Quantifying the influence of static-like errors in least-squares-based inversion and sequential simulation of cross-borehole ground penetrating radar data.

Unknown borehole irregularities and small-scale velocity fluctuations near transmitter and receiver antennae positions may cause relatively strong travel time effects on cross-borehole ground penetrating radar (GPR) data. Previous studies have demonstrated that such effects may severely contaminate cross-borehole GPR tomographic images of radar wave velocity if they are not properly accounted for prior to, or during, inversion. In this paper we calculate the travel time effect of cavities in the borehole walls and small-scale velocity anomalies near the antennae positions using a full waveform modeling algorithm. We define covariance matrices for static-like errors which approximately capture the overall correlation properties of these effects. In synthetic tests, we investigate to which extent the resolution of least-squares-based tomographic inversion is affected by the calculated error types under different assumptions made about the statistical properties of the data errors. We find that the effects of the correlated data errors may be significantly suppressed if static-like errors are accounted for during inversion, even though the errors are not strictly static. Furthermore, we demonstrate that when static-like errors are accounted for, model resolution does not decline significantly, even when the expectation to the standard deviation of the data errors is increased above the level of the correlated errors. We implement this approach of accounting for correlated data errors in a sequential simulation algorithm, which we use to solve the inverse tomographic problem in order to obtain multiple realizations of the fine-scale GPR velocity distribution between the boreholes. Synthetic tests show that the assumptions made about the error correlation properties are significant for obtaining reliable images of the fine-scaled velocity distribution between the boreholes, even in cases where the correct prior knowledge about model correlation properties are available. We observe that the static-like data errors may introduce artifacts in the velocity distributions near the borehole walls if they are not properly accounted for during the conditioned simulation process. We apply the sequential simulation algorithm to a real data set from Arrenaes, Denmark and demonstrate that accounting for correlated data errors has a significant effect on the interpretation of the field data. In comparison to the standard approach in which errors are considered to be uncorrelated, higher resolution images with stronger contrasts between high- and low-velocity anomalies are produced when correlation of the data errors are accounted for.

[1]  M. Chouteau,et al.  Massive sulphide delineation using borehole radar: tests at the McConnell nickel deposit, Sudbury, Ontario , 2001 .

[2]  A. Tarantola Inverse problem theory : methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation , 1987 .

[3]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations , 2005 .

[4]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[5]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  Resolution and error propagation analysis for tomographic data with correlated errors , 1996 .

[6]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[7]  Jacques R. Ernst,et al.  Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data , 2007 .

[8]  J. J. Peterson Pre-inversion Corrections and Analysis of Radar Tomographic Data , 2001 .

[9]  Jeffrey W. Roberts,et al.  Estimation of permeable pathways and water content using tomographic radar data , 1997 .

[10]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems , 1995 .

[11]  G. Nolet,et al.  Seismic wave propagation and seismic tomography , 1987 .

[12]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Linear inverse Gaussian theory and geostatistics , 2006 .

[13]  Knud Skou Cordua,et al.  Accounting for Correlated Data Errors during Inversion of Cross‐Borehole Ground Penetrating Radar Data , 2008 .

[14]  Thomas Mejer Hansen,et al.  Inferring the Subsurface Structural Covariance Model Using Cross‐Borehole Ground Penetrating Radar Tomography , 2008 .

[15]  Jacques R. Ernst,et al.  Full-Waveform Inversion of Crosshole Radar Data Based on 2-D Finite-Difference Time-Domain Solutions of Maxwell's Equations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Binzhong Zhou,et al.  Delineation of sulphide ore-zones by borehole radar tomography at Hellyer Mine, Australia , 2001 .

[17]  Colin A. Zelt,et al.  Three‐dimensional seismic refraction tomography: A comparison of two methods applied to data from the Faeroe Basin , 1998 .

[18]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Monitoring Unsaturated Flow and Transport Using Cross‐Borehole Geophysical Methods , 2008 .

[19]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Generalized Nonlinear Inverse Problems Solved Using the Least Squares Criterion (Paper 1R1855) , 1982 .

[20]  K. Holliger,et al.  Numerical modeling of borehole georadar data , 2002 .

[21]  Andrew T. Walden,et al.  An investigation of the spectral properties of primary reflection coefficients , 1985 .

[22]  A. Binley,et al.  Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross‐hole electrical resistance and ground‐penetrating radar traveltime data , 2006 .

[23]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[24]  D. Gomez,et al.  Flow and transport in the unsaturated Sherwood Sandstone: characterization using cross-borehole geophysical methods , 2006, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[25]  Thomas Mejer Hansen,et al.  VISIM: Sequential simulation for linear inverse problems , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[26]  A. Green,et al.  Potential coordinate mislocations in crosshole tomography: Results from the Grimsel test site, Switzerland , 1997 .

[27]  D. Wiltschko,et al.  Ramp initiation and spacing in a homogeneous thrust wedge , 2007 .

[28]  H. Maurer,et al.  Stochastic regularization: Smoothness or similarity? , 1998 .

[29]  James Irving,et al.  Numerical modeling of ground-penetrating radar in 2-D using MATLAB , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[30]  M. Eppstein,et al.  Efficient three‐dimensional data inversion: Soil characterization and moisture Monitoring from cross‐well ground‐penetrating radar at a Vermont Test Site , 1998 .

[31]  Don W. Vasco,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar velocity tomography in heterogeneous and anisotropic media , 1997 .

[32]  Andrew Binley,et al.  High‐resolution characterization of vadose zone dynamics using cross‐borehole radar , 2001 .

[33]  Barry J. Allred,et al.  Hydrogeophysical Case Studies in the Vadose Zone , 2005 .

[34]  H. Maurer,et al.  Effects of stochastic heterogeneity on ray-based tomographic inversion of crosshole georadar amplitude data , 2004 .