Partitioning strategies for the interaction of a fluid with a poroelastic material based on a Nitsche’s coupling approach

Abstract We develop a computational model to study the interaction of a fluid with a poroelastic material. The coupling of Stokes and Biot equations represents a prototype problem for these phenomena, which feature multiple facets. On one hand, it shares common traits with fluid–structure interaction. On the other hand it resembles the Stokes–Darcy coupling. For these reasons, the numerical simulation of the Stokes–Biot coupled system is a challenging task. The need of large memory storage and the difficulty to characterize appropriate solvers and related preconditioners for the equations at hand are typical shortcomings of classical discretization methods applied to this problem, such as the finite element method for spatial discretization and finite differences for time stepping. The application of loosely coupled time advancing schemes mitigates these issues, because it allows to solve each equation of the system independently with respect to the others, at each time step. In this work, we develop and thoroughly analyze a loosely coupled scheme for Stokes–Biot equations. The scheme is based on Nitsche’s method for enforcing interface conditions. Once the interface operators corresponding to the interface conditions have been defined, time lagging allows us to build up a loosely coupled scheme with good stability properties. The stability of the scheme is guaranteed provided that appropriate stabilization operators are introduced into the variational formulation of each subproblem. The error of the resulting method is also analyzed, showing that splitting the equations pollutes the optimal approximation properties of the underlying discretization schemes. In order to restore good approximation properties, while maintaining the computational efficiency of the loosely coupled approach, we consider the application of the loosely coupled scheme as a preconditioner for the monolithic approach. Both theoretical insight and numerical results confirm that this is a promising way to develop efficient solvers for the problem at hand.

[1]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems , 2005 .

[2]  Annalisa Quaini,et al.  Algorithms for fluid-structure interaction problems arising in hemodynamics , 2009 .

[3]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Modeling Fractures in a Poro-Elastic Medium , 2014 .

[4]  Martina Bukac,et al.  Analysis of partitioned methods for the Biot System , 2015 .

[5]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  A lubrication fracture model in a poro-elastic medium , 2015 .

[6]  Ronaldo I. Borja,et al.  Block-preconditioned Newton–Krylov solvers for fully coupled flow and geomechanics , 2011 .

[7]  M. Gunzburger,et al.  Coupled Stokes-Darcy model with Beavers-Joseph interface boundary condition , 2010 .

[8]  Béatrice Rivière,et al.  Locally Conservative Coupling of Stokes and Darcy Flows , 2005 .

[9]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Numerical Approximation of Partial Differential Equations , 2008 .

[10]  Andro Mikelić,et al.  Convergence of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geomechanics , 2013, Computational Geosciences.

[11]  Carlo D'Angelo,et al.  Numerical approximation with Nitsche's coupling of transient Stokes'/Darcy's flow problems applied to hemodynamics , 2012 .

[12]  Hoang Tran,et al.  Analysis of Long Time Stability and Errors of Two Partitioned Methods for Uncoupling Evolutionary Groundwater-Surface Water Flows , 2013, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[13]  Annalisa Quaini,et al.  Coupling Biot and Navier-Stokes equations for modelling fluid-poroelastic media interaction , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  S. Eisenstat,et al.  Variational Iterative Methods for Nonsymmetric Systems of Linear Equations , 1983 .

[15]  Paolo Zunino,et al.  A Finite Element Method Based on Weighted Interior Penalties for Heterogeneous Incompressible Flows , 2009, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[16]  Xiaoliang Wan,et al.  Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. , 2010 .

[17]  Patrick Le Tallec,et al.  Linear stability analysis in fluid–structure interaction with transpiration. Part I: Formulation and mathematical analysis , 2003 .

[18]  Jeffrey M. Connors,et al.  A fluid‐fluid interaction method using decoupled subproblems and differing time steps , 2012 .

[19]  Y. Maday Analysis of coupled models for fluid-structure interaction of internal flows , 2009 .

[20]  Béatrice Rivière,et al.  Time-dependent coupling of Navier–Stokes and Darcy flows , 2013 .

[21]  William J. Layton,et al.  Decoupled Time Stepping Methods for Fluid-Fluid Interaction , 2012, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[22]  Vincent Martin,et al.  Modeling Fractures and Barriers as Interfaces for Flow in Porous Media , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[23]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  A multiscale Darcy–Brinkman model for fluid flow in fractured porous media , 2011, Numerische Mathematik.

[24]  E. Miglio,et al.  Mathematical and numerical models for coupling surface and groundwater flows , 2002 .

[25]  Weidong Zhao,et al.  Finite Element Approximations for Stokes–darcy Flow with Beavers–joseph Interface Conditions * , 2022 .

[26]  F. Brezzi,et al.  On the Stabilization of Finite Element Approximations of the Stokes Equations , 1984 .

[27]  Erik Burman,et al.  Stabilization of explicit coupling in fluid-structure interaction involving fluid incompressibility , 2009 .

[28]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Theory and application of a finite element method for arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian fluids and structures , 1982 .

[29]  J. Guermond,et al.  Theory and practice of finite elements , 2004 .

[30]  J. Halleux,et al.  An arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions , 1982 .

[31]  Erik Burman,et al.  Explicit strategies for incompressible fluid‐structure interaction problems: Nitsche type mortaring versus Robin–Robin coupling , 2014 .

[32]  Ary,et al.  On the interface law between a deformable porous medium containing a viscous fluid and an elastic body∗ , 2011 .

[33]  Ivan Yotov,et al.  Coupling Fluid Flow with Porous Media Flow , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[34]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Modeling fluid injection in fractures with a reservoir simulator coupled to a boundary element method , 2014, Computational Geosciences.

[35]  E. Ramm,et al.  Artificial added mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows , 2007 .

[36]  Frédéric Hecht,et al.  New development in freefem++ , 2012, J. Num. Math..

[37]  R. Showalter Poro-plastic filtration coupled to Stokes flow , 2005 .

[38]  Sören Bartels,et al.  Numerical Approximation of Partial Differential Equations , 2016 .

[39]  Annalisa Quaini,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in blood flow capturing non-zero longitudinal structure displacement , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[40]  Ruben Juanes,et al.  Stability and convergence of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics: Drained and undrained splits , 2011 .

[41]  Ivan Yotov,et al.  Effects of poroelasticity on fluid-structure interaction in arteries: A computational sensitivity study , 2015 .

[42]  Peter Hansbo,et al.  Nitsche's method for interface problems in computa‐tional mechanics , 2005 .

[43]  G. C. Lee.,et al.  Numerical simulation for the propagation of nonlinear pulsatile waves in arteries. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[44]  Ivan Yotov,et al.  An operator splitting approach for the interaction between a fluid and a multilayered poroelastic structure , 2015 .

[45]  Ivan Yotov,et al.  Explicit partitioning strategies for the interaction between a fluid and a multilayered poroelastic structure: an operator-splitting approach , 2013 .