A comparison of the Index of Complexity Outcome and Need (ICON) with the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] S. Richmond,et al. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). , 2000, Journal of orthodontics.
[2] S. Richmond,et al. The professional perception of orthodontic treatment complexity , 1997, British Dental Journal.
[3] V. Holt,et al. Factors influencing patient loyalty to dentist and dental practice , 1997, British Dental Journal.
[4] S. Richmond,et al. Factors affecting the outcome of orthodontic treatment within the general dental service. , 1997, British journal of orthodontics.
[5] Christopher Hinman. The Dental Practice Board Orthodontics—The Current Status , 1995, British Journal of Orthodontics.
[6] S. Richmond,et al. The relationship between the index of orthodontic treatment need and consensus opinion of a panel of 74 dentists , 1995, British Dental Journal.
[7] J H McColl,et al. Use of the PAR Index in Assessing the Effectiveness of Removable Orthodontic Appliances , 1993, British journal of orthodontics.
[8] N A Fox,et al. The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (peer assessment rating) index , 1993, British Dental Journal.
[9] C D Stephens,et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.
[10] S. Richmond,et al. Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standards , 1991, British Dental Journal.