Potential role of intensity modulated proton beams in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE The present study was undertaken to assess the potential benefit of intensity modulated (IM) proton beams in optimizing the dose distribution to safely escalate the tumor dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Four treatment plans were compared in a prostate cancer patient aiming to deliver 81 Gy to the target: 1) conformal 18 MV X-rays, 6-fields; 2) 214 MeV protons, 2-fields; 3) IM 15 MV X-rays, 5-fields; and 4) 177-200 Mev IM protons, 5-fields as in Plan 3. In addition, IM methods were used to further escalate the tumor dose to 99 Gy. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to physically compare the treatment plans. DVH data were also used to obtain normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for the rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and tumor control probabilities. RESULTS Although the planning target volume dose distribution was satisfactory with the four treatment plans, the homogeneity was slightly reduced in both X-ray plans (IM and standard) and the low-to-medium doses delivered to all organs at risk, and other normal tissues were significantly reduced by both proton plans. For a prescribed dose of 81 Gy, only the IM X-ray and IM proton plans both succeeded in predicting an acceptably low NTCP for the rectum (<5%, Grade 3). The integral nontarget dose was significantly reduced with IM proton beams (i.e., 3.1, 1.3, and 1.7 times less than Plans 1, 2, and 3, respectively). When escalating the dose to 99 Gy, no additional improvement between IM protons and IM X-ray beams was observed. CONCLUSION Both IM X-ray and proton beams were able to optimize the dose distribution and comply with the goal of delivering the highest dose to the target while reducing the risk of severe morbidity to acceptable levels. The main advantage compared to IM X-rays was that IM protons succeeded in significantly reducing the low-to-medium dose to the nontarget tissues and achieved a small improvement in planning target volume (PTV) dose heterogeneity.

[1]  C. Ling,et al.  Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  H. Sandler,et al.  Potential improvement in the results of irradiation for prostate carcinoma using improved dose distribution. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  R Mohan,et al.  A feasibility study of automated inverse treatment planning for cancer of the prostate. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Reinhard W. Schulte,et al.  Conformal proton therapy for prostate carcinoma. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Correlation of pretherapy prostate cancer characteristics with seminal vesicle invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  A. Neugut,et al.  Bladder carcinoma and other second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma , 1997, Cancer.

[7]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  A. Zietman,et al.  Radical radiation therapy in the management of prostatic adenocarcinoma: the initial prostate specific antigen value as a predictor of treatment outcome. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[9]  A. Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  A. Patchefsky,et al.  Perineural invasion and Gleason 7-10 tumors predict increased failure in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml treated with conformal external beam radiation therapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  E. Crawford,et al.  Advanced prostate cancer , 1999, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[12]  R Miralbell,et al.  Reproducibility of conformal radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of the prostate without rigid immobilization. , 1996, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Wolfgang Schlegel,et al.  Three-Dimensional Solution of the Inverse Problem in Conformation Radiotherapy , 1992 .

[14]  L. Verhey,et al.  Proton beam therapy. , 1982, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[15]  B. Carey,et al.  Quantitative Imaging in Oncology , 1996 .

[16]  J. Lyman Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms , 1985 .

[17]  M Goitein,et al.  Late rectal bleeding following combined X-ray and proton high dose irradiation for patients with stages T3-T4 prostate carcinoma. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  G E Hanks,et al.  The effect of dose on local control of prostate cancer. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  R. Mohan,et al.  Histogram reduction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  R. Miralbell,et al.  Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine? , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[22]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of radiation therapy , 1994 .

[23]  G J Kutcher,et al.  The effect of treatment positioning on normal tissue dose in patients with prostate cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  M. Anscher,et al.  Radiotherapy for prostate cancer: should the seminal vesicles be considered target? , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  L. Verhey,et al.  Advanced prostate cancer: the results of a randomized comparative trial of high dose irradiation boosting with conformal protons compared with conventional dose irradiation using photons alone. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  A Lomax,et al.  The exchange of radiotherapy data as part of an electronic patient-referral system. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  William R. Fair,et al.  DOSE ESCALATION WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY AFFECTS THE OUTCOME IN PROSTATE CANCER , 1998 .

[28]  A. V. von Eschenbach,et al.  Prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma , 1997, Cancer.