Stress measurements at depth in the vicinity of the San Andreas Fault: Implications for the magnitude of shear stress at depth

Using the hydraulic fracturing technique, we have made a systematic series of in situ stress measurements in wells drilled near the San Andreas fault. In an attempt to provide constraints for the magnitude of shear stress on the San Andreas fault at depth we have measured both the variation of stress with distance from the fault in relatively shallow (∼230 m) wells and the variation of stress with depth in a ∼1-km-deep well located 4 km from the fault. The shallow wells are located along profiles roughly perpendicular to the fault in the western Mojave desert near Palmdale and in central California where the fault is creeping. In both areas the direction of maximum compression was found to be approximately 45° from the local trend of the San Andreas. The two stress profiles show very similar results: (1) shear stress (on planes parallel to the San Andreas) increases with distance from the fault, more markedly in the western Mojave, (2) the far-field shear stress at ∼200 m depth is ∼50 bars, and (3) the horizontal principal stresses as well as shear stress increase with depth more rapidly in the wells farthest from the fault. The ∼1-km-deep well, also located in the western Mojave desert, shows increases of both horizontal principal stresses and shear stress with depth. Shear stress increases from about 25 bars at 150–300 m to about 80 bars at 750–850 m. Although this rapid increase of shear stress with depth suggests that the mean shear stress on the fault at seismogenic depths exceeds several hundred bars, the principal stresses increase with depth in a steplike manner. As this may be a near-surface effect, extrapolation of the measurements to much greater depths may not be warranted.

[1]  M. Zoback,et al.  Magnitude of Shear Stress on the San Andreas Fault: Implications of a Stress Measurement Profile at Shallow Depth , 1979, Science.

[2]  M. Zoback,et al.  Preliminary stress measurements in central California using the hydraulic fracturing technique , 1977 .

[3]  A. Lachenbruch,et al.  Corrections to ‘Heat flow and energetics of the San Andreas Fault Zone’ and some additional comments on the relation between fault friction and observed heat flow , 1981 .

[4]  A. McGarr,et al.  State of Stress in the Earth's Crust , 1978 .

[5]  A. McGarr Some constraints on levels of shear stress in the crust from observations and theory , 1980 .

[6]  M. King Hubbert,et al.  Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing , 1972 .

[7]  J. Zemanek,et al.  Formation evaluation by inspection with the borehole televiewer , 1970 .

[8]  Bezalel C. Haimson,et al.  Near-surface and deep hydrofracturing stress measurements in the Waterloo quartzite , 1980 .

[9]  M. L. Sbar,et al.  Stress pattern near the San Andreas Fault, Palmdale, California, from near‐surface in situ measurements , 1979 .

[10]  W. S. Keys,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing to determine the regional in situ stress field, Piceance Basin, Colorado , 1976 .

[11]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  State of stress in the conterminous United States , 1980 .

[12]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  Hydraulic Fracture Propagation And The Interpretation Of Pressure-Time Records For In-Situ Stress Determinations , 1978 .

[13]  E. J. Stahl,et al.  A Study of Induced Fracturing Using an Instrumental Approach , 1967 .