The influence of government affiliations on firm product innovation in a dynamic institutional environment: insights from China

PurposeBuilding on resource dependence theory and the dynamic institution-based view, this paper examines the influence of government affiliations on firm product innovation in a dynamic institutional environment.Design/methodology/approachUsing unique panel data of Chinese manufacturing firms covering a period of 12 years (1998–2009) with 2,564,547 firm-year observations, this study chooses the panel Tobit model with random effects to explore the influence of government affiliations on firm product innovation, followed by an analysis to test the moderation effects of dynamic institutional environments.FindingsThe study findings suggest that Chinese firms with higher-level government affiliations have a relatively high product innovation performance. It finds that this innovation stimulating effect is contingent on the dynamic nature of the institutional environment. To be specific, a high speed of institutional transition may depress the positive innovation effects of government affiliations, while a more synchronized transition speed of institutional components may enhance the positive innovation effects of firms' government affiliations.Originality/valueThis study adds to a better understanding of the drivers of product innovation in Chinese firms that are situated in environments that are characterized by institutional change, using and contributing to resource dependence theory and the dynamic institution-based view.

[1]  S. Murtinu,et al.  Tobit models in strategy research: Critical issues and applications , 2019, Global Strategy Journal.

[2]  Xiande Zhao,et al.  Effects of business and political ties on product innovation performance: Evidence from China and India , 2019, Technovation.

[3]  Chun Yang,et al.  The Value of Business–Government Ties for Manufacturing Firms’ Product Innovation during Institutional Transition in China , 2018, Sustainability.

[4]  Zhenyu Wu,et al.  Government affiliation, real earnings management, and firm performance: The case of privately held firms , 2018 .

[5]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics , 2017 .

[6]  Sali Li,et al.  Acquisition or greenfield entry into Africa? Responding to institutional dynamics in an emerging continent , 2017 .

[7]  Chun Yang,et al.  High-tech start-up firm survival originating from a combined use of internal resources , 2017 .

[8]  Chengqi Wang,et al.  The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China , 2017 .

[9]  Crystal X. Jiang,et al.  Examining the Complementary Effect of Political Networking Capability With Absorptive Capacity on the Innovative Performance of Emerging-Market Firms , 2017 .

[10]  A. Page,et al.  Managerial ties and product innovation: The moderating roles of macro- and micro-institutional environments , 2017 .

[11]  P. Boeing,et al.  The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Firm Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms , 2017 .

[12]  W. Shi,et al.  Institutional fragility and outward foreign direct investment from China , 2017 .

[13]  D. Augustine,et al.  Political Ties and Firm Performance: The Effects of Proself and Prosocial Engagement and Institutional Development , 2016 .

[14]  M. Kafouros,et al.  Institutional development and firm profitability in transition economies , 2016 .

[15]  Philipp G. Sandner,et al.  China's R&D explosion - analyzing productivity effects across ownership types and over time , 2016 .

[16]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Buffering and Enabling: The Impact of Interlocking Political Ties on Firm Survival and Sales Growth , 2015 .

[17]  Haibin Yang,et al.  Market-based reforms, synchronization and product innovation , 2015 .

[18]  K. Eddleston,et al.  When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view , 2015 .

[19]  A. Villadsen,et al.  Political Ties of Listed Chinese Companies, Performance Effects, and Moderating Institutional Factors , 2015, Management and Organization Review.

[20]  U. Efobi,et al.  Innovation in Africa: Why Institutions Matter , 2014 .

[21]  Elitsa R. Banalieva.  Embracing the Second Best? Synchronization of Reform Speeds, Excess High Discretion Slack, and Performance of Transition Economy Firms , 2014 .

[22]  L. Markoczy,et al.  The Continuing Importance of Political Ties in China , 2014 .

[23]  S. Negassi,et al.  The nature of market competition and innovation: does competition improve innovation output? , 2014 .

[24]  P. Heugens,et al.  Synthesizing and Extending Resource Dependence Theory , 2012 .

[25]  M. Wright,et al.  Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies , 2012 .

[26]  D. Xu,et al.  Linking Theory and Context: ‘Strategy Research in Emerging Economies’ after Wright et al. (2005) , 2012 .

[27]  Murali D. R. Chari,et al.  Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: an empirical test in the Indian context , 2012 .

[28]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Does market-oriented institutional change in an emerging economy make business-group-affiliated multinationals perform better? An institution-based view , 2010 .

[29]  A. Hillman,et al.  Resource Dependence Theory: A Review , 2009 .

[30]  Shige Makino,et al.  Which country matters? Institutional development and foreign affiliate performance , 2008 .

[31]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies , 2008 .

[32]  Ethan Michelson.  Lawyers, Political Embeddedness, and Institutional Continuity in China’s Transition from Socialism1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Haiyang Li,et al.  The role of managers' political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China's transition economy , 2007 .

[34]  Shaomin Li,et al.  When Iron Fist, Visible Hand, and Invisible Hand Meet: Firm-Level Effects of Varying Institutional Environments in China , 2007 .

[35]  David R. King,et al.  Effects of Firm R&D Investment and Environment on Acquisition Likelihood , 2006 .

[36]  Mingxing Liu,et al.  Perspective on Local Governance Reform in China , 2006 .

[37]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON HOW GOVERMENTS MATTER , 2005 .

[38]  Mara Faccio,et al.  Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts , 2005 .

[39]  Mike W. Peng.  Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices , 2003 .

[40]  Kai-Alexander Schlevogt,et al.  Institutional and Organizational Factors Affecting Effectiveness: Geoeconomic Comparison Between Shanghai and Beijing , 2001 .

[41]  John Child,et al.  China's Transition and its Implications for International Business , 2001 .

[42]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[43]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link , 2000 .

[44]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change , 2000 .

[45]  M. Hitt,et al.  Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions , 1999 .

[46]  Peter C. Murrell,et al.  The Relationship between Economic Growth and the Speed of Liberalization During Transition , 1997 .

[47]  Mary Tripsas.  UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[48]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[49]  Thomas G. Rawski.  Implications of China' Reform Experience , 1995, The China Quarterly.

[50]  John A. Hansen,et al.  Innovation, firm size, and firm age , 1992, Small Business Economics.

[51]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model , 1990 .

[52]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[53]  Jun Xia,et al.  On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms , 2018 .

[54]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Are joint venture partners more opportunistic in a more volatile environment , 2007 .

[55]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .