Voluntary Agreements and the Environmental Efficiency of Participating Farms

Voluntary environmental agreements have been popular with government agencies in several countries. However, many questions remain about their efficiency as a regulatory tool. Recent analyses suggest that they are more effective than classical regulatory or economic approaches when dealing with nonpoint pollution and when innovation processes at the source are necessary to define effective regulation. This paper applies an activitybased framework to assess the contribution of voluntary agreements to the environmental performance of farms participating voluntarily in a whole farm plan in the Southern part of Belgium. Using a cross-section of 52 farms, our results show that farms entering into environmental agreements are environmentally more efficient than non-participating farms when non-desirable outputs and the conservation of landscape features is accounted for in the analysis.

[1]  Wildlife Habitats.  Environmental Indicators for Agriculture Methods and Results , 2000 .

[2]  D. Ervin,et al.  What it takes to "Get to Yes" for Whole Farm Planning Policy , 1996 .

[3]  Carlo Carraro,et al.  Voluntary approaches in environmental policy , 1999 .

[4]  B. Golany,et al.  Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Agapi Somwaru,et al.  Incorporating indesirable outputs into models of production: an application to US agriculture , 1994 .

[6]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Non-mandatory Approaches to Environmental Protection , 2002 .

[7]  K. Hadri,et al.  Efficiency, Environmental Contaminants and Farm Size: Testing for Links Using Stochastic Production Frontiers , 1999 .

[8]  J. Shogren,et al.  Theory, Modeling and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution , 1993 .

[9]  R. Färe,et al.  An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities , 1996 .

[10]  Bruce A. Babcock,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of Voluntary vs. Mandatory Environmental Regulations , 1999 .

[11]  Anna Alberini,et al.  The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: which firms participate and why? , 2000 .

[12]  Keith O. Fuglie,et al.  Adoption and Diffusion of Natural-Resource-Conserving Agricultural Technology , 2001 .

[13]  J. Stranlund.  Public Mechanisms to Support Compliance to an Environmental Norm , 1995 .

[14]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[15]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environmental Protection? , 1998 .

[16]  N. Hanley,et al.  Assessing the success of agri-environmental policy in the UK , 1999 .

[17]  E. Lichtenberg,et al.  Subsidizing Agricultural Nonpoint-Source Pollution Control: Targeting Cost Sharing and Technical Assistance , 1993 .

[18]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms—Concepts and Empirical Results , 1997 .

[19]  Franck Aggeri,et al.  Environmental policies and innovation: A knowledge-based perspective on cooperative approaches , 1999 .

[20]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  Countryside stewardship : farmers, policies, and markets , 1999 .

[21]  P. Mineau,et al.  The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity , 1995 .