Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method

AbstractThe aim of this paper is to solve an agricultural technology packages selection problem by considering multiple dimensions which influence a maize producer’s preferences. The decision-making process is aided by a new multicriteria method for eliciting scale constants in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff (FITradeoff). This method works with partial information, obtained from the decision maker (DM), and thus reduces the time that the DM has to spend on the process for eliciting his/her preferences as he/she may avoid answering difficult questions. The decision-making process makes use of a decision support system (DSS), in which the DM interactively gives preference statements in a structured manner. The DSS gives flexibility to the DM, in such way that he/she gives as much information as he/she is willing to. Graphical visualization is provided at each step in order to help the DM’s analyses. Throughout the description of an application, some insights are provided including a discussion of the advantages and features of the FITradeoff method.

[1]  Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa,et al.  A flexible elicitation procedure for additive model scale constants , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)-elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  Sarah Ben Amor,et al.  The value of additional information in multicriteria decision making choice problems with information imperfections , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  Jacques-Eric Bergez,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a hierarchical qualitative model for sustainability assessment of cropping systems , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Martin Weber Decision Making with Incomplete Information , 1987 .

[7]  Jesus René Villalobos,et al.  Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  J. Eric Bickel,et al.  A Generalized Sampling Approach for Multilinear Utility Functions Given Partial Preference Information , 2014, Decis. Anal..

[9]  Juan Carlos Leyva López,et al.  A Multicriteria Group Decision Model for Ranking Technology Packages in Agriculture , 2018 .

[10]  Martin Weber,et al.  Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making , 1993 .

[11]  Juan Carlos Leyva López,et al.  A Group Decision Outranking Approach for the Agricultural Technology Packages Selection Problem , 2017, GDN.

[12]  Justo Puerto,et al.  Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision processes , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decision Support by Interval SMART/SWING - Incorporating Imprecision in the SMART and SWING Methods , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[14]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[15]  Thierry Doré,et al.  Using a multicriteria assessment model to evaluate the sustainability of conservation agriculture at the cropping system level in France , 2016 .

[16]  Vito Fragnelli,et al.  The Shapley value in the Knaster gain game , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application , 1985, Oper. Res..

[18]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  Farmers' Stepwise Adoption of Technological Packages: Evidence from the Mexican Altiplano , 1986 .

[19]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[20]  Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa,et al.  A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Raymond Reau,et al.  Assessing innovative cropping systems with DEXiPM, a qualitative multi-criteria assessment tool derived from DEXi , 2012 .

[22]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Advances in decision analysis , 1999 .

[23]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements , 1992, Oper. Res..

[24]  Violaine Deytieux,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of cropping systems in single- and multi-site studies. A review of methods , 2016 .