectrometry for analysis of complex mixtures. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  Brian C. Bohrer,et al.  Biomolecule analysis by ion mobility spectrometry. , 2008, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[21]  A. Shvartsburg,et al.  An exact hard-spheres scattering model for the mobilities of polyatomic ions , 1996 .

[22]  S. Radford,et al.  Elongated oligomers in β2-microglobulin amyloid assembly revealed by ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  N. Reich,et al.  Specific interaction of the SV40 T antigen-cellular p53 protein complex with SV40 DNA. , 1982, Virology.

[24]  Brandon T Ruotolo,et al.  Ion mobility–mass spectrometry analysis of large protein complexes , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[25]  H. Cooper,et al.  High-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) coupled with high-resolution electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry for the analysis of isobaric phosphopeptides. , 2009, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[26]  I. Kaltashov,et al.  Highly asymmetric interactions between globin chains during hemoglobin assembly revealed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[27]  C. Harris,et al.  The IARC TP53 database: New online mutation analysis and recommendations to users , 2002, Human mutation.

[28]  G. Manfioletti,et al.  Conformational role for the C-terminal tail of the intrinsically disordered high mobility group A (HMGA) chromatin factors. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[29]  A. Fersht,et al.  Stabilising the DNA-binding domain of p53 by rational design of its hydrophobic core , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[30]  E. G. Nazarov,et al.  A new method of separation of multi-atomic ions by mobility at atmospheric pressure using a high-frequency amplitude-asymmetric strong electric field , 1993 .

[31]  A. Fersht,et al.  Mechanism of rescue of common p53 cancer mutations by second‐site suppressor mutations , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[32]  F. Fraternali,et al.  The p73 DNA binding domain displays enhanced stability relative to its homologue, the tumor suppressor p53, and exhibits cooperative DNA binding. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[33]  C. Delphin,et al.  Characterization of baculovirus recombinant wild-type p53 , 1994 .