Acoustic, Myoelectric, and Aerodynamic Parameters of Euphonic and Dysphonic Voices: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Background: At present, there is no clinical consensus on the concept of normal and dysphonic voices. For many years, the establishment of a consensus on the terminology related to normal and pathological voices has been studied, in order to facilitate the communication between professionals in the field of the voice. Aim: systematically review the literature to compare and learn more precisely the measurable and objective characteristics of the acoustic, aerodynamic and surface electromyographic parameters of the normal and dysphonic voices. Methods: The PRISMA 2020 methodology was used as a review protocol together with the PICO procedure to answer the research question through six databases. Results: In total, 467 articles were found. After duplicate records were removed from the selection, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and 19 articles were eligible. A qualitative synthesis of the included studies is presented in terms of their methodology and results. Conclusions: Studying the acoustic, aerodynamic, and electromyographic parameters with more precision, in both normal and dysphonic voices, will allow health professionals working in the field of voice (speech therapy, otorhinolaryngology, phoniatrics, etc.) to establish a diagnostic and detailed consensus of the vocal pathology, enhancing the communication and generalization of results worldwide.

[1]  H. J. Silva,et al.  Electrical activity of extrinsic laryngeal muscles in subjects with and without dysphonia. , 2015, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[2]  Shaheen N Awan,et al.  Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores. , 2016, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[3]  Soren Y Lowell,et al.  Aerodynamic and Acoustic Features of Vocal Effort , 2019 .

[4]  Assessment of dysphonia due to benign vocal fold lesions by acoustic and aerodynamic indices: a multivariate analysis , 2011, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[5]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. , 2007, Gaceta sanitaria.

[6]  M. Murad,et al.  Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports , 2018, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

[7]  Rita R. Patel,et al.  Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function. , 2018, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[8]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Daryush D. Mehta,et al.  Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls. , 2019, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[10]  M. Vuković,et al.  Acoustic voice analysis of patients with vocal fold polyp. , 2011, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[11]  C. Shewell The effect of perceptual training on ability to use the Vocal Profile Analysis Scheme. , 1998, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[12]  M. El-Banna,et al.  The relationship between subjective self-rating and objective voice assessment measures , 2010, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[13]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[15]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Relationship Between Subglottal Pressure and Sound Pressure Level in Untrained Voices. , 2016, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[16]  HyangHee Kim,et al.  Aging Effect on Korean Female Voice: Acoustic and Perceptual Examinations of Breathiness , 2016, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[17]  Estella P-M Ma,et al.  Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[18]  J. Perkell,et al.  Aerodynamic and acoustic voice measurements of patients with vocal nodules: variation in baseline and changes across voice therapy. , 2003, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[19]  Wei-Yang Su,et al.  Laryngeal aerodynamic analysis in assisting with the diagnosis of muscle tension dysphonia. , 2012, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[20]  M. Behlau The 2016 G. Paul Moore Lecture: Lessons in Voice Rehabilitation: Journal of Voice and Clinical Practice. , 2019, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[21]  Felix Schaeffler,et al.  Assessing voice health using smartphones: bias and random error of acoustic voice parameters captured by different smartphone types. , 2019, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[22]  C. Jiménez,et al.  ESTUDIO OBJETIVO DE LA VOZ EN POBLACIÓN NORMAL Y EN LA DISFONÍA POR NÓDULOS Y PÓLIPOS VOCALES , 2001 .

[23]  Andrzej Skalski,et al.  Voice data mining for laryngeal pathology assessment , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[24]  E. Yiu,et al.  Reliability and applicability of aerodynamic measures in dysphonia assessment , 2004, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[25]  Edie R. Hapner,et al.  Aerodynamic Patterns in Patients With Voice Disorders: A Retrospective Study. , 2017, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[26]  A. Hachiya,et al.  Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders. , 2016, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[27]  D. Mehta,et al.  Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders. , 2017, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[28]  J. Stemple,et al.  Quick screen for voice and supplementary documents for identifying pediatric voice disorders. , 2004, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[29]  B. Murdoch,et al.  The effects of age and gender on laryngeal aerodynamics. , 1998, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[30]  Giovanni Saggio,et al.  Worldwide Healthy Adult Voice Baseline Parameters: A Comprehensive Review. , 2020, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[31]  Leonardo Wanderley Lopes,et al.  Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses. , 2017, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[32]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[33]  Farshad Almasganj,et al.  Pathological assessment of patients' speech signals using nonlinear dynamical analysis , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.