Applied Technology in Business Program--An Industry-Academia Partnership to Support Student Learning

The need to integrate theory and practice in education is critical for applied disciplines such as business and engineering. Although internship and coop programs attempt to bridge the gap between conceptual and applied knowledge, they suffer from some limitations. In the field of information systems in particular, employers are seeking students who can successfully work at the confluence of business and technology. This paper describes a new model and program for applied undergraduate education that develops business technologists. The program uses projects as a key linking mechanism for helping students understand how to apply technology to solve business problems, and to be able to do them relatively independently over time. To gain insights into the success of the program, a model linking various salient antecedents to project outcomes is developed. A test of the model reveals that while the quantitative evidence is not conclusive, it does indicate that the program is achieving its objectives. Additional qualitative data on program outcomes is presented.

[1]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Software Processes and Project Performance , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Sarma R. Nidumolu The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  Seeding the Line: Understanding the Transition From IT to Non-IT Careers , 1999, MIS Q..

[4]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Improving Software Productivity , 1987, Computer.

[6]  Vijay S. Mookerjee,et al.  Modeling Coordination in Software Construction: An Analytical Approach , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  L. B.S. Raccoon A learning curve primer for software engineers , 1996, SOEN.

[8]  T. Guimaraes The importance of practical theory , 1999 .

[9]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[10]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Perceptions of Conflict and Success in Information Systems Development Projects , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[13]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering , 1987 .

[14]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Risk Management , 1989, ESEC.

[15]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Samar Mouakket,et al.  Varieties of Political Process During Systems Development , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  Communication and Organization in Software Development: An Empirical Study , 1997, IBM Syst. J..

[18]  D. L. Gladstein Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[19]  Daniel W. Robert Creating an Environment for Project Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[20]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[21]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  Cybernetics and Dependence: Reframing the Control Concept , 1988 .

[22]  Carol Saunders,et al.  Responding to a rapidly changing workplace , 1999 .

[23]  S. J. Simon,et al.  The Current Status of the IS Discipline: A Survey of American and International Business Schools , 1999 .

[24]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .