Environmental health and genomics: visions and implications

The relationship between genes and the environment can be compared to a loaded gun and its trigger. A loaded gun by itself causes no harm; it is only when the trigger is pulled that the potential for harm is released. Genetic susceptibility creates an analogous situation, where the loaded gun is one or a combination of susceptibility genes (alleles) and the trigger is an environmental exposure. The key objective of the Environmental Genome Project is to identify alleles that confer susceptibility to the adverse effects of environmental agents. Here we discuss the goals of the Environmental Genome Project, its implications and, in particular, its potential effect on our ability to assess human disease risk in the future.

[1]  Jack A. Taylor,et al.  The role of N-acetylation polymorphisms in smoking-associated bladder cancer: evidence of a gene-gene-exposure three-way interaction. , 1998, Cancer research.

[2]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[3]  T. Heidmann,et al.  Cosuppression of I transposon activity in Drosophila by I-containing sense and antisense transgenes. , 1999, Genetics.

[4]  A. Vinogradov.  Intron–Genome Size Relationship on a Large Evolutionary Scale , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[5]  Ronald H. A. Plasterk,et al.  A genetic link between co-suppression and RNA interference in C. elegans , 2000, Nature.

[6]  M. Nei,et al.  Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  J. Barrett,et al.  The environmental genome project: ethical, legal, and social implications. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  Phillip SanMiguel,et al.  Evidence that a Recent Increase in Maize Genome Size was Caused by the Massive Amplification of Intergene Retrotransposons , 1998 .

[9]  A. Vinogradov.  Buffering: a possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  J. Kaiser.  Environment Institute Lays Plans for Gene Hunt , 1997, Science.

[11]  R. Britten,et al.  General interspersion of repetitive with non-repetitive sequence elements in the DNA of Xenopus. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  D. Finnegan,et al.  Copy number control of a transposable element, the I factor, a LINE-like element in Drosophila. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  N. Holtzman,et al.  Will genetics revolutionize medicine? , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Birchler,et al.  Less from more: cosuppression of transposable elements , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[15]  D. Hartl,et al.  Autoregulation of mariner transposase activity by overproduction and dominant-negative complementation. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  G. Gloor,et al.  A role for the KP leucine zipper in regulating P element transposition in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1995, Genetics.

[17]  Minoru Kanehisa,et al.  The size differences among mammalian introns are due to the accumulation of small deletions , 1996, FEBS letters.

[18]  A. J. Schafer,et al.  Microbial natural products: Alive and well in 1998 , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  S Henikoff,et al.  Something from nothing: the evolution and utility of satellite repeats. , 1998, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[20]  N. Craig,et al.  Mobile DNA elements: controlling transposition with ATP-dependent molecular switches. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  F. Crick,et al.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite , 1980, Nature.

[22]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[23]  C. Nusbaum,et al.  Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. , 1998, Science.

[24]  G Bernardi,et al.  Isochores and the evolutionary genomics of vertebrates. , 2000, Gene.

[25]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Tn10 transpososome assembly involves a folded intermediate that must be unfolded for target capture and strand transfer , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Brian Charlesworth,et al.  The changing sizes of genes , 1996, Nature.

[27]  F. Guengerich.  The Environmental Genome Project: functional analysis of polymorphisms. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  M. Beaton,et al.  Eukaryotic non-coding DNA is functional: evidence from the differential scaling of cryptomonad genomes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  M. Long,et al.  Intron-exon structures of eukaryotic model organisms. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution , 1980, Nature.

[31]  D. Petrov,et al.  Genome size and intron size in Drosophila. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[32]  S L Shalat,et al.  The Environmental Genome Project. , 1998, Epidemiology.

[33]  Phillip SanMiguel,et al.  The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[34]  D. Petrov,et al.  Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome. , 2000, The Journal of heredity.

[35]  P. Brown,et al.  Genomics and human disease—variations on variation , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[36]  D. Petrov,et al.  High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.