The use of assistive devices and change in use during the ageing process among very old Swedish people

Purpose: To investigate the characteristics and change in use among very old Swedish users and non-users of assistive devices (ADs) for mobility and personal care, over a six-year period, and to investigate factors predicting AD use over a six-year period. Method: Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data from a subsample from the Swedish part of the ENABLE-AGE Survey Study, n = 154. Variables according to socio-demographics, environment and health were utilized. Results: The number of users increased over time, particularly those using both types of ADs (mobility and personal care). There were differences in health between users and non-users, while no such differences were seen regarding socio-demographics or environmental factors. Health factors most prominent predicted AD use after six years, but also variables within socio-demographics and the environment had an impact on the use; income for ADs for personal care and aspects in the outdoor environment for ADs for mobility. Conclusions: As ADs increases over time, it is important, to pay attention to health as well as other factors, among users and non-users of ADs, to provide important information in planning for and supporting healthy and active ageing. Implications for Rehabilitation The combination of device use for mobility and personal care increases over time for very old people. Very old people’s perceived physical mobility can indicate future needs for mobility devices. It is important to consider outdoor environmental barriers impact on mobility device use.

[1]  Otr,et al.  A New Conceptual Model for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2010 .

[2]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Factors associated with home environmental problems among community-living older people. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: conceptual and methodological background of the European ENABLE-AGE Project. , 2007, The Gerontologist.

[4]  H. Kaye,et al.  Disparities in Usage of Assistive Technology Among People With Disabilities , 2008, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[5]  James A Lenker,et al.  A Review of Conceptual Models for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[6]  Gunilla Carlsson,et al.  Very old people's experience of occupational performance outside the home: Possibilities and limitations , 2007, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[7]  U. Sonn,et al.  Use of assistive devices in daily activities among 85-year-olds living at home focusing especially on the visually impaired , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  Synneve Dahlin Ivanoff,et al.  Changes in the use of assistive devices among 90-year-old persons , 2005, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[9]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Use of mobility devices and changes over 12 months among very old people in five European countries , 2007, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[10]  Rachael Gooberman-Hill,et al.  Making decisions about simple interventions: older people's use of walking aids. , 2007, Age and ageing.

[11]  V. Menec.  The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[12]  A. Vanbiervliet,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  M J Scherer,et al.  A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[14]  J. Kronenfeld,et al.  Maintaining functional independence in elderly adults: the roles of health status and financial resources in predicting home modifications and use of mobility equipment. , 2002, The Gerontologist.

[15]  C. Bengtsson,et al.  Symptoms by age and sex. The population studies of men and women in Gothenburg, Sweden. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[16]  Nick Freemantle,et al.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: guideline for the primary care management of dementia , 1998, BMJ.

[17]  James A Lenker,et al.  A New Conceptual Model for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2004, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[18]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  U. Sonn,et al.  Use of assistive devices – a reality full of contradictions in elderly persons' everyday life , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[20]  R. Rubin,et al.  Race, disability and assistive devices: sociodemographics or discrimination , 2001 .

[21]  U. Sonn,et al.  Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  N. I. Edwards,et al.  Ownership and use of assistive devices amongst older people in the community. , 1998, Age and ageing.

[23]  Ewa Wressle,et al.  User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: An important element in the rehabilitation process , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[24]  H Nazirah,et al.  THE APPLICATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH (ICF) BY WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(WHO) IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE PRACTICE , 2007 .

[25]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[26]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Very old Swedish women's experiences of mobility devices in everyday occupation: A longitudinal case study , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[27]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Assessment of dependence in daily activities combined with a self-rating of difficulty. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[28]  L H Kraskowsky,et al.  Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[29]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Experiences among older persons using mobility devices , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[30]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  The Housing Enabler. An Instrument for Assessing and Analysing Accessibility Problems in Housing. , 2001 .

[31]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Fear of Moving Outdoors and Development of Outdoor Walking Difficulty in Older People , 2009, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[32]  J. Ware.  SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .

[33]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[34]  Margo van Hartingsveldt,et al.  Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-being, & Justice through Occupation , 2008 .

[35]  William C. Mann,et al.  Predictors of the Use of Assistive Devices that Address Physical Impairments Among Community-Based Frail Elders , 2004 .

[36]  Machiko Tomita,et al.  Dissatisfaction and Nonuse of Assistive Devices Among Frail Elders , 2002, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[37]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[38]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Assistive devices among very old people in five European countries , 2005, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.